I take it Mr Landau would be just as relaxed about me borrowing his car
without permission for a quick spin in the country, as long as I refilled
his petrol so he lost nothing? I am intrigued that someone on this list
(which is all about respecting one particular set of laws) should casually
recommend breaking another set of laws. Partiocularly in view of the fact
that apparently Private Eye is generous in granting permissions, why not do
them the courtesy of requesting such permission?
Charles
Professor Charles Oppenheim
Department of Information Science
Loughborough University
Loughborough
Leics LE11 3TU
Tel 01509-223065
Fax 01509-223053
e mail [log in to unmask]
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nick Landau" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 10:37 AM
Subject: Re: Private Eye Data Protection cartoon
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "C.Oppenheim" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 9:54 AM
> Subject: Re: [data-protection] Private Eye Data Protection cartoon
>
>
>> "Reporting current events" refers to, for example, reproducing the text
>> of a recent speech by, or a video of, Tony Blair speaking, or copying the
>> video of a great goal from the World Cup. At the time of the controversy
>> over the Danish cartoons depicting Mohamed, one might have reproduced
>> them and claimed this was fair dealing for reporting current events. In
>> other words, it's the common sense use of the phrase "current events".
>> Reproducing a cartoon about data protection is hardly "current events",
>> especially as the content of the cartoon is generic and does not refer to
>> some specific recent news story.
>>
>> You could do argue the case for criticism or review if the Private Eye
>> cartoon was being posted so that we could do a critical appraisal of the
>> cartoon's style and content, but that wasn't the idea, was it? It was to
>> entertain us! Review and criticism means just what is says on the tin.
>>
>> In a nutshell, the terms used in the bit of the copyright act regarding
>> fair dealing need to be construed in common sense ways.....
>>
>
> Any fair-minded person would I think that this is related to the scale of
> the thing. Using for a small professional journal as a bit of
> "entertainment" (and why not?) or training is hardly something to trouble
> a publisher.
>
> I understand that Charles' background includes working for large
> publishers.
>
> I don't really think what is being proposed will overturn the copyright
> laws.
>
> I think that we are making a mountain out of a molehill.
>
> Nick Landau
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
> available to the world wide web community at large at
> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html
> If you wish to leave this list please send the command
> leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
> All user commands can be found at : -
> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/commandref.htm
> Any queries about sending or receiving message please send to the list
> owner
> [log in to unmask]
> (all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
available to the world wide web community at large at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html
If you wish to leave this list please send the command
leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
All user commands can be found at : -
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/commandref.htm
Any queries about sending or receiving message please send to the list owner
[log in to unmask]
(all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|