Just to echo Bryan here, I think it would be useful if colleagues were
able to think about how they might use 'medical evidence' and what they
need it for.
The medical model focussed DSA application requires medical evidence but
if we are truly committed to the social model we should have little or
no need for medical evidence.
The medical and social models of disability have not yet left us, indeed
I believe there are still many people around who still consider this
'news', I also see evidence of a distinct lack of knowledge of the
social model so I think there is still work to be done in that area.
Doctors may be unwilling to state more than 'X tells me that' because
they do not know X and there is no substantive evidence that they can
point to. At exam time many counsellors will recognise the approach from
the stressed student asking that they 'just write to my faculty and tell
them I couldn't do the exam' when the counsellor has never met them
before, this is when the letter starts 'X tells me that they...' it
seems possible that doctors are being put in difficult positions at
times too!
One recent incident has surprised me and is testament to this, an LEA
who have as evidence local authority registration as partially sighted
and a letter from the doctor citing 'ocular albinism' now want the
doctor the say how it affects the student (who is studying an art
subject with a heavy requirement on vision) before they will sanction an
assessment of needs! well...it lead to them being placed on the
Partially Sighted register and getting DLA so I'd say it affected them
somewhat!
Feeling end of termish here
Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: Discussion list for disabled students and their support staff.
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Bryan Jones
Sent: 13 December 2005 09:10
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Medical Evidence
Well yes the medical evidence is about the DSA and required in order to
trigger that, it is a DfES requirement. For an instituion it is not
always about the condition being long standing and first identifed at
school, etc. As to the Medical / Social models going out with the ark,
who says? We are not medics and sometimes DOs and Assessors can get far
too hung up on medical issues as messages to these forums can sometimes
testify. Disability Officers and Assessors have to look at the
practical and social issues affecting the student, not trying to look
flash by talking about the dosage and what type of medication a student
is taking, as can be read in some assessment reports.
Bryan Jones,
Manager, Disability Support Services
& North London Regional Access Centre,
Middlesex University
Tel: 020 8411 5366
-----Original Message-----
From: Discussion list for disabled students and their support staff.
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ian F.
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 3:11 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Medical Evidence
Bryan - the assessment referred to in these guidelines is not the DSA
Study
Aids/Strategies Assessment. It's a medical/diagnostic assessment of the
disability for the purposes of establishing eligibility for DSA. Also,
medical and social models of disability went out with the ark... didn't
they
:-)
I think it makes sense for an institution to adopt the same policy on
medical evidence as used by LAs. LAs require evidence that clearly
states a
disability exists. As Bryan says, a GP letter that says the student
'claims
to have ...' or 'tells me he has ...' is not evidence of a disability.
The
GP letter must clearly state that the student is diagnosed with the
condition . For example, if the GP says the student has eyesight
problems
he/she must say what condition is causing these problems. If the LA or
DO
has any concerns about the potential effect of this condition on
studying
he/she should seek further advice e.g. by contacting RNIB.
However, some flexibility is recommended in implementing these rules.
For
example, a GP letter might describe several symptoms of a problem
without
making a final diagnosis. The letter might say the student is being
referred
for further specialist tests. This could mean the student is probably
going
to be diagnosed with a condition but it can't be formally diagnosed at
this
stage. The LA, DO or SASSA assessor needs to be able to 'read between
the
lines' when processing this type of evidence.
Ian Francis
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bryan Jones" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 2:38 PM
Subject: Re: Medical Evidence
> The assessment referred to in these guidelines is about the full DSA
> study aids and strategies assessment that Assessment Centres undertake
> and charge for. But within an institution it is the Disability
> Officers job to evaluate / assess the situation taking account of
> available medical evidence along with a face to face discussion with
> the student and an understanding of what is expected of the student on
> their course and the institutions regulations. A doctor is not best
> placed to determine how much if at all the a medical condition will
> impact on a student's studies, because they are too remote from what
> is expected of the student, what the institutions is able to provide
> under their regs, or (with the DDA in mind) what would be "reasonable"
> in the given circumstances. Also. we should be working to the Social
> Model not Medical Model, i.e don't get too hung up on medical issues,
> we have to address the practical issues. That said, adequate medical
> evidence is required and a Disability Officer could ask for better,
> more detailed, evidence if what was available was too vague, as many
> conditions can be on a spectrum ranging from very mild to severe and
> debilitating and can also affect people in different ways, so a bit
> more detail than just a medical term is preferable, required even.
> Also a doctors note saying "John reports that he has back pain" or
> "Jane tells me that she had flu last week" are not adequate for most
> institutions.
>
> Bryan Jones,
> Manager, Disability Support Services
> & North London Regional Access Centre,
> Middlesex University
> Tel: 020 8411 5366
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Discussion list for disabled students and their support staff.
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ian Webb
> Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 10:30 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Medical Evidence
>
>
> I am not sure that a policy document is what is required at this
> stage. The LEA has been given clear guidance as to what is a
> disability for the purpose of the
> DSA. I suggest that you look at the guidance which is available on the
> DfES web
> site. Chapter 69 states:
>
> 69. For most applicants, there should be little difficulty
> establishing their eligibility for DSAs. Their disability will have
> been identified and documented at an
> earlier stage, in many cases while they were at school. However, it
is
> not
> essential for an applicant's disability to have been identified at
> school in order to
> be eligible for DSAs. Nor is eligibility dependant on an applicant
being
> registered
> as disabled. Care will be needed for applicants whose disabilities
have
> not
> previously been identified. In such cases, LAs should request an
> assessment of
> the disability by a suitably qualified person or body for the purposes
> of
> establishing eligibility for DSAs.
>
> I hope this helps
>
> Ian
>
>
> Quoting Rebecca Lewis <[log in to unmask]>:
>
>> Does anyone have a medical evidence policy for students with
>> disabilities (but not dyslexia). We do not currently have one and I
>> am interested
> in
>> whether other universities have rules about what type of evidence
>> they
>
>> will or won't accept. This came up most recently for us when a
>> studnet
>
>> with an eye condition was asked for medical evidence - she provided a
> GPs
>> letter which said just that she had this condition - no other
> information
>> was given - of course the GP probably knows very little about it
> because
>> he would not be involved in any treatment for the condition. We
> normally
>> accept a GP letter but this has made me wonder whether we should
> consider
>> having a formal policy.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Rebecca
>>
>
>
> --
> Ian Webb
> Disability Adviser/assessor
> MNADO
----------------------------------------
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users. It has
removed 18735 spam emails to date. Paying users do not have this message
in their emails. Try www.SPAMfighter.com for free now!
This email is intended solely for the addressee. It may contain private and confidential information. If you are not the intended addressee, please take no action based on it nor show a copy to anyone. In this case, please reply to this email to highlight the error. Opinions and information in this email that do not relate to the official business of Nottingham Trent University shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by the University.
Nottingham Trent University has taken steps to ensure that this email and any attachments are virus-free, but we do advise that the recipient should check that the email and its attachments are actually virus free. This is in keeping with good computing practice.
|