In response to Scott's email I would just query:
Whether the lecturer is truly writing the notes the night before or just
wanting to avoid the responsibility for earlier preparation and circulation
of notes, however brief
If so, I would guess the lecturer in question would also want to avoid
'advance time needed for conversation'.
Finally, Scott writes that his 'lecture style that has been successful for
the last 20 plus years' - while not doubting this or Scott's
professionalism, I would just ask - successful for whom? Student profiles
have changed enormously in 20 years and as practitioners we need to be
learners too and develop our practices to create the most successful
learning experiences for all our students.
--On 15 November 2005 12:14 -0500 "Lissner, Scott" <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
> I am writing from the US and am only passingly familiar the DDA, SENDA
> and the Code of Practice but it is a familiar issue and I have some
> practical thoughts that might be helpful and some conceptual musings.
>
> If the lecturer is truly writing notes the night before then my guess is
> that he or she is not typically giving copies to students to read but
> may be putting some notes on the board during the lecture and that is
> what the student will be missing. If this is the case than the only
> advance time needed is for conversion and if the Lecturer can e-mail a
> digital copy that could be printed out in Braille or read with adaptive
> technology this student would be as prepared as everyone else.
>
> There are lecturers, myself included, that do not lecture from
> meaningful notes. I will have jotted an occasional name few key figures
> or dates and sometimes a topic or two but I rarely have notes. Would it
> be reasonable to ask me to change a lecture style that has been
> successful for the last 20 plus years? If I put some facts and figures
> on the board I would need to verbalize them and arranging a scribe/note
> taker for the student might make sense but not providing notes where
> none exist.
>
> The conundrum is trying to determine if what the lecturer is presenting
> about their creation and use of lecture notes is true or a pretext for
> discrimination.
>
>
>
> L. Scott Lissner, ADA Coordinator
> Office Of The Provost, The Ohio State University
> 292-6207(v); 688-8605(tty); 688-3665(fax)
> HTTP://ADA.OSU.EDU
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Discussion list for disabled students and their support staff.
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jackson, Elizabeth
> Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 11:56 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Lecture notes in advance
>
> Hi Kate
>
> If the student is blind or partially sighted (B or PS) and only given
> the notes on the day of the lesson they will not have the same rights of
> access as their sighted peers and, therefore, not be included in the
> lesson - it's the same as giving a B or PS learner the handouts in
> lesson, asking them to read it and then discuss with the rest of the
> group. This is, ultimately, excluding the B or PS learner from
> participating, which is then seen as discrimination!
>
> Is the first time the lecturer has ever delivered the course, then I can
> understand that they may have anything prepared, although this is a
> little unusual. If the lecturer has delivered the course before, then
> there is no excuse for not having handouts or resources prepared!
>
> Regards
>
> Liz Jackson
> Acting Regional Manager
> Royal National Institute of the Blind
> London & South East Regional Services
> 0207 391 2138 / 07789812230
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Discussion list for disabled students and their support staff.
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Katy Mann
> Sent: 15 November 2005 16:27
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Lecture notes in advance
>
> We have a lecturer who is claiming they cannot provide lecture notes in
> advance for students with disabilities as they only prepare the lecture
> the night before and therefore should not be expected to do so. My
> feeling is that, with consideration to the current legislation, and in
> terms of encouraging good practice, that this contravenes the notion of
> a 'reasonable adjustment'
>
> I could find no specific examples that relate directly to this within
> the Code of Practice but would appreciate any advice/ feedback from
> anyone else who has encountered this problem. How did you deal with it?
>
> Many Thanks
>
> Katy
> Katy Mann
> Disability Adviser
> West End sites
> Room CG80, Chiltern Building
> University of Westminster
> 35 Marylebone Road
> London NW1 5LS
>
> --
> DISCLAIMER:
>
> NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is
> confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended
> recipient you should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of the
> content of it or of any attachment; you are requested to notify the
> sender immediately of your receipt of the email and then to delete it
> and any attachments from your system.
>
> RNIB endeavours to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by
> its staff are free from viruses or other contaminants. However, it
> cannot accept any responsibility for any such which are transmitted.
> We therefore recommend you scan all attachments.
>
> Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and
> any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
> those of RNIB.
>
> RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227
>
> Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk
----------------------
KC Thomas,
Organising Tutor: Personal Support Worker Training 2005
Project Co-ordinator: Employment Scene 2005-6
Centre for Access and Communication Studies, University of Bristol
[log in to unmask]
0117 954 5718
|