My understanding was that assessors would recommend the cost of a standard
dial-up connection and it was up to the student to meet the difference in
cost if they wanted to up-grade to broadband. I may be wrong as I really
don't understand the ISP provision, but that's what I thought.
Fozya Sharif
Disability/Dyslexia Adviser
UEL
-----Original Message-----
From: Discussion list for disabled students and their support staff.
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Dudley, Jane
Sent: 08 November 2005 19:47
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Internet Provision
Hi
Thank you for the responses received so far. I just thought I would clarify
that I do not recommend internet for every student I assess - only those who
I feel are unable to use university facilities in a similar way to other
students. It was simpler to say "I tend to recommend etc" but looking back
may have looked like I "always" recommend internet provision.
My initial question came about because of a student who I assessed last year
when he was on placement - he didn't get his equipment last year so now that
he is back at university and he wants me to write to his LEA to say that his
internet provision should be £25 per month for a 2 MB broadband feed - this
seems rather excessive and so I did some research on internet provision as I
hadn't done any for internet provision for at least a year and though that
maybe I wasn't being reasonable with recommending £16 per month and I should
be recommending more.
I have seen a couple of other reports recently from other assessors and the
internet provision on these was up to £15 so thought I was recommending
slightly more than the norm.
Regards
Jane
________________________________
From: Discussion list for disabled students and their support staff. on
behalf of Ian Webb
Sent: Tue 08/11/2005 17:09
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Internet Provision
The DSA can pay for an allowance towards the cost of using the Internet for
students who have an additional need created by their disability. Originally
in the days of pay as you go it was often a case of trying to work out how
much time should be spent as a student on the internet and then calculating
the additional cost caused by the students needs. Of course it quickly became
the norm to make a fairly standard recommendation for all students who needed
the internet of say 80GBP.
Now in the days of broadband there is no additional cost as a flat rate gives
24/7 coverage. It could be argued and often is that therefore there is no
need of an allowance to cover the internet charges as there is no longer an
additional cost. Assessors have to be careful that they are making a
recommendation for costs which are created by an additional need and not just
following custom and practise.
Ian
Quoting "Dudley, Jane" <[log in to unmask]>:
> Could I ask what other assessors recommend in AON's for internet
provision?
> I have tended to recommend up to £16 per month and this is usually
ample if
> the student has access to NTL or the student has a BT line installed.
>
> What if the student doesn't have a BT line installed and needs to have
one
> installed do assessors add the line rental to the cost of the internet
> provision - will LEA's pay for the line rental as well as internet
> provision?
>
> Regards
> Jane
>
> This email is intended solely for the addressee. It may contain
> private
and
> confidential information. If you are not the intended addressee,
> please
take
> no action based on it nor show a copy to anyone. In this case, please
reply
> to this email to highlight the error. Opinions and information in
> this
email
> that do not relate to the official business of Nottingham Trent
> University shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by the
> University. Nottingham Trent University has taken steps to ensure that
> this email
and any
> attachments are virus-free, but we do advise that the recipient should
check
> that the email and its attachments are actually virus free. This is
> in keeping with good computing practice.
>
--
Ian Webb
Disability Adviser/assessor
MNADO
This email is intended solely for the addressee. It may contain private and
confidential information. If you are not the intended addressee, please take
no action based on it nor show a copy to anyone. In this case, please reply
to this email to highlight the error. Opinions and information in this email
that do not relate to the official business of Nottingham Trent University
shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by the University.
Nottingham Trent University has taken steps to ensure that this email and any
attachments are virus-free, but we do advise that the recipient should check
that the email and its attachments are actually virus free. This is in
keeping with good computing practice.
|