JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DATA-PROTECTION Archives


DATA-PROTECTION Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Archives


data-protection@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Home

DATA-PROTECTION Home

DATA-PROTECTION  2005

DATA-PROTECTION 2005

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: References

From:

Edwina Withe <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Edwina Withe <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 11 Nov 2005 11:41:44 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (171 lines)

I think you have to deal with it on a case by case basis.  I  don't see
the point of routinely holding references back - it only makes things
worse.  Generally employees only go down this route when they are
aggrieved about something so hiding things unnecessarily only stokes the
fire!  If you give a reference for someone you need to be able to stand
by it.  I say don't write it if you would be embarrassed later!  As a
public authority Durant is not much use to me as they would probably get
the unstructured data anyway if they used the FOI legislation.   I think
it is easier to be open and honest rather than devious and obstructive. 
Just because the legislation allows u to withhold info and gives you a
let out in certain cases there is no obligation on you to actually do
so!

>>> <[log in to unmask]> 11/11/2005 11:11:07 >>>
In a message dated 10/11/05 09:52:13 GMT Standard Time, 
[log in to unmask] writes:

> What is the groups view on references when requested as part of a
staff 
> personal file?
-------

If the references are held in a manual file it is very likely they
would 
*not* have to be revealed if you really wanted to keep them from the
employee.  
Bear with me. (Don't worry, it's just a stuffed one!)

Unless personnel files are held in a highly-structured manner, they
will be 
exempt from subject access after the Durant case.  We must remember
that the 
CoA went beyond explaining that the file in that case was not even
personal 
data, and described what they thought was meant by "structure" in a
manual file.

My interpretation is that if the documents in one person's file are in
a 
different order to those in another person's file, there is likely to
be no 
structure.  So, say for example there are no indeces on the file and
finding the 
references is a matter of picking up the file and leafing through it,
the file is 
likely to be exempt from subject access.  If, on the other hand, the 
references are always at the back of a personnel file - the references
could be part 
of a structured system.

Now we all know that this in essence means that the majority of manual
files 
(except for housing, social work & education records) will be exempt
from 
subject access.  Many people feel that the Durant case is wrong and
might be 
redundant once the European beaurocrats get their heads round it, but
for the 
moment it is the law of the land and (along with Johnson) could/should
be observed.

There is one caveat, however, and that is that agreements between
public 
sector employers and the unions may dictate that a personnel file is
made 
available on request (within 7 days, I believe) and that redactions are
agreed with 
the TU.  I am not saying in the particular case that the person is in
the union 
or that the national agreement has not been overridden by a local
arrangement 
but I am suggesting you look at that area before making a decision on
the 
matter.

My own view?  If you have nothing to hide, show them the references. 
If you 
do have something to hide or you would rather protect the source,
refuse.  It 
is unlikely the person would take you to court to try to force
disclosure.  
Possession is everything.

My company policy?  All references are open - outgoing and incoming -
and 
referees are told this when we write to them.  It concentrates the
mind, ensures 
they don't say anything they cannot substantiate and if they do make a
genuine 
mistake the prospective candidate can challenge the reference and we
can have 
it sorted long before we even think about setting them on.

What would I do if I was the employee?  I would insist on disclosure of
all 
documents related to me, including references, I would quote the old
advice 
from the ICO, I would even contact the referees thamselves to ask if
they kept a 
copy of what they sent.  I would complain to the ICO if I did not get
the 
references, then I would look at my bank balance and see if I could
afford to take 
you to court without the help of the ICO.  Of course I wouldn't have
that 
sort of cash available and you'd get away with it.


Ian B


Ian Buckland
Keep I.T. Legal Ltd
(Reg: 3822335)

Please Note: The information given above does not replace or negate the
need 
for proper legal advice and/or representation. It is essential that you
do not 
rely upon any advice given without contacting your solicitor.  If you
need 
further explanation of any points raised please contact Keep I.T. Legal
Ltd at 
the address below:

55 Curbar Curve
Inkersall, Chesterfield
Derbyshire  S43 3HP 

Tel: 01246 473999 
Fax: 01246 470742
E-mail: [log in to unmask] 

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
       All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
      available to the world wide web community at large at
      http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html 
      If you wish to leave this list please send the command
       leave data-protection to [log in to unmask] 
            All user commands can be found at : -
        http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/commandref.htm 
Any queries about sending or receiving message please send to the list
owner
              [log in to unmask] 
  (all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please)
   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


**********************************************************************************
                                                                                                                This e-mail may be read by employees of the Council and is therefore not to be considered private by the recipient. The views expressed in this e-mail are those of the individual and not necessarily the views or opinions of Bracknell Forest Borough Council. 

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the system manager.  Email: [log in to unmask] 

This footnote also confirms that this e-mail has been swept by MailSweeper for the presence of computer viruses. Although the Council has taken steps to ensure that this e-mail and any attachments are virus free we advise that in keeping with good ICT practice the recipients should confirm this for themselves.

**********************************************************************


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
       All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
      available to the world wide web community at large at
      http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html
      If you wish to leave this list please send the command
       leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
            All user commands can be found at : -
        http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/commandref.htm
Any queries about sending or receiving message please send to the list owner
              [log in to unmask]
  (all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please)
   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager