JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DIS-FORUM Archives


DIS-FORUM Archives

DIS-FORUM Archives


DIS-FORUM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DIS-FORUM Home

DIS-FORUM Home

DIS-FORUM  2004

DIS-FORUM 2004

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Standard font type and size

From:

Bernard Doherty <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Discussion list for disabled students and their support staff.

Date:

Tue, 20 Jul 2004 12:47:50 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (184 lines)

You might try Verdana, which has the advantage of spacing which makes it
easier to read when the characters are themselves very small.  (This is one
of the reasons why it is becomming increasingly popular with web designers,
I think.)  I remember a while back (several years ago) John Stein had some
research out about what made characters easy to read and the conclusion was
that physical size by itself was a long way down the list of priorities.  If
anyone has a reference to this research, I would be glad of it.



Bernard Doherty
Assessor
East Anglia Regional ACCESS Centre
Anglia Polytechnic University
East Road
Cambridge CB1 1PT

01223 363271 x2534
[log in to unmask]
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Gregory" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 12:15 PM
Subject: Re: Standard font type and size


> 14 point is generally regarded as being too large for standard
> documentation.  12 point would be the absolute minimum with the option of
> producing larger copies on request.
>
> With regard to fonts, many of the san serif fonts should be readable by
> someone with a vision impairment as it is the serifs which cause the
> problem.  However, as there are probably as many different eye conditions
as
> there are fonts, it is always tricky to determine which would be the most
> widely accepted.  Again, if someone has problems with the font you choose,
> then consult with the individual and produce it in the most appropriate
> format to suit that individual.  As you say, Arial is the RNIB;s preferred
> font, but others such as Univers, Gill Sans and Helvetica are equally as
> good.
>
> Obviously this poses problems if one is talking about very large
documents.
> However, someone somewhere has produced that document on a PC and it can
be
> easily reformatted or provided as an electronic format.
>
> JG.
>
> John Gregory
> Access Officer
>
>                 -----Original Message-----
>                 From:   Haeussler Elvira
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>                 Sent:   20 July 2004 11:57
>                 To:     [log in to unmask]
>                 Subject:        Standard font type and size
>
>                 Hello all,
>
>                 I have recently run across a problem when asked to give
> advice on an
>                 accessible font for the College to use in all its
materials
> . The aim was to
>                 find a font type and size that would be acceptable to as
> many people as
>                 possible, including people with various disabilities. I
> suggested using
>                 Arial, as that is the font suggested as a standard by the
> RNIB. However, I
>                 have since been contacted by someone working with people
> with poor literacy,
>                 who told me that some of the punctuation in Arial was
> difficult to read for
>                 people with literacy needs, and that their suggested font
> was Century
>                 Gothic, which in turn is difficult for people with poor
> sight to read.
>
>                 I am getting the impression that different groups suggest
a
> different font
>                 style and size to use as a standard. Does anyone know of a
> font that would
>                 be suitable for as many different people as possible?
>
>                 Also, I know that the RNIB suggest using 14 point print as
a
> standard.
>                 however, I have had many complaints from colleagues
because
> it looks too big
>                 on a page and takes up too much room. Does anyone know
what
> size is best
>                 used as a standard?
>
>                 I'd be interested in your comments.
>
>                 Regards
>
>                 Elvira Haeussler
>                 WONDER 2 Project Manager
>                 Dewsbury College
>                 Halifax Road
>                 Dewsbury
>                 WF13 2AS
>                 Tel: 01924 465 916
>                 E-mail: [log in to unmask]
>
>
>
>
>
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>                 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>                 The information transmitted in this email is intended only
> for the person or
>                 entity to which it is addressed and may contain
confidential
> and/or
>                 privileged material. If you are not the intended
recipient,
> please delete
>                 this e-mail immediately. The contents of this e-mail must
> not be disclosed
>                 or copied without the sender's consent. Unencrypted
> electronic mail is not
>                 secure, may not be authentic and may be susceptible to
data
> corruption,
>                 interception, unauthorised amendment or viruses or the
> consequences thereof.
>                 This email and any attachments are opened at your own
risk.
> If you have any
>                 doubts as to the contents please contact the
> sender.Statements and opinions
>                 expressed in this e-mail may not necessarily represent
those
> of Dewsbury
>                 College.
>
>
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>                 +++++++++++++
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
>                 This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star
> Internet. The
>                 service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on
a
> proactive
>                 anti-virus service working around the clock, around the
> globe, visit:
>                 http://www.star.net.uk
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> This e-mail is confidential and may contain legally privileged
information.  You should not disclose its contents to any other person.  If
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately.
>
> Whilst the Council has taken every reasonable precaution to minimise the
risk of computer software viruses, it cannot accept liability for any damage
which you may sustain as a result of such viruses.  You should carry out
your own virus checks before opening the e-mail (and/or any attachments).
>
> Unless expressly stated otherwise, the contents of this e-mail represent
only the views of the sender and do not impose any legal obligation upon the
Council or commit the Council to any course of action.
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
> service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
> anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
> http://www.star.net.uk
> ________________________________________________________________________
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager