In a message dated 26/05/04 23:26:51 GMT Daylight Time, [log in to unmask]
writes:
<< If you feel that Needs Assessments, Equipment, training and
dyslexia/study support should come under scrutiny, which areas will QAG
*not* be looking into? If it does look into dyslexia/study support,
what sort of issues might it focus on? >>
OK, well I was originally passing on a request from one of the training
organisations that training came under a similar arrangements as the Suppliers SLA.
Several people suggested just today the organisations providing study support
MIGHT also be considered appropriate services.
I don't see why not but I don't at present have any specific views on what
they might look at. It might be qualifications, it might be demonstrating the
they have no connection with the assessment service that recommended them or if
they have, establishing that they were not the only service suggested.
Having said that, I exprect to get shot dowen for meddling All I would say is
it wasn't my idea and I don't have a view on what should happen. As the topic
was raised I thought it worth mentioning that QAG MIGHT look at training and
support.
In answer to your question, no I don't think there is anything within the DSA
process that QAG can be expected to ignore. This is not saying I want to be
involved in those things myself though.
Mick Trott
|