In a message dated 21/05/04 10:26:18 GMT Daylight Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:
> Searchable electronically for individual record level data in a systematic
> and indexed manner, or searchable electronically for file level access? TO
> me the distinction is highly relevant.
>
> A tape backup, for example, differs from a disk to disk copy in its
> characteristics. Incremental backup schemes are restorable, but not usually
> searchable at record level
----------
Although this may be the next step towards reducing the rights of access, the
most recent case only drew a distinction between records that were held
electronically and those that were not. Maybe the next judge will advance the
erosion by agreeing with you that non-searchable-at-record-level electronic
records should also be exempt - at least until they are restored to a searchable
system.
Ian B
Ian Buckland
Managing Director
Keep IT Legal Ltd
Please Note: The information given above does not replace or negate the need
for proper legal advice and/or representation. It is essential that you do not
rely upon any advice given without contacting your solicitor. If you need
further explanation of any points raised please contact Keep I.T. Legal Ltd at
the address below:
55 Curbar Curve
Inkersall, Chesterfield
Derbyshire S43 3HP
(Reg 3822335)
Tel: 01246 473999
Fax: 01246 470742
E-mail: [log in to unmask]
Website: www.keepitlegal.co.uk
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
available to the world wide web community at large at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html
If you wish to leave this list please send the command
leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
All user commands can be found at : -
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/commandref.htm
(all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|