>Just because the Durant ruling is obstructive it doesnt impose any
obligation on >you to be obstructive with regard to providing info. Surely
it would be better to be >open and responsive when dealing with SARs
instead of withholding information just >because you can?
Absolutely - and good practice for public sector bodies which will have to
take this stance in a few months anyway. One of the problems, though, is
that the ruling provides a route for an organisation to be obstructive if
it wishes to be.
Regards,
Graham
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
available to the world wide web community at large at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html
If you wish to leave this list please send the command
leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
All user commands can be found at : -
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/commandref.htm
(all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|