On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 11:24:33 +0100, Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
>In that case it would seem probable that civil debtors are to be pursued
via
>their national insurance payment point.
I believe that is the long-term plan - following 'Access to Justice' review
report by Lord Woolf last year. Loads of recommendations including transfer
of responsibilities from litigants to the courts to reduce cost / delay /
inequality in civil cases.
Present attachment to earnings provisions for things like fines (criminal &
contempt), child maintenance, etc. to be extended to include civil damages
so courts would also need NINO for that purpose.
Seems one of the less contentious extensions to use of NINO to me, regards,
Kirsty.
Kirsty E Gray
Access to Information Advisor
Commission for Social Care Inspection
Note: comments for discussion and debate only and do not necessarily
reflect the corporate position of CSCI nor constitute legal advice.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
available to the world wide web community at large at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html
If you wish to leave this list please send the command
leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
All user commands can be found at : -
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/commandref.htm
(all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|