In message <000001c4aad9$c9ec7ac0$553468d5@ntlworld>, at 13:49:37 on
Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]> writes
>Roland Perry on 05 October 2004 at 09:18 said:-
>> Are you saying that all they should do is give up at the 40
>> days and say
>> "so sue me", rather than struggle on and get the data sorted out in 45
>> days (which is what happened in my case)?
>
>Not at all.
>
>I am saying that it is lawfully possible, given the ICO's stated advice for
>third party data, to close the file at the forty day period and not follow
>up on any outstanding third party requests.
Sorry, I'm not asking about situations with third parties, just the
simpler ones.
>Equally so with any additional self imposed 40 day clock.
>
>The easy decision appears to be to contact a third party rather than
>disclose. What lengths is it necessary to then go to in chasing third party
>data?
>
>Would you as an informed third party respond to a request by a data
>controller to disclose material identifying you?
It would depend on the circumstances.
--
Roland Perry
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
available to the world wide web community at large at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html
If you wish to leave this list please send the command
leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
All user commands can be found at : -
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/commandref.htm
(all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|