The contents of this e-mail are confidential and may be privileged. Please refer to the notice at the foot of this e-mail before reading any further.
Attached is the Press Release from the Home Affairs Select Committee - note that it is embargoed till midnight
Basically its "we support the ID Card .... but the Committee is concerned about the lack of clarity over the scheme's scope and practical operation: the report warns that key elements in the proposal are poorly thought out and that the draft Bill goes far wider than is necessary to introduce a simple system to establish and demonstrate identity.
It is unclear how the card and the register will work in practice. The Government should clarify the number, type and costs of card readers and supporting infrastructure required by the scheme. It should also be clear about the number and level of checks on card use that it anticipates."
So apart from poorly thought out proposals and a Bill that goes too wide, an ID Card scheme could be useful.
C
-----Original Message-----
From: Home Affairs Committee [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 29 July 2004 13:02
To: Home Affairs Committee
Subject: Embargoed: HOME AFFAIRS COMMITTEE BACKS ID CARDS BUT CRITICIZES IMPLEMENTATION AND PROPOSED DRAFT LEGISLATION
<<...OLE_Obj...>>
Home Affairs Committee
News Release
Committee Office, House of Commons, London, SW1A 0AA
Media Enquiries: Adele Brown 020 7219 0724 / 07711 155 722
EMBARGOED: NOT FOR PUBLICATION OR BROADCAST UNTIL
00.01 on Friday 30 July 2004
Attn: News Desks
Political, Home Affairs Correspondents
COMMITTEE BACKS ID CARDS BUT CRITICISES IMPLEMENTATION AND PROPOSED DRAFT LEGISLATION
A wide-ranging report published today by the Home Affairs Select Committee gives broad backing for Government plans to introduce identity cards but warns of a number of key problems that must be tackled to ensure the scheme's success.
The Committee concludes that the ID card scheme should go ahead and says it can make a real and important contribution to the fight against organised crime and terrorism by disrupting the use of multiple identities, identity fraud and related crimes like money laundering. An ID card scheme, accompanied by wider enforcement measures, could play a significant role in helping to reduce illegal working and immigration.
The report notes it would be easier to establish entitlement to public services and to prevent abuse and says the scheme has the potential to help with joined up government.
Civil liberties' objections to the scheme were carefully considered. Whilst recognizing that it would change the relationship between citizen and state, the report concludes that identity cards should not be ruled out on grounds of principle alone: the test should be whether the costs are proportionate to the benefits. International experience indicates that compulsory and voluntary ID cards and population registers operate successfully in other countries. The Committee concludes that the Government has made a convincing case for proceeding with the introduction of identity cards.
However, the Committee is concerned about the lack of clarity over the scheme's scope and practical operation: the report warns that key elements in the proposal are poorly thought out and that the draft Bill goes far wider than is necessary to introduce a simple system to establish and demonstrate identity.
It is unclear how the card and the register will work in practice. The Government should clarify the number, type and costs of card readers and supporting infrastructure required by the scheme. It should also be clear about the number and level of checks on card use that it anticipates.
Stressing that the detailed design of the ID card and the national identity register is critical to its successful operation, the Committee calls for the current proposals to be open to wider scrutiny by technical experts and the public. Concerns were also raised about commercial confidentiality and the current IT procurement process with MPs concluding that more openness is needed.
The report expresses concerns about the proliferation of Government databases and says that an opportunity for joined up Government is being missed. It notes the significant overlap between the General Register Office's proposal for a UK population register-the Citizen Information Project-the proposed identity cards database and other databases. MPs believe that there should not be a central database holding all individual information, but the identity card should enable access to all Government databases.
The Committee makes a number of recommendations to strengthen the draft Identity Card Bill, including a clear statutory aim for the ID card scheme, a powerful and independent regulator, and new primary legislation before a compulsory scheme is introduced.
Commenting on the report Committee Chairman Rt Hon John Denham MP said:
"The Government's ID card scheme can help in the fight against terrorism, serious crime, illegal immigration and abuse of public services. It could also help the development of joined up government. The potential benefits justify its introduction.
"The Government has only one chance to get it right: whether public support continues will depend on how the scheme works in practice, and its impact on everyday life.
"This ID card scheme should go ahead but the Government must take serious note of the criticism we make of the way the plan is being developed.
"A successful scheme depends on whether the cards and the national register are used and checked effectively. We need more clarity on how the card and the register will work in practice. We don't know how many card readers and biometric readers will be needed or paid for, or how may times each card will be checked and whether that check will be visual, card reader or biometric.
"The Home Office has allowed commercial sensitivities to stand in the way of proper technical and public scrutiny of the practical details of the scheme. Too many major IT projects have failed in the past and the Government must adopt an open procurement process. At the same time, the proliferation of Government databases must be tackled.
"There is a golden opportunity for joined-up Government here, and a real risk that the opportunity will be missed. An ID card scheme could play a useful role in improving the co-ordination of access to public services. But the Government has not yet put forward clear proposals to do so.
"The draft Bill must be strengthened, and clear statutory limits placed on the use of the national identity register.. The Bill creates, for example, a statutory national fingerprint register. This is a major step to take without any legal aim or purpose."
<ENDS>
NOTES TO EDITORS:
The report is the result of a 9 month inquiry into all features of identity cards including the practical aspects of the Government's proposals and its draft Bill. The Committee looked at: the practical issues involved in the ID database and biometric identifiers; the security and integrity of the proposed system; the operational use of ID cards in establishing identity, accessing public services, and tackling illegal migration, crime, and terrorism; issues to be addressed in the longer-term, including compulsion; and the estimated cost of the system.
Further information about the inquiry along with evidence transcripts are available on the Committee's website: www.parliament.uk/parliamentary_committees/home_affairs_committee.cfm
The report's title is Identity Cards and will be published as the Committee's Fourth Report, Session 2003-04 (HC 130). The report will be available on the Committee's website from 1530 on
Friday 30 July.
Committee Membership is as follows: Chairman: Rt Hon John Denham MP, Janet Anderson MP, Mr David Cameron MP, Mr James Clappison MP, Mrs Claire Curtis-Thomas MP, Mrs Janet Dean MP, Mr Gwyn Prosser MP, Bob Russell MP, Mr Marsha Singh MP, Mr John Taylor MP, David Winnick MP
Media Enquiries / bids: Adèle Brown, 020 7219 0724
Press Notice No. 34, Session 2003-04
FURTHER INFORMATION:
Media Enquiries: Adele Brown, Tel 020 7219 0724 / 07711 155 722, email: [log in to unmask]
Specific Committee Information: Tel 020 7219 3276, email: [log in to unmask]
Committee Website: http://www.parliament.uk/parliamentary_committees/home_affairs_committee.cfm
Watch committees and parliamentary debates online: www.parliamentlive.tv
***************************************************************************
UK Parliament Disclaimer:
This e-mail is confidential to the intended recipient. If you have received
it in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system.
Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or copying is not permitted.
This e-mail has been checked for viruses, but no liability is accepted
for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail.
***************************************************************************
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet using
MessageLabs SkyScan services. For more information visit: www.star.net.uk.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
We are delighted to announce that Masons and Out-Law.com have once again been shortlisted for recognition in this year's e-LOTIES and LOTIES Awards (Legal Office Technology Innovation Awards).The annual awards are organised by In Brief Magazine. We would be grateful if you would take five minutes to vote for us!
Voting closes on 30th July for the e-LOTIES and on 22nd October for the LOTIES. Please visit
www.masons.com/php/page.php?page_id=eloties4400 for further details
If you have received this e-mail in error, do not use the contents of the e-mail or disclose it to any other person. Please notify us by reply, or telephone our London office on +44 (0) 20 7490 4000, and then delete the e-mail. We believe, but do not warrant, that this e-mail and its attachments are virus-free, but you should check. Masons may monitor traffic data of both business and personal e-mails. By replying to this e-mail, you consent to Masons' monitoring the content of any e-mails you send to or receive from Masons. Masons is not liable for any opinions expressed by the sender where this is a non-business e-mail.
Masons is an international law firm with offices in London, Bristol, Edinburgh, Glasgow, Leeds, Manchester, Brussels, Hong Kong and Shanghai. Further information about the firm and a list of partners are available for inspection at 30 Aylesbury Street, London EC1R 0ER or from our web site at www.masons.com. Each of our offices is regulated by the relevant local law society.
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet using MessageLabs SkyScan services. For more information visit: www.star.net.uk.
_________________________________________________________________________________________
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
available to the world wide web community at large at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html
If you wish to leave this list please send the command
leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
All user commands can be found at : -
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/commandref.htm
(all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
