JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DATA-PROTECTION Archives


DATA-PROTECTION Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Archives


data-protection@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Home

DATA-PROTECTION Home

DATA-PROTECTION  2004

DATA-PROTECTION 2004

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Viewing CCTV footage

From:

Ian Mansbach <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Ian Mansbach <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 10 Jun 2004 11:50:11 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (188 lines)

Julie

If you no longer have the original tape (or any copy of it) and you cannot
determine the purposes and manner of processing any personal data contained
on the original or any copy then you are not a data controller. You might
want to check with the police or your legal department as to what if any
control you still have over the tape which is now in the possession of the
police, just to satisfy youself that you aren't in facty able to determine
the purposes and manner of processing.

If you are no longer a data controller then you can have no subject access
obligations and you don't have to consider the issue of viewing facilities
for the copy versus a possible SAR. In that case, in my opinion, there is no
particular reason why you should afford viewing facilities to the 2 people
concerned. Unless, of course, you just want to be helpful.

Ian


-----Original Message-----
From: Julie Davenport [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
Sent: 10 June 2004 11:11
To: [log in to unmask]; [log in to unmask]; [log in to unmask]
Subject: RE: [data-protection] Viewing CCTV footage


Thank you for your comments.  Although we were the original Data Controller
we obtained the footage relating to the incident in question.  The local
Police then seized the tape to conduct an investigation.  We are no longer
holding the data, therefore not processing.  Is that correct?    The Police
would then record that we were the Source of the data.  The Police then
provided a copy of the tape to the individuals.  Isn't it their
responsibility to ensure that it is in a format which is compatible with
their recording equipment?  Because we hold viewing equipment should we
invite the individuals in the view the material.  My initial thoughts were
to refer them back to the Police to view as they provided the information.

With kind regards,

Julie Davenport
Data Protection Adviser
01902 554498


-----Original Message-----
From: Ian Mansbach [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
Sent: 10 June 2004 10:27
To: [log in to unmask]; [log in to unmask]
Cc: Julie Davenport
Subject: RE: [data-protection] Viewing CCTV footage


Ian B

In the context of Julie's original question which related to the 2 people
viewing (presumably) "their" copy of the tape on her Council's equipment
(presumably the same as or compatible with that used by her Council in
recording the original tape in the first place), the viewing is not caught
by the DPA so far as the Council is concerned. In my later comments, I
refined the issue of DPA applicability in relation to the 2 people who
control the copy.

Of course, the original tape recorded by the Council (and presumably still
in their possession) is caught by the Act. The recording, storage and
disclosure of the original tape by the Council are all DPA issues for the
Council as will be any likely subject access request received if facilities
to view the copy are not provided. To the extent that information on the
copy of the tape constitutes personal data, the 2 possessors of the copy
tape are data controllers as they are the persons who "determine the
purposes for which and the manner in which any personal data are or are to
be processed" [s1(1)]. How they acquired the copy tape or the fact that in
its present state the data are not viewable without recourse to the
Council's equipment makes no difference. The Council determines the purposes
and manner of processing the personal data contained on the original tape,
and the other 2 folks determine the purposes and manner of processing of the
personal data on "their" copy. The Council is data controller in respect of
the original tape and the other 2 folks are data controllers in respect of
"their" copy.

My suggestion would be to allow the 2 people to view "their" copy on the
Council's equipment since there are no DPA issues for the Council in doing
so. If the Council doesn't provide viewing facilities, they are more than
likely to receive a SAR  which will almost certainly cost the Council more
to deal with. But that's just my practical perspective!

Ian Mansbach
Mansbachs
Data Protection Practitioners
[log in to unmask]
phone: 0871 716 5060
international: +44 (871) 716 5060


-----Original Message-----
From: This list is for those interested in Data Protection issues
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of [log in to unmask]
Sent: 10 June 2004 09:24
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [data-protection] Viewing CCTV footage


In a message dated 09/06/04 14:23:22 GMT Daylight Time, [log in to unmask]
writes:


> If the 2 people are viewing "their" tape (ie the copy in their
> possession) on equipment belonging to you then it isn't caught by the
> DPA.

---------
Has the DPA world gone mad?  The tape was recorded by the council
(presumably on cameras with pan, tilt and zoom), disclosed to the police
under an exemption (presumably), copies then given to the individuals
without the permission (or knowledge) of the data controller, are
incompatible with VHS, therefore it is held in a manner in which it can be
processed by the original data controller - and it's not caught by DPA?  How
can this be so?

I would tell the individuals to go back to their source and request a VHS
copy of the tape, inform the police that if they have the legal right to
give copies to the data subjects they should ensure the format is correct
and finally inform the individuals that for security reasons you cannot
allow them into the control room.

But then, as most people know, I am an awkward so-and-so.

Ian B


Ian Buckland
Managing Director
Keep IT Legal Ltd

Please Note: The information given above does not replace or negate the need
for proper legal advice and/or representation. It is essential that you do
not rely upon any advice given without contacting your solicitor.  If you
need further explanation of any points raised please contact Keep I.T. Legal
Ltd at the address below:

55 Curbar Curve
Inkersall, Chesterfield
Derbyshire  S43 3HP
(Reg 3822335)
Tel: 01246 473999
Fax: 01246 470742
E-mail: [log in to unmask]
Website: www.keepitlegal.co.uk

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
       All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
      available to the world wide web community at large at
      http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html
      If you wish to leave this list please send the command
       leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
            All user commands can be found at : -
        http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/commandref.htm
  (all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
DISCLAIMER: This email and files transmitted are confidential and are
intended solely for the use of the intended recipient.  If you are not the
intended recipient, or the person responsible for delivering it to the
intended recipient, you may not copy, disclose, distribute or use it in any
unauthorised manner.  If you have received this email in error please notify
us by email to [log in to unmask] and then delete it and any
attachments accompanying it.  Please note that Wolverhampton City Council
cannot guarantee that this message or any attachments are virus free or have
not been intercepted and amended. Any views or opinions expressed within
this email are those of the author and may not necessarily reflect those of
Wolverhampton City Council and no contractual arrangement is intended to
arise from this communication.
============================================================================
==

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
       All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
      available to the world wide web community at large at
      http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html
      If you wish to leave this list please send the command
       leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
            All user commands can be found at : -
        http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/commandref.htm
  (all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager