But if it's analogous to standing up in a public meeting and saying 'I'm
so-and-so and I live on this street and I don't want that person living
here' it might be understandable if afterwards someone thinks better of it
but too late for it not to be a public act. No-one from the authority
compelled or encouraged them to sign, did they?
There might be arguments against disclosure, but I find it hard to see how
you can be so categorical, Annette.
Paul
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carter, Antoinette (CCM) [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 2:55 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Petition
>
> I couldn't disagree more. What possible legitimate purpose could this
> information be put to? Public document or not, the petitioners will not
> have been expecting the information to be made available to the partner.
> Was there a "fair collection notice" on the petition to this effect? I
> doubt it.
>
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
available to the world wide web community at large at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html
If you wish to leave this list please send the command
leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
All user commands can be found at : -
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/commandref.htm
(all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|