Which seems a reasonable point of view to take. Given that resources
are scarce (as they should be) would you not rather that the OIC pursued
the things which mattered the most?
Regards
Jim
=================================================
-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Bowden [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 21 July 2004 13:54
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Privacy Policy changes
. . .
The OIC's argument basically boils down to "if you can't show how you're
actually harmed by them not giving or explaining the information, then
we don't have time to pursue the matter".
**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
www.mimesweeper.com
**********************************************************************
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
available to the world wide web community at large at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html
If you wish to leave this list please send the command
leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
All user commands can be found at : -
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/commandref.htm
(all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|