JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DATA-PROTECTION Archives


DATA-PROTECTION Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Archives


data-protection@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Home

DATA-PROTECTION Home

DATA-PROTECTION  2004

DATA-PROTECTION 2004

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Public domain if disclosed in court?

From:

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Paul Ticher <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 13 May 2004 13:01:15 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (275 lines)

S.35 would cover the disclosure by the court.  Would it also cover further
recording and/or disclosure of the information unconnected to the court
proceedings?


Paul Ticher
0116 273 8191
22 Stoughton Drive North, Leicester LE5 5UB

I hereby require any recipient of this message not to use my personal data
for direct marketing purposes.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Maurice Frankel" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 12:46 PM
Subject: Re: Public domain if disclosed in court?


> What is the basis of the normal practice of disclosing, at committal,
> the defendant's name and the charges which have been laid? I haven't
> checked, but I wouldn't  be surprised to discover it  was required
> under court rules.  If so, this information would exempt from the
> non-disclosure provisions under s 35(1) of the DPA.
>
>
> Maurice Frankel
> Campaign for Freedom of Information
>
>
> On 12 May 2004, at 17:22, Paul Ticher wrote:
>
> > The Data Protection Act does not explicitly recognise the public
> > domain.  (A
> > view also recognised by the Commissioner's staff in conversation.)
> > The fact
> > that something is in the public domain may, however, have implications
> > for
> > Data Protection: for example, the level of security required might,
> > arguably, be lower in a particular case, since the consequences of
> > unauthorised access would perhaps be less serious.
> >
> > Court proceedings are, of course, sensitive data.  Which Schedule 3
> > Condition is being met here?  Note that Condition 5 only refers to
> > sensitive
> > information which has been *deliberately* made public by the Data
> > Subject.
> > There may sometimes be a case to be made that a disclosure such as
> > this,
> > without consent, meets one or other of the Conditions, but I don't see
> > one
> > labelled 'Administrative convenience'.
> >
> > Paul Ticher
> > 0116 273 8191
> > 22 Stoughton Drive North, Leicester LE5 5UB
> >
> > I hereby require any recipient of this message not to use my personal
> > data
> > for direct marketing purposes.
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "datap" <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 10:29 AM
> > Subject: Re: Public domain if disclosed in court?
> >
> >
> >> John,
> >>
> >> Whilst there is no duty of confidentiality attached to such
> >> information
> >> (see case below), there is still a right to privacy.  Technically the
> >> only people who should be privvy to this information within your
> >> organisation are the individual, the line management and any HR
> >> professionals involved.
> >>
> >> Whilst convictions are pronounced in open court, due to rehabilitation
> >> and the article 8 rights to privacy, convictions information should
> >> only
> >> be asked for and given where necessary justifed and proportionate.
> >> This
> >> also allows rehabilitation to occur.  To 'further publicise' (see
> >> PECK v
> >> UK, ECHR, CCTV footage of attempted suicide in public street given to
> >> and broadcast in media) can attract damages.
> >>
> >> Were this not the case, All convictions would be available on a
> >> national database for anyone to browse and the Police national
> >> computer
> >> would be public domian information.  As it happens at present court
> >> records are only searchable by time, date and place of conviction, so
> >> unless you were in court at the time or know the exact time, date and
> >> place of conviction it would make it extremely hard for this to be
> >> 'public knowledge'.
> >>
> >> That being said, were the local papers/press/medis to have published
> >> this information, then you are hardly telling anyone anything that
> >> isn't
> >> already in the public domain at that time?  If this is not the case it
> >> may even be a breach to state that 'an individual' has been charged
> >> with
> >> the misconduct, as people are likely to deduce the identity of the
> >> individual.  I assume you would claim a s34 exemption, or reason 5 of
> >> schedule 3.
> >>
> >> Without knowing details of the misconduct it is difficult to go
> >> further
> >> - if the misconduct was a highly public affair (example of Nick
> >> Leeson,
> >> or beating a client in the public reception) - it is likely that this
> >> information is public anyway.
> >>
> >> Hope this helps
> >
> >> Elliot v Chief Constable of Wiltshire
> >> (Times Law Reports 11 July 1997)
> >> No duty of confidentiality attached to convictions pronounced in open
> >> court
> >> 810H,
> >>
> >>
> >> Ralph T B O'Brien
> >> Group Data Protection Officer
> >> Metropolitan Housing Group
> >> 020 8829 8070
> >> [log in to unmask]
> >>
> >> Cambridge House
> >> 109 Mayes Road
> >> Wood Green
> >> London N22 6UR
> >>
> >> www.mht-group.co.uk
> >>
> >> Views expressed may be those of the sender and may not reflect
> >> Metropolitan Housing Groups policy.
> >>
> >>>>> John Hughes <[log in to unmask]> 12/05/2004 09:44:30 >>>
> >> A bit of advice please ...........
> >>
> >> A group email has recently been sent to all members of staff to inform
> >> them
> >> that a former member of staff is currently in court charged with
> >> alleged
> >> serious misconduct.  The email names the person, includes details of
> >> the
> >> charges and details of when the person worked here and in which
> >> department.
> >>
> >> I have queried this on a number of counts, not least that it was not
> >> necessary to disclose all this information to all members of staff.
> >> The
> >> response has been that it was done to inform everyone of the facts in
> >> case
> >> they field an external call - also that the information is in the
> >> public
> >> domain as it is being quoted in open court.
> >>
> >> Can anyone give me some guidance?  Does the fact that this person is
> >> currently up in court for "alleged" offences justify disclosure of
> >> both
> >> personal data (employment details) and sensitive personal data
> >> (offences) to
> >> everyone in his previous place of employment on the grounds that it is
> >> now
> >> in the public domain?
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> John
> >>
> >> John Hughes
> >> Data Protection Officer
> >> Extension 5671
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >>        All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
> >>       available to the world wide web community at large at
> >>       http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html
> >>       If you wish to leave this list please send the command
> >>        leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
> >>             All user commands can be found at : -
> >>         http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/commandref.htm
> >>   (all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please)
> >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >>
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> ----
> >> ------------------------------------------
> >> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> >> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom
> >> they are addressed.
> >> If you have received this email in error please notify the
> >> originator of the message. This footer also confirms that this
> >> email message has been scanned for the presence of computer viruses.
> >>
> >> Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
> >> sender, except where the sender specifies and with authority,
> >> states them to be the views of Metropolitan Housing Trust Ltd.
> >>
> >> Metropolitan Housing Trust Limited is Charitable, registered under the
> >> Industrial and Provident Societies Act 1965  No. 16337R.
> >>
> >> Metropolitan Home ownership is Charitable, registered under the
> >> Industrial and Provident Societies Act 1965  No. 16337R.
> >>
> >> Stepforward is Charitable, registered under the Industrial and
> >> Provident
> >> Societies Act 1965  No. 16337R.
> >>
> >> MHT Social Investment Foundation is Charitable, registered under the
> >> Industrial and Provident Societies Act 1965  No. 28795R.
> >>
> >> Refugee Housing Association Limited is Charitable, registered under
> >> the
> >> Industrial and Provident Societies Act 1965  No. 20735R.
> >>
> >> Rushcliffe Homes Limited is registered with the Charity
> >> Commission: No. 1095063.
> >>
> >> Scanning of this message and addition of this footer is performed
> >> by SurfControl E-mail Filter software in conjunction with
> >> virus detection software.
> >>
> >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >>        All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
> >>       available to the world wide web community at large at
> >>       http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html
> >>       If you wish to leave this list please send the command
> >>        leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
> >>             All user commands can be found at : -
> >>         http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/commandref.htm
> >>   (all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please)
> >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >>
> >
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >        All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
> >       available to the world wide web community at large at
> >       http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html
> >       If you wish to leave this list please send the command
> >        leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
> >             All user commands can be found at : -
> >         http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/commandref.htm
> >   (all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please)
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>        All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
>       available to the world wide web community at large at
>       http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html
>       If you wish to leave this list please send the command
>        leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
>             All user commands can be found at : -
>         http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/commandref.htm
>   (all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
       All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
      available to the world wide web community at large at
      http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html
      If you wish to leave this list please send the command
       leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
            All user commands can be found at : -
        http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/commandref.htm
  (all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager