I think I may say, tongue in cheek, of course, "Brat!!!!!"
I will now set about swapping the O and I keys on my keyboard
-----Original Message-----
From: This list is for those interested in Data Protection issues
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Maurice Frankel
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 2:56 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [data-protection] Access Request .........a Friday one.......
....
On 1 Oct 2004, at 14:43, Tim Trent wrote:
> was insufficient to identify a loving individual
An endearing reinterpretation of the DPA...!
Maurice Frankel
> One has to look, here at several aspects. I am going to play devil's
> advocate, since it is Friday.
>
> When the person lodged the complaint were they made aware that their
> letter of complaint might be passed in whole or in part to the person
> complained of, and if so under what circumstances? I do know that by
> removing their perosnal details c was insufficient to identify a
> loving individual, but one might also argue that, even with identity
> expunged, the content of the letter might of itself identify the
> writer! Now the person complained of is a third party, so passing
> that data to the third party might well be inappropriate for solely
> that reason.
>
> Let us assume you choose not to disclose. Who is being protected by
> non disclosure and why is that protection warranted, and what are they
> being protected against? Is there a fisticuff likely to take place?
> In which case, ignoring who is in the right totally, is it lawful to
> disclose "knowing" that a fisticuff might well ensue?
>
> I think I might take the entire 40 days to disclose it, you know. And
> bring forward whatever hearing is to happen to be in that timeframe
> too.
>
> Or, more reasonably, I would delegate this to my lawyer.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: This list is for those interested in Data Protection issues
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Broom, Doreen
> Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 2:31 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [data-protection] Access Request .........a Friday
> one.......
> ....
>
> ***** This email was sent via the INTERNET *****
>
> It goes under staff issues and is amongst several.....................
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Trent [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: 01 October 2004 14:19
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Access Request .........a Friday
> one....... ....
>
> ***** This email was received from the INTERNET *****
>
> Disclosure is unavoidable. Provided, of course, that the
> letter is in a
> filing system capable of systematic retrieval, not exempted by
> Durant, and
> that the systematic retrieval is with reference to the SAR
> issuer.
>
> It reminds me in many ways of objections to planning
> permission, which the
> applicant is entitled to see, seemingly without the objector's
> name being
> expunged
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: This list is for those interested in Data Protection
> issues
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Broom,
> Doreen
> Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 2:12 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [data-protection] Access Request .........a
> Friday one.......
> ....
>
> ***** This email was sent via the INTERNET *****
>
> Further info.........this is a minefield................it is
> the person's
> ex-partner making the allegations - person is a school bus
> driver - so you
> can imagine the allegations...and there have been assaults
> etc.on the driver
> by the ex-partner's family. I think we have to disclose but
> will re-type
> the letter.
> What do you all think?
> D
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ian Mansbach [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
> available to the world wide web community at large at
> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html
> If you wish to leave this list please send the command
> leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
> All user commands can be found at : -
> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/commandref.htm
> (all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
> available to the world wide web community at large at
> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html
> If you wish to leave this list please send the command
> leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
> All user commands can be found at : -
> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/commandref.htm
> (all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
available to the world wide web community at large at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html
If you wish to leave this list please send the command
leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
All user commands can be found at : -
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/commandref.htm
(all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
available to the world wide web community at large at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html
If you wish to leave this list please send the command
leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
All user commands can be found at : -
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/commandref.htm
(all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|