JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DATA-PROTECTION Archives


DATA-PROTECTION Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Archives


data-protection@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Home

DATA-PROTECTION Home

DATA-PROTECTION  2004

DATA-PROTECTION 2004

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: photos in exhibitions

From:

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Ian Welton <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:20:31 -0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (229 lines)

Cashmore, Stuart on Friday, January 09, 2004 at 11:18 asked:-

> Why is it ok in some
> circumstances to take pictures of complete strangers without
> there consent but not at other times?

You are speaking of part of the public/private divide or privacy.

Amongst the photographic community there seem to be many opinions on this
matter, much as within DP.

See http://www.people.virginia.edu/~ds8s/peter-m/peter-top.html For one
practitioners approach which I have noted.

It does rather seem that defining a purpose for a photograph is not
something always considered when an image is taken, subsequently used,
repeatedly used, or re-utilised.

Could it be more to do with the interests of the photographer, or the
interests of the data subject(s) and which is paramount in each of the
circumstance(s) and purpose(s) in which the material is gathered and may be
available for use for? And as DP practitioners, we will all be aware of how
difficult, almost impossible at times, it is to maintain use for the
original purpose.

Ian W

> -----Original Message-----
> From: This list is for those interested in Data Protection
> issues [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
> Cashmore, Stuart
> Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 11:18 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: photos in exhibitions
>
>
> I actually broadly agree with you - I have the utmost respect
> for peoples' privacy and would never take a picture that I
> thought would cause offence. Of course, the subject and I
> might not agree as to whether or not it causes offence...
>
> What I am interested in is the boundaries of "public place"
> and "right to privacy". For instance, I spent some time
> visiting the Roman remains at Pompeii recently and took lots
> of pictures (100+) of the site. By the very nature of a place
> like that - a major tourist attraction - it was very crowded.
> Some of my pictures, try as I might, unfortunately include
> other tourists (I would actually they weren't in shot).
> Should I have asked their permission to include them?
>
> If the answer is yes then we must all give up taking pictures
> of anything in which there are people other than those from
> whom we can get explicit permission to be included. So forget
> your holiday snaps unless you can guarantee no strangers are
> in shot. Which brings me back to my earlier point about
> people in football crowds.
>
> The common sense answer (I hope) is no - and this is the
> boundary I am interested in. Why is it ok in some
> circumstances to take pictures of complete strangers without
> there consent but not at other times?
>
> Stuart
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Turner,Tim (Corporate Resources)
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: 09 January 2004 11:05
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: photos in exhibitions
>
> But does this mean that if you don't leave the house with a
> bag on your head, you're fair game? Admittedly, the bag might
> itself make one worthy of a photograph, but the logical
> consequence of what you're saying is that a camera is an
> automatic licence to capture any image one chooses to.
>
> Little kids in playgrounds, and road accidents are two
> examples of things happening in public places, but I don't
> imagine amateur snappers would be queuing up with their
> Nikons in those instances. And who defines a public place?
> Surely if you don't draw your curtains, someone might claim
> you're making yourself public. But if someone gets their
> camera out because an "interesting" picture beckons, I think
> an emphatic right to some measure of privacy might be
> asserted - with fists, if nothing else. Nothing stops the
> photographer taking the picture and then asking for
> permission to use it afterwards - and if you think the person
> might say no, or feel uncomfortable, does that put the
> "snatched" picture in a different light?
>
> Tim Turner
> Data and Information Security Officer
> Derbyshire County Council
> Tel: 01629 580000 ext 7373
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: This list is for those interested in Data Protection issues
> [SMTP:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Cashmore, Stuart
> > Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 10:46 AM
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: [data-protection] photos in exhibitions
> >
> > Tim's response to my (deliberately provocative) e-mail misses the
> > point. Being a face in a crowd doesn't make you any less
> recognisable
> > in a still photo, and TV images can have individual images frozen -
> > and that's
> without
> > getting into really complicated image manipulation. In any
> case, where
> does
> > a "crowd" start? Ok, I have to get permission from a single
> person, or
> > a couple. But what about 20 people, or 50, or 100? When does Tim's
> > "crowd" begin?
> >
> > National newspapers tend to send a single photographer to a
> football
> > match
> -
> > a "lone" photographer". So he/she would have to ask everyone for
> > consent
> if
> > he/she took a picture of the crowd? Whereas the dozen or so
> TV camera
> > operators at a typical Premiership match wouldn't have to?
> >
> > As a keen amateur photographer myself I often take pictures
> of people
> > - sometimes individuals, sometimes groups - in public
> places because I
> > think they make interesting photos. I rarely know if the picture I
> > take is one that I will wish to exhibit until (i) I see the
> finished
> > product and (ii)
> an
> > exhibition opportunity arises for which the photo would be
> suitable.
> > Do I ask permission on spec? Also, many pictures "work"
> because they
> > are
> snatched
> > moments, taken when the subject is unaware and so is doing
> something
> > completely natural. If you had to ask permission beforehand
> then many
> > photos, widely acclaimed on artistic grounds, would simply
> not exist.
> >
> > In actual fact I think in this specific case the
> photographer WAS in
> > the wrong - he/she knew specifically that it was being taken for
> > exhibition - but I don't think you can generalise in the
> way that many
> > contributors
> have
> > suggested.
> >
> > Stuart
> >
>
> **********************************************************************
> WARNING!!
> The information in this email is confidential and may be
> legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee.
> Unauthorised access to this email by anyone else is
> prohibited. If you have received this email in error or are
> reading it without authorisation, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in
> reliance on it, is prohibited by Derbyshire County Council
> and may be unlawful.
>
> Senders and recipients of email should be aware that under
> the Data Protection act 1998 [and the Freedom of Information
> Act 2000], the contents may have to be disclosed to a request.
>
> **********************************************************************
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
> available to the world wide web community at large at
> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html
> If you wish to leave this list please send the command
> leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
> All user commands can be found at : -
> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/commandref.htm
> (all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list
> please)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------
> The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and
> is intended only for the named recipient(s). If you are not
> the intended recipient you must not copy, distribute, or take
> any action or reliance on it. If you have received this
> e-mail in error, please notify the sender. Any unauthorised
> disclosure of the information contained in this e-mail is
> strictly prohibited.
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
> available to the world wide web community at large at
> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html
> If you wish to leave this list please send the command
> leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
> All user commands can be found at : -
> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/commandref.htm
> (all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list
> please)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
       All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
      available to the world wide web community at large at
      http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html
      If you wish to leave this list please send the command
       leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
            All user commands can be found at : -
        http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/commandref.htm
  (all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager