JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DIS-FORUM Archives


DIS-FORUM Archives

DIS-FORUM Archives


DIS-FORUM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DIS-FORUM Home

DIS-FORUM Home

DIS-FORUM  2003

DIS-FORUM 2003

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Dislexia 'diagnosis'

From:

Geoff Coates <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Discussion list for disabled students and their support staff.

Date:

Wed, 23 Apr 2003 16:37:45 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (46 lines)

Hi Andy

Bridging the Gap is out of date on this one.  The DFES has been changing the rules again.....  Latest guidance on suitable diagnosis of Dyslexia is contained in their guidance to LEA Awards Officers released on 13th March.  The full DSA guidance is part of Chapter 7a (the url is http://www.dfes.gov.uk/studentsupport/administrators/dsp_section_53_10.9.shtml 

The relevant bit on diagnosis starts on page 36 and is as follows:

DIAGNOSTIC EVIDENCE OF DYSLEXIA

C31     Diagnostic evidence of dyslexia in higher education requires the use of sophisticated psychometric techniques which are only available to psychologists with appropriate training.  Therefore, for DSA purposes, evidence of dyslexia should only be accepted when provided by a chartered psychologist with a current practising certificate (this is the actual name of the certificate) which is available to all chartered psychologists who pay a small fee. A copy of the Register of Chartered Psychologists is available from the British Psychological Society (The British Psychological Society, St. Andrews House, 48 Princess Road East, Leicester LE1 7DR, tel. 0116 254 9568). 

C32     The tests used in the diagnostic assessment should be either the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Test (WAIS) or the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC).  If the diagnostic evidence is more than 2 years old at the time of entry to HE, the student should be required to undergo an 'Assessment of Performance Attainment' which would provide an update on their current performance in reading, writing and spelling.   A new 'Assessment of Performance' should be requested when the diagnostic report is more than two years old at the time of entry to higher education regardless of the student's age when the diagnostic assessment was carried out.  Cognitive functioning is unlikely to change even if the student was diagnosed as a child and there is no requirement for a reassessment of cognitive functioning to be carried out.  However, reading, writing and spelling could change in adulthood.  The 'Assessment of Performance Attainment is a 'top up' diagnosis which provides up to date evidence of the student's current degree of difficulty in reading, writing and spelling.  The top up diagnosis should be based on standardised tests suitable for adults, such as the Wider Range Achievement Tests (WRAT) and Woodcock Reading Mastery Test (WRMT).  LEAs may also wish to consult section 145 of the Report of the National Working Party on Dyslexia in Higher Education (published in January 1999) for further advice on suitable 'top up' tests.  The Assessment of Performance Attainment is part of the diagnosis and the cost should be met by the student.  The Assessment of Performance Attainment could be accepted if carried out by a Special Needs Teacher or other psychologists, such as clinical or occupational psychologists, who are not chartered.  
C33     The assessment of a higher education student for dyslexia should contain the following evidence:
·     evidence of any significant difficulties in reading, writing, spelling and numeracy relevant to the standards in these skills required in higher education;
·     evidence of a significant discrepancy between the abilities in reading, writing, spelling and numeracy and the level of those abilities expected of the student in terms of their general intellectual ability;
·     evidence of cognitive disabilities or neurological anomalies (memory, visual perception, phonological processing or motor coordination) which are likely to have adverse effects on learning; and
·     evidence that the learning difficulties identified are likely to affect learning in higher education.
C34     The diagnostic report will usually contain a brief summary of recommended support for the dyslexic student based on the professional opinion of the psychologist.  It should be remembered that psychologists are not familiar with the student's institution or with the latest developments in technology.  Therefore, it is still necessary for a separate assessment of needs to be carried out to identify the appropriate course related support and the psychologists summary of recommended support should not be accepted in lieu of a full assessment of course-related needs.      
C35     The diagnostic report should state that, in the professional opinion of the chartered psychologist, because the student has dyslexia he should receive extra support to compensate for these difficulties.  The diagnostic report will often classify the dyslexia into 3 bands, severe, moderate and mild.  Mild dyslexia does not always mean that the student will encounter mild problems as mild dyslexia can cause severe problems and still need support to compensate.  Therefore, the written report of a relevant specialist or expert whose qualifications have been checked should be sufficient to enable the student to proceed to the next stage of the process, the assessment of course related needs.  There is no requirement for LEAs to consider the level or severity of dyslexia.  The judgement on eligibility of chartered psychologists should be accepted unless it can be shown that the supporting evidence is inadequate to have reasonably formed a view; for example, the evidence is out of date, irrelevant to the applicant or very cursory.  In such circumstances, further information should be sought and the views of university Disability Officers should also be taken into account.   

C36     It should be noted that only chartered psychologists are qualified to administer the WAIS test.  Therefore, there should be no need for the LEA's educational psychologist to provide a second opinion where the diagnosis has already been provided by a chartered psychologist. However, if an LEA is dissatisfied with the written evidence provided on dyslexia it can seek further evidence or request a new full diagnostic report. 





Geoff Coates
Assistive Technology Adviser
University of Central Lancashire
Student Services
Marsh Building
Preston PR1 2HE
Tel: 01772 892601
Fax: 01772 892939
email: [log in to unmask]

>>> [log in to unmask] 04/23/03 03:14pm >>>
Dear Colleagues. I would be grateful for your advice on this matter which I
hope is of much wider interest. I am puzzled about the wording of the  new
bridging the gap booklet about who is the suitable qualified person to
conduct 'diagnosis' of dyslexia. In last year's booklet the DES made it
relativelly more specific : "someone with a qualification from a
professional training course involving assessing adults with dyslexia, such
as an OCR Diploma in Specific Learning Difficulties". There is no such
paragraph in this year's booklet. Your thoughts and advice would be very
much appreacited. Best regards, Andy Velarde Disability Coordinator _UKC

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager