JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DIS-FORUM Archives


DIS-FORUM Archives

DIS-FORUM Archives


DIS-FORUM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DIS-FORUM Home

DIS-FORUM Home

DIS-FORUM  2003

DIS-FORUM 2003

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: caseload

From:

"E.A.Du Pre" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Discussion list for disabled students and their support staff.

Date:

Thu, 4 Dec 2003 17:53:07 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (214 lines)

Agreed in principle, but do beware of generalisations about 'students
with dyslexic type difficulties' or the amount of advisory
work/guidance/liaison with departments that may be needed.....


SUE JEPSON wrote:
> All advisory work with students will tend to be time consuming when
> carried out by caring and informed staff. Surely the equation should
> also contain reference to the level and type of advisory work, e.g.
> advising students with a hearing impairment and making recommendations
> to lecturers would be likely to be different in nature and demands on
> time to the on-going advice and guidance for students with dyslexic type
> difficulties.
>
>
>>>>[log in to unmask] 12/4/03 12:01:44 >>>
>>>
> Just to add to Steve's comments re staffing levels quoted below, from
> the
> HEFCE Guidance on Base-Level provision report:-
>
> Bear in mind that these figures were quoted when fewer students
> disclosed a
> disability (therefore the figures based on total student numbers are
> meaningless now). Also, at that time, the DSA was not as widely
> available
> as it is now (ie no pt or pg or diploma DSAs). There was no SENDA. In
> real
> terms, the workload of professionals in HE disability services has
> increased
> dramatically (as we all know). 1 adviser to 200 students is nowhere
> near
> enough - 1:100 might be more realistic.
>
> Wouldn't it be helpful to those of us on the shopfloor if this report
> (or at
> least this part of the guidance) could be updated and more realistic
> figures
> provided - and then sent round to our VCs??
>
> I know from conversations that I have had with colleagues how many are
> finding it difficult to cope with workloads - all the more so as they
> are
> caring professionals who want to provide the best possible service to
> their
> students.
>
> Happy Christmas everybody!
>
> ********************************
> Elaine Shillcock
> Head - Disability Support Office
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Discussion list for disabled students and their support staff.
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Steven Metcalfe
> Sent: 04 December 2003 10:56
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: caseload
>
>
> Liz,
> This is now a bit old but may help:
>
> HEFCE Ref 99/04
>
> January 1999
> Guidance on base-level provision for disabled students in higher
> education
> institutions
>
> Dedicated staff
>
> To deliver this base-level provision, institutions will need dedicated
> staff
> resources. As a minimum we believe that each HEI should employ a
> dedicated
> co-ordinator as a permanent member of staff. Given the range of work
> involved, the need to deal expeditiously with individual and personal
> needs,
> and the time-absorbing nature of this work either of the following
> possible
> approaches would be realistic in determining the number of dedicated
> staff:
>
> staffing based on total student numbers
>
> Size of institution FTE posts
> up to 3,000 students 0.5
> 5,000 students 1.0
> 10,000 students 2.0
> 15,000 students 3.0
> 20,000 students 4.0
>
> staffing based student numbers, with a ratio of one co-ordinator to
> 200
> students with disabilities.
>
> Such staffing will allow for a more proactive approach to planning and
> providing services for students with disabilities, and should give a
> greater
> capacity to monitor whether agreed services are actually delivered.
> For
> larger institutions a team of staff, each specialising in the needs of
> particular groups of students, may be most appropriate. This could
> include,
> for example, a general disability co-ordinator, a co-ordinator for
> deaf
> students, a co-ordinator for visually impaired students and a
> co-ordinator
> for students with mental health problems. Some staff resources might
> be
> devoted to IT issues.
>
> The senior co-ordinator needs sufficient authority to be able to
> intervene
> at any level within the institution. We propose that a member of the
> senior
> management team should be responsible for monitoring policies, and to
> whom
> the senior co-ordinator should have access, whatever line-management
> arrangements are adopted by the institution.
>
> We have been struck by the amount of detailed administrative work that
> falls
> to co-ordinators. To function effectively they require administrative
> back-up, which we propose be based on the following
> ratios:
>
> FTE disability posts FTE administrative posts
> 0.5 0.5
> 1.0 0.5
> 2.0 1.0
> 3.0 2.0
> 4.0 2.5
>
> Steve Metcalfe
> Head of DART
> University of Lincoln
> Phone: 01522 886400
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Discussion list for disabled students and their support staff.
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Liz Thompson
> Sent: 02 December 2003 13:04
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: FW: caseload
>
>
>>Dear Everyone.
>>
>>Is anyone aware of recommendations for the size of caseload for
>
> someone
>
>>working with students who have specific learning
>
> difficulties/dyslexia. If
>
>>not, what are your ideas for a reasonable caseload for a full-time
>
> worker?
>
>>I'm thinking of co-ordination of arrangements rather than tutoring,
>
> like
>
>>recommending exam arrangements, referring for tutoring or IT support,
>
>
>>interviewing students, liasing with academic staff and LEAs and so
>
> on.
>
>>Any thoughts appreciated.
>>
>>Liz
>
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
> are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
> the system manager.
> This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
> Sophos Anti Virus for the presence of computer viruses.
> www.mimesweeper.com
> **********************************************************************



--

--

________________________________________________
Liz Du Pre
Student Tutor
Dyslexia Unit
University of Wales, Bangor
Bryn Deiniol,Penrallt Road,Bangor
Gwynedd LL57 2DG
phone:01248 383843
fax:01248 383614
email:[log in to unmask]

________________________________________________
2003 Bangor Dyslexia Conference 24th - 26th July
www.dyslexia.bangor.ac.uk
________________________________________________

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager