In a message dated 02/10/03 09:03:11 GMT Daylight Time, [log in to unmask]
writes:
<< My suggestion would be a discussion btw DO and assessor (something that
has been discussed on this list endlessly in the past) which agrees
some kind of alternative whilst attempts are made to develop the relevant
service. I would have thought this is the minimum that would be
required under that 'arm' of the law.
If it proved impossible/unreasonable for developments to be implemented,
then so be it, but surely this would be more in line with the
spirit of the DDA? Naturally, the results of this discussion would also need
to be communicated to the student.
Would this not be a fair approach? >>
I don't know if that is any clearer than my ramblings on the issue. I think
perhaps we need to decide what the assessor should whether or not the HEI
doesn't offer this service.
Let's see what others think.
Mick
|