JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DIS-FORUM Archives


DIS-FORUM Archives

DIS-FORUM Archives


DIS-FORUM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DIS-FORUM Home

DIS-FORUM Home

DIS-FORUM  2003

DIS-FORUM 2003

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Assessment Reports

From:

"Dixon, Mary" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Discussion list for disabled students and their support staff.

Date:

Mon, 18 Aug 2003 15:55:59 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (146 lines)

Thanks, that's just what I wanted.

Mary

-----Original Message-----
From: Katherine Henderson [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 18 August 2003 15:17
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Assessment Reports


The revised guidance is in Chapter 7a of the Student Support Notes of
Guidance (pages 35 -36)

 http://www.dfes.gov.uk/studentsupport/administrators/doc/ACF4225.doc

Dyslexia Screening

C30 Screening for dyslexia usually precedes a diagnostic assessment and
the purpose is to determine whether a full psychological or diagnostic
assessment would be warranted. Screening can save the cost of a full
diagnostic assessment in cases where the outcome of screening suggests that
a full diagnostic assessment would be unwarranted. The Bangor Dyslexia
Test, Dyslexia Adult Screening Test (DAST), the Dyslexia Test and Quick
Scan are examples of screening tests, although there are other screening
test. Screening for dyslexia does not constitute a diagnostic assessment
of dyslexia and therefore LEAs should not accept a screening for dyslexia
as the sole evidence of dyslexia. There is no requirement for a student to
undergo a screening for dyslexia when providing their evidence of dyslexia
for HE purposes.


Full Diagnostic evidence of dyslexia

C31 It is recommended that diagnostic reports provided by chartered,
educational, clinical and occupational psychologists or other qualified
individuals, usually teachers with a qualification in assessing students
with specific learning difficulties, are accepted as evidence of dyslexia.
Teachers who assess dyslexia should hold a qualification from an advanced
training course involving the assessment of adults for dyslexia which is
recognised by the British Dyslexia Association's (BDA) Accreditation Board.
A list of qualifications from courses accredited by the BDA is contained at
Appendix 10 in this chapter. Information is also available on the BDA
website:

www.bda-dyslexia.org.uk/main/accreditation


C32 It is recommended that a full diagnostic assessment of a higher
education student for dyslexia should contain the following evidence:


· evidence of any significant difficulties in reading, writing,
spelling and numeracy relevant to the standards in these skills required in
higher education;
· evidence of a significant discrepancy between the abilities in
reading, writing, spelling and numeracy and the level of those abilities
expected of the student in terms of their general intellectual ability;
· evidence of cognitive disabilities or neurological anomalies (memory,
visual perception, phonological processing or motor coordination) which are
likely to have adverse effects on learning; and
· evidence that the learning difficulties identified are likely to
affect learning in higher education.
C33 Once that an LEA has accepted a diagnostic report there is no
requirement for a student to undergo a new diagnosis later in the course.
A diagnostic report accepted for a first course should also be acceptable
for subsequent courses, including postgraduate courses.


C34 If the diagnosis was carried out before the age of 16, the student
should normally be asked to undergo an 'Assessment of Performance
Attainment' which would provide an update on their current performance in
reading, writing and spelling. Intelligence is unlikely to change
significantly even if the student was diagnosed as a child and therefore
there is no requirement for another assessment of intelligence. However,
reading, writing and spelling could change in adulthood. The 'Assessment
of Performance Attainment is a 'top up' diagnosis which provides up to date
evidence of the student's current degree of difficulty in reading, writing
and spelling. The top up diagnosis is to establish the likely impact of the
student's specific learning difficulties on the skills needed for higher
education. The top up diagnosis should be based on standardised tests
suitable for adults, for example, the Wider Range Achievement Tests (WRAT)
and Woodcock Reading Mastery Test (WRMT). LEAs may also wish to consult
section 145 of the Report of the National Working Party on Dyslexia in
Higher Education (published in January 1999) for further advice on tests
and general advice on dyslexia in higher education. Copies of this
publication may be obtained from the University of Hull, Dept. of
Psychology (tel. 01482 466154). The Assessment of Performance Attainment
is part of the diagnosis and the cost should be met by the student,
although an application may be made to the institution's discretionary
Hardship Fund to meet the cost. The Assessment of Performance Attainment
could be carried out by a Special Needs Teacher or qualified psychologists.



C35 The diagnostic report should state that because the student has
dyslexia he should receive extra support to compensate for these
difficulties. The diagnostic report will often classify the dyslexia into 3
bands, severe, moderate and mild. Mild dyslexia does not always mean that
the student will encounter mild problems as mild dyslexia can cause severe
problems and still need support to compensate. Therefore, the written
report of a relevant specialist or expert whose qualifications have been
checked should be sufficient to enable the student to proceed to the next
stage of the process, the assessment of course related needs. There is no
requirement for LEAs to consider the level or severity of dyslexia. The
judgement on eligibility made by a qualified professional should be
accepted unless it can be shown that the supporting evidence is inadequate
to have reasonably formed a view; for example, the evidence is out of date,
irrelevant to the applicant or very cursory. In such circumstances, further
information should be sought and the views of university Disability
Officers should also be taken into account.

C36 There should be no need for the LEA's educational psychologist to
provide a second opinion on a diagnosis already made by another
professional. However, if an LEA is dissatisfied with the written evidence
provided on dyslexia it can seek further evidence or request a new full
diagnostic report.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------

Kath Henderson
Team Leader - Student Support
Education Department
Overseas House
PO Box 191
Quay Street
Manchester Tel. No: 0161 234 7076
M3 3ST Fax No: 0161 234 7004





**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept
for the presence of computer viruses.

Please contact [log in to unmask]
with any queries.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager