Interesting. My thought is to press as much as we can for a better wording
now. A better wording may not stop the bill. Andy
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ian Francis" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 2:36 PM
Subject: Re: Essential texts - copyright. Your students need youremails!
> Ian L
> I don't want to seem negative, but after reading this, personally I'd
> avoid doing anything that might stop this bill going through as it's been
> such a long campaign to get things sorted out for blind and partially
> sighted readers. As she says "The Joint Industry Guidelines are not being
> replaced by this Bill." so maybe it's better to carry on working with the
> CLA and others on extending these first? Has anyone trawled through the
> DDA to see if there's anything in there that might already be useful?
>
> Ian Francis
>
> On 30 Jul 2002 at 14:05, Ian Litterick wrote:
>
> > Judith
> >
> > Thanks for your clarification, which is very helpful. I will forward
> > this to disforum, with this message, as you have to be a member to post
> > messages.
> >
> > However, I have some difficulty in reconciling what you say with the
> > European Copyright Directive, to which the Bill is, presumably, partly a
> ...
>
|