Oh I've tried so hard to bite my tongue - really I have :)
Surely the best way to ensure that your time as assessors isn't wasted is
to recommend a generic specification rather than giving full brand,
model, costings etc etc. We are one of those LEA's that uses their own
suppliers so all I need to know is what software is required and what
specification of PC is needed to run that software satisfactorily. For
those LEA's that still insist on multiple quotes, again all that is
needed is a spec on which those quotes should be based. I know most
Access Centres tend to have their own preferred supplier but is it
absolutely necessary to promote that supplier in a report that should be
addressing needs rather than means.
St.John Skeates
Awards Section
Bedfordshire County Council
-----Original Message-----
From: TERRY HART [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 10:35 AM
To: [log in to unmask]; Skeates,St.John DEAL Awards Tm
Subject: Re: LEAs and providing equipment
In response to the message left on Disforum by Mick Trott
From: Michael Trott <[log in to unmask]>
I was interested to read the move by some of the LEA's re getting
multiple quotes. This LEA was the first I had come across in a very
long time and we deal with a reasonable amount of LEA's as a major
Access Centre. I do hope that this is not a growing trend as it is a
classic waste of our time as assessors and it invariably leaves the
student with a second rate solution.
Certainly the majority of LEA's in the South West have adopted a
policy where they order direct from their prefered supplier, thereby
reducing wasted effort whilst giving an improved service. My
understanding of the new system that is being introduced is that
there will be an agreed list of suppliers and only one quote will be
required, reflecting the sort of trend seen here in the South West.
Whatever method is imposed we need to spend more time providing good
working solutions than chasing our tails trying to find the bargain
of the month. As has been said many times before on DISFORUM there is
more to providing technology than securing a discount system, it is
essential for the supplier to understand the special needs of the
disabled user and be able to provide a whole package of
specialist technology, software and support. The suppliers who give
the lowest quote either do not survive in business for very long or
they are in a market place where profit is made by volume sales not
an overall specialist service. A " NEVER MIND THE QUALITY FEEL THE
WIDTH" policy is surely one we should all be avoiding if we are
to give the levels of service required and now expected.
I am now off my soap box and will not write on the subject again,
unless provoked.
Terry Hart
*********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed.
If you receive this e-mail by mistake, please advise the sender immediately
by using the reply facility in your e-mail software.
Please also destroy and delete the message from your computer.
Any modification of the contents of this e-mail is strictly prohibited
unless expressly authorised by the sender.
*********************************************************************
|