Hmmm, I have Dragon 6 installed on a desktop and I've tried it with a
pile of mics and several hours of training (not to mention a few
reinstalls). It's shaky from session to session, including transcribing
the same audio files saved on the HDD. It just reminds me of OCR a few
generations ago. I wish it would work with some stability: there's
buckets of applications for it if it were reliable. That's why I've
played with it so much.
Regards, Bernard
On Thu, 26 Sep 2002 14:23:53 EDT Michael Trott <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
> In a message dated 26/09/02 12:46:37 GMT Daylight Time, [log in to unmask]
> writes:
>
> << Unlike contributors to another thread on this list, I have found
> Dragon takes a lot of training to get anything like a useable level of
> accuracy, particularly if you are a using a highly technical or
> specialist vocabulary. >>
>
> I have Dragon 5 on a 1Ghz laptop and it seems to give almost perfect accuracy
> anywhere I demonstrate it, regardless of the room accoustics and despite
> minimal training (one reading of the one training text). However, I also have
> Dragon 6 installed on a fixed location desktop that is much faster and has
> more memory and it is very unreliable despite fixed location, longer training.
> Anyone else found similar problems? If not I can only guess that the
> microphone is inadequate.
>
> Mick Trott
----------------------
Bernard Doherty
Student Adviser
ACCESS Centre
Anglia Polytechnic University
Tel: 01223 363271 x2534
Fax: 01223 417730
Minicom: 01223 576155
[log in to unmask]
|