Is anyone aware of any case law that would contradict the statement ..
"Screening against MPS is best practice, but is not legislated for".
Obviously this centres around fairness of processing and 'that bit'
about "any further information which is necessary ... to enable
processing in respect of the data subject to be fair".
I am not aware of anything specific to Data Protection Act 1998; perhaps
there is something relevant in Data Protection Act 1984?
Regards,
Duncan S Smith
Snr. Consultant
Ashton Court Consultants Ltd, Northampton, UK
T: 01604 864 781 F: 01604 864 611 M: 0777 556 8180
Mailto:[log in to unmask] Web: www.accl.co.uk
----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the
material from any computer.
This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by Norton
Antivirus software for the presence of computer viruses.
Ashton Court Consultants Ltd.
"Harnessing Information for Business Success"
-----------------------------------------------------------------
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
available to the world wide web community at large at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html
If you wish to leave this list please send the command
leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
All user commands can be found at : -
www.jiscmail.ac.uk/user-manual/summary-user-commands.htm
(all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|