JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DIS-FORUM Archives


DIS-FORUM Archives

DIS-FORUM Archives


DIS-FORUM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DIS-FORUM Home

DIS-FORUM Home

DIS-FORUM  2002

DIS-FORUM 2002

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Variation to assessment for non-dysl

From:

"Skeates,St.John DEAL Awards Tm" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Discussion list for disabled students and their support staff.

Date:

Thu, 28 Nov 2002 12:56:00 -0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (121 lines)

Conversely I have a student who has phoned me requesting a laptop because
he has bad handwriting. The author of the report recommending extra exam
time has stated quite clearly that there is no evidence of a Specific
Leaning Difficulty yet his university have informed him he should have no
trouble qualifying for DSA.

We seem to be reaching a point where the definition of disability is
being constantly redefined in order to provide DSA funded support. Given
the ever expanding boundaries of what qualifies for DSA and the plethora
of experts willing to provide evidence of such, I'm starting to feel that
99% of the student population would qualify for DSA if only we probed
hard enough! Since the definition of disability varies wildly depending
on where you look and what you are trying to get out of it (try comparing
the dictionary definition, DDA, DSA, Social Model etc etc), perhaps we
ALL need to take a more responsible stance when it comes to determining
what is and what isn't a disability related need. At the moment DSA is
seen as an endless supply of ready cash and shoe-horning as wide a range
of needs as possible into it allows institutions to absolve themselves of
a large proportion of their own responsibilities towards funding disabled
students. They can then spend their own meagre funding on, what they
would consider to be, more worthwhile causes. However, given the
government's current financial predicament, both generally and
specifically in the area of Higher Education funding, there is a very
real danger that if DSA continues to grow exponentially, the matter will
be taken out of our hands and far more Draconian controls introduced at a
national level.Do any of us really want to see the reintroduction of
means-tested DSA?

The one problem with gravy trains is that eventually they run out of
track!

St.John Skeates
Awards Section
Bedfordshire County Council
Direct Line 01234 316300



 -----Original Message-----
From: Ekaterina Barakhta [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 11:40 AM
To: [log in to unmask]; Skeates,St.John DEAL Awards Tm
Subject: Re: Variation to assessment for non-dyslexic students




Hi Kirsty,
I apologize for the late reply. I have a student coming for an assessment
today who has similar problem that was described by you. He was assessed
by
Chartered Psychologist who clearly stated that 'his academic difficulties
cannot be ascribed to dyslexia, as he shows good reading and spelling
skills.' However this student has a specific impairment in cognition -
namely in the ability to perform even the simpleast tasks at speed.
Obviously this is an effect of his longstanding epilepsy. It is
interesting
that this student was assessed by Dyslexia Institute. However they
clearly
helped to identify what he would need to successfully complete his
studies.
Therefore the assessment was very useful.
My point is, maybe your student has some other health problems which are
totaly dyslexia unrelated however neurological in nature? Because in this
case a student definitely requires extra time in exams, dictaphone in
lectures, maybe voice recognition software etc.

Regards
Ekaterina Barakhta
Development Officer
CATER
Open University
Walton Hall
Milton Keynes
MK7 6AA

 -----Original Message-----
From: Kirsty Mackenzie [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 26 November 2002 11:31
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Variation to assessment for non-dyslexic students


Hi,

How do other HEIs deal with the issue of students whose Educational
Psychologist states that they do not have a specific learning difficulty
but
do require extra time in exams due to slower writing speed (for example)?

If you action these recommendations, is there then an issue of inequity
to
(non-dyslexic) students who have not had an EP assessment? Are you then
in a
position where, in fairness you should then be offering EP assessments to
all students at the institution? (with nigh on 20,000 students, I don't
think our Hardship Fund could stretch to this, let alone our admin
systems!)

Any feedback or advice would be welcomed!

Kirsty

Disability Coordinator
Student Services
University of Brighton
(01273) 642885

*********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed.

If you receive this e-mail by mistake, please advise the sender immediately
by using the reply facility in your e-mail software.
Please also destroy and delete the message from your computer.

Any modification of the contents of this e-mail is strictly prohibited
unless expressly authorised by the sender.
*********************************************************************

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager