JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DATA-PROTECTION Archives


DATA-PROTECTION Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Archives


data-protection@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Home

DATA-PROTECTION Home

DATA-PROTECTION  2001

DATA-PROTECTION 2001

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

RE: The £10.00 Compliance Fee and 'Disproportionate Effort'

From:

Stuart Cashmore <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Stuart Cashmore <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 2 May 2001 09:17:50 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (100 lines)

My company works in the health sector, chiefly with NHS organisations. If
experience there is any guide then I believe you have no choice but to
comply, regardless of cost.

Subject Access Requests in the health field may require not only the
extraction of computerised data, but also the copying of often lengthy
medical records and other "data" such as x-ray images, videos, etc. The cost
is usually substantially greater than the fee chargeable, especially when
clerical effort is added into the equation. Currently a fee of up to £50 is
chargeable if the SAR includes non-computerised data but after October this
will drop to £10, imposing a severe financial burden on NHS organisations.

Stuart Cashmore
Management Information Projects Manager
McKessonHBOC (UK), No. 1 Nine Elms Lane, LONDON SW8 5RR

Tel.    020-7819 5083  (with Voicemail)
Mob.    07799-790019
Fax.    020-7819 5100
e-mail [log in to unmask]
<mailto:[log in to unmask]> 



        -----Original Message-----
        From:   Stephen Harrow [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
        Sent:   02 May 2001 02:21
        To:     [log in to unmask]
        Subject:        The £10.00 Compliance Fee and 'Disproportionate
Effort'

         Colleagues in the HE/FE Sector,

        If an exam candidate submits a Data Subject Access request 
        in the proper way, requiring sight of her/his examination 
        script(s), and the institution believes that it is right to 
        accede for the sake of transparency and because the 
        institution has no saucy examiners' comments to hide and 
        does not wish to find clever ways to frustrate a genuine 
        seeker after knowledge; but it costs the institution, say, 
        £50.00 to comply, since extra staff have to be hired to 
        unearth the scripts from the depths of the warehouse where 
        these are stored, after marking, etc, each November, how 
        may the institution recoup the cost?

        A fee of £10.00 can be charged. Are any other incidental 
        expenses chargeable?  And, if so, how may these be 
        calculated?  Can the measure of 'disproportionate effort' 
        be in some way a function of the extra expense demanded by 
        compliance?  And at what point in totting up the likely 
        cost of compliance can an institution say: 'Enough is 
        enough. We cannot afford to comply, even though we actually 
        want to.'

        Is an institution in that position simply hoist with its 
        own highmindedness?  Presumably, if an institution knows 
        beyond a legal peraventure that it has no personal data in 
        the form of marks or comments on a given examination 
        script, it can charge what it likes to retrieve that script 
        (being exempt from the Data Protection Act under Schedule 
        7/9) if, after being assured that no personal data can be 
        'communicated' from that source, the candidate persists in 
        requesting 'access' (sight of the script) and refuses to 
        accept those assurances. 

        Stephen Harrow
        Data Protection Secretariat
        King's College London
        020 7848 3401
        1 May 2001

        ----------------------
        [log in to unmask]

        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
            If you wish to leave this list please send the command
               leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
                    All user commands can be found at : -
            www.jiscmail.ac.uk/user-manual/summary-user-commands.htm
        all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please!
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and is intended
only for the named recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient you
must not copy, distribute, or take any action or reliance on it.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender.
Any unauthorised disclosure of the information contained in this e-mail
is strictly prohibited.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    If you wish to leave this list please send the command
       leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
            All user commands can be found at : -
    www.jiscmail.ac.uk/user-manual/summary-user-commands.htm
all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please!
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager