In article <sa83c31e.000@GWIATH>, Paula Leon
<[log in to unmask]> writes
>I cannot see where consent would be required, as the post belongs to the
>organisation anyway, because it should relate to business.
>
>What would happen if some staff did not give consent, what would happen to the
>post, if they were sick etc, may this well hinder the business itself.
I have to say that I find it utterly bizarre that anyone (this is not a
personal remark, you represent a large constituency) can hold that view
simultaneously with appending a disclaimer such as:
> This electronic communication (and any attachment) is intended for the
>above named only. It may contain Private / Confidential information. If it
>has come to you in error, please take no action based upon it and neither
>read it or copy it, nor cause its contents to be disclosed to others. If
>you realise an error has been made (or we notify you of an error) please
>completely delete / destroy all electronic / hard copies and phone us (at
>our expense) to let us know this has been done.
or
> This message is intended for the addressee only. It is private,
> confidential and may be covered by legal professional privilege or
> other legal or attorney/client privilege.
Sorry, am I missing something??
--
Roland Perry
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
If you wish to leave this list please send the command
leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
All user commands can be found at : -
www.jiscmail.ac.uk/user-manual/summary-user-commands.htm
all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please!
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|