Being 'vulnerable' doesnt remove your rights, but social services will have a duty of care under other legislation, especially if there are children
involved, and all circumstances need to be looked at before a family is evicted on the grounds of rent arrears, for example.
The disclosure needs to be enough to provide care for the client. Social Services, Housing depts and those providing housing, will need to make it
clear on application forms who information may be shared with and the reason (ie client care, fraud prevention, assessment of benefit, Council tax
assessment) and get a signature.
It is always a difficult one as staff from social services are sometimes reluctant to share information with housing and housing associations if it
is going to prejudice the care of their client and there is sometimes general suspicion from housing benefits staff that social workers know more
about an applicant's financial status or employment status than they choose to mention. Even if SS & H are in the same directorate it does not
always make for an easy relationship.
A long explanation I know and perhaps it will open an even longer debate!
Edwina Withe
Data Protection Officer - Legal Services
Bracknell Forest BC
>>> Moira Forbes <[log in to unmask]> 09/17/01 03:09pm >>>
Sorry this is so long but I would be interested in any views regarding
extracts from a protocol document from a housing provider covering DPA and
sharing information between departments and third parties:-
1. "it is important to note that there is no legal obstruction to full
disclosure of any information held by either department to the other since
this information is ultimately the 'property' of the Council as a whole, as
a single discrete body."
2. "As a general principle there should be some form of client/tenant
consent to information being shared. There will however be circumstances
where client/tenant consent either cannot be gained or should not be sought
but where information sharing is necessary eg. where there is a perceived
significant risk in terms of client/tenant safety, where there are concerns
regarding the safety of a household member, the general public or staff
members and where the client/tenant could lose their tenancy through
eviction procedures. Under these circumstances, clearly there is a
requirement for both departments to share information regardless of the
client/tenants consent to do so.
e.g. Arrears Case - Prevention of Eviction where children/other vulnerable
persons are put out of the household
Housing should disclose all aspects of the case to Social Work eg. previous
arrangements broken; current arrears; declared income and benefits etc."
{Surely being "vulnerable" does not remove your rights under DPA or any
Act?}
"Initial Receipt of Information
i. Where it is clearly likely that information will be shared with another
department members of staff should seek the client/tenant or third parties
consent at the outset.
ii. Where appropriate the donor of the information should be given an
undertaking on confidentiality and be advised that in certain circumstances
information will be shared regardless of consent.
In some cases it will be sufficient to share information orally, in others
it will be more appropriate to provide information in writing."
{No mention is given in the procedure to recording the "oral" statement}
"Staff Safety
Where a client/tenant known to both departments has committed an act of
violence toward a member of staff of either department Operational Managers
should as a matter of course and as soon as possible alert their
counterpart (Area Manager/Neighbourhood Manager) about the incident giving
basic client/tenant details so that steps can be taken to maximise the
safety of staff from the other department who may come into contact with
the individual.
The above should be regarded as a circumstance where client/tenant consent
is not required."
{While technially agreeing, should the D.S. not still be advised of the
decision and reasons why thereby also allowing them to present their own
case and request a review of the decision? and again no mention of record
keeping in the guidelines.}
M. Forbes
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
If you wish to leave this list please send the command
leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
All user commands can be found at : -
www.jiscmail.ac.uk/user-manual/summary-user-commands.htm
all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please!
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This e-mail may be read by employees of the Council and is therefore not to be considered private by the recipient. The views expressed in this e-mail are those of the individual and not necessarily the views or opinions of Bracknell Forest Borough Council.
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the system manager. Email: [log in to unmask]
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail has been swept by MailSweeper for the presence of computer viruses. Although the Council has taken steps to ensure that this e-mail and any attachments are virus free we advise that in keeping with good ICT practice the recipients should confirm this for themselves.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
If you wish to leave this list please send the command
leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
All user commands can be found at : -
www.jiscmail.ac.uk/user-manual/summary-user-commands.htm
all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please!
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|