On Wed, 30 May 2001, Dave Wyatt wrote:
> b) Find the data subject on the tape distinct from any other data subject on
> the same tape. - I would expect a photograph of the DS would be reasonable
> to enable this task to be attempted.
This technology is moving fast. You can also recognise individuals with
reasonable certainty by gait, so could do so if they had paper bags on
their heads. But that certainly is in the distroportionate bounds...
> c) Remove any personal data (the image?) of all other data subjects in the
> vincinity of the requesting data subject so as not to invalidate their
> rights. - Technical issue which can allow a disproportionate effort argument
> (but no guarantees it would stand scrutiny if a court debated)
Again, I ask what is the cost of this, in reality? Has anyone done it
for a reasonable length of footage? What exactly do you mask out? To
remove any doubt of giving away information could you (should you?) fuzz
out everything but the data subject? What do they have the right to see
beyond their own image?
> To be more certain in the UK we need UK case law, does anyone know of any
> yet?
Good question :-)
Tim
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
If you wish to leave this list please send the command
leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
All user commands can be found at : -
www.jiscmail.ac.uk/user-manual/summary-user-commands.htm
all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please!
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|