JISCMail - DATA-PROTECTION Archives

Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Subscriber's Corner

Email Lists

DATA-PROTECTION Archives

February 2015

View:

Show Author | Hide Author

		LISTSERV Archives
		DATA-PROTECTION Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Get Password

Subject	From	Date	Size
Re: FW: Hawktalk: ECJ Ryneš ruling implies IP addresses are personal data in themselves	Michael Bacon - Grimbaldus	Sun, 1 Feb 2015 09:23:17 +0000	134 lines
Re: FW: Hawktalk: ECJ Ryneš ruling implies IP addresses are personal data in themselves	Roland Perry	Sun, 1 Feb 2015 10:50:37 +0000	150 lines
Re: FW: Hawktalk: ECJ Ryneš ruling implies IP addresses are personal data in themselves	Roland Perry	Sun, 1 Feb 2015 11:09:41 +0000	63 lines
Re: FW: Hawktalk: ECJ Ryneš ruling implies IP addresses are personal data in themselves	Michael Bacon - Grimbaldus	Sun, 1 Feb 2015 12:40:09 +0000	104 lines
Re: FW: Hawktalk: ECJ Ryneš ruling implies IP addresses are personal data in themselves	Roland Perry	Sun, 1 Feb 2015 13:45:56 +0000	138 lines
Re: FW: Hawktalk: ECJ Ryneš ruling implies IP addresses are personal data in themselves	Tim Turner	Sun, 1 Feb 2015 14:25:23 +0000	317 lines
Re: FW: Hawktalk: ECJ Ryneš ruling implies IP addresses are personal data in themselves	Roland Perry	Sun, 1 Feb 2015 15:14:56 +0000	37 lines
Re: FW: Hawktalk: ECJ Ryneš ruling implies IP addresses are personal data in themselves	Roland Perry	Sun, 1 Feb 2015 15:18:24 +0000	42 lines
Re: FW: Hawktalk: ECJ Ryneš ruling implies IP addresses are personal data in themselves	Tim Turner	Sun, 1 Feb 2015 15:28:46 +0000	171 lines
Re: FW: Hawktalk: ECJ Ryneš ruling implies IP addresses are personal data in themselves	Michael Bacon - Grimbaldus	Sun, 1 Feb 2015 15:51:53 +0000	269 lines
Re: FW: Hawktalk: ECJ Ryneš ruling implies IP addresses are personal data in themselves	Phil Bradshaw	Sun, 1 Feb 2015 16:01:43 +0000	37 lines
Re: FW: Hawktalk: ECJ Ryneš ruling implies IP addresses are personal data in themselves	Tim Turner	Sun, 1 Feb 2015 16:07:39 +0000	405 lines
Re: FW: Hawktalk: ECJ Ryneš ruling implies IP addresses are personal data in themselves	Roland Perry	Mon, 2 Feb 2015 08:47:12 +0000	68 lines
Data Protection in Brunei	Ibrahim Hasan	Mon, 2 Feb 2015 09:34:42 +0000	41 lines
Data Protection Qualifications	Ibrahim Hasan	Mon, 2 Feb 2015 09:44:10 +0000	162 lines
Re: Data Protection Qualifications	Lisa Souza - PDP	Mon, 2 Feb 2015 09:57:33 -0000	103 lines
Post script on my blog: Hawktalk: ECJ Ryneš ruling implies IP addresses are personal data in themselves	Chris Pounder	Mon, 2 Feb 2015 10:18:38 -0000	51 lines
Re: Post script on my blog: Hawktalk: ECJ Ryneš ruling implies IP addresses are personal data in themselves	Lawrence Serewicz	Mon, 2 Feb 2015 10:41:14 +0000	101 lines
Re: Post script on my blog: Hawktalk: ECJ Ryneš ruling implies IP addresses are personal data in themselves	Roland Perry	Mon, 2 Feb 2015 11:51:08 +0000	45 lines
Re: Post script on my blog: Hawktalk: ECJ Ryneš ruling implies IP addresses are personal data in themselves	Andrew Cormack	Mon, 2 Feb 2015 14:13:08 +0000	98 lines
Police Photos	Ibrahim Hasan	Tue, 3 Feb 2015 11:05:30 +0000	93 lines
Re: Police Photos	Chris Pounder	Tue, 3 Feb 2015 11:20:51 -0000	463 lines
Data Protection Qualification	Stu Ashton	Tue, 3 Feb 2015 13:26:44 +0000	36 lines
Job Opportunity in London	Tim Turner	Wed, 4 Feb 2015 09:53:25 +0000	127 lines
Press Gazette investigations vexatious	Chris Tinsley	Wed, 4 Feb 2015 13:49:02 +0000	81 lines
Re: Press Gazette investigations vexatious	Peter Dinsdale	Wed, 4 Feb 2015 13:56:27 +0000	402 lines
Re: Press Gazette investigations vexatious	Owen Thomas	Wed, 4 Feb 2015 17:00:17 +0000	29 lines
Re: Press Gazette investigations vexatious	Baines, Jonathan	Wed, 4 Feb 2015 17:03:55 +0000	488 lines
FW: Hawktalk: Is this the solution for maintaining privacy in the Cloud?	Chris Pounder	Thu, 5 Feb 2015 11:31:45 -0000	214 lines
Re: FW: Hawktalk: Is this the solution for maintaining privacy in the Cloud?	Michael Bacon - Grimbaldus	Thu, 5 Feb 2015 12:47:42 +0000	274 lines
ICO given powers to audit the NHS	Simon Howarth	Thu, 5 Feb 2015 13:44:40 -0000	372 lines
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS	Baines, Jonathan	Thu, 5 Feb 2015 13:52:47 +0000	471 lines
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS	Tim Turner	Thu, 5 Feb 2015 13:59:42 +0000	569 lines
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS	Chris Pounder	Thu, 5 Feb 2015 14:11:35 -0000	920 lines
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS	Gudge, Teresa	Thu, 5 Feb 2015 14:20:50 +0000	389 lines
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS	Tim Turner	Thu, 5 Feb 2015 14:32:01 +0000	743 lines
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS	Lawrence Serewicz	Thu, 5 Feb 2015 15:09:26 +0000	558 lines
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS	Baines, Jonathan	Thu, 5 Feb 2015 15:26:19 +0000	678 lines
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS	Gemma Galdon Clavell	Thu, 5 Feb 2015 17:05:03 +0100	838 lines
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS	Lawrence Serewicz	Thu, 5 Feb 2015 16:10:44 +0000	178 lines
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS	Baines, Jonathan	Thu, 5 Feb 2015 16:11:48 +0000	384 lines
I like that phone APP.....	Chris Pounder	Thu, 5 Feb 2015 16:12:01 -0000	218 lines
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS	Lawrence Serewicz	Thu, 5 Feb 2015 16:13:59 +0000	720 lines
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS	Gemma Galdon Clavell	Thu, 5 Feb 2015 17:16:58 +0100	429 lines
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS	Baines, Jonathan	Thu, 5 Feb 2015 16:17:24 +0000	360 lines
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS	Tim Turner	Thu, 5 Feb 2015 16:20:54 +0000	920 lines
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS	Lawrence Serewicz	Thu, 5 Feb 2015 16:27:02 +0000	466 lines
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS	Baines, Jonathan	Thu, 5 Feb 2015 16:31:04 +0000	536 lines
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS	Lawrence Serewicz	Thu, 5 Feb 2015 16:47:37 +0000	185 lines
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS	Tim Turner	Thu, 5 Feb 2015 16:56:49 +0000	242 lines
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS [The FSA can also fine the private sector but not the public]	Lawrence Serewicz	Thu, 5 Feb 2015 17:52:07 +0000	535 lines
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS [The FSA can also fine the private sector but not the public]	Tim Turner	Thu, 5 Feb 2015 18:18:20 +0000	722 lines
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS	Paul Cardin	Thu, 5 Feb 2015 21:49:53 -0000	742 lines
Friday viewing: if your APP was a shop assistant...	Chris Pounder	Fri, 6 Feb 2015 10:36:48 -0000	187 lines
GCHQ surevillance unlawful	Chris Pounder	Fri, 6 Feb 2015 11:04:20 -0000	252 lines
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS [The FSA can also fine the private sector but not the public]	Lawrence Serewicz	Fri, 6 Feb 2015 12:39:38 +0000	199 lines
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS [The FSA can also fine the private sector but not the public]	Michael Bacon - Grimbaldus	Fri, 6 Feb 2015 13:00:32 +0000	320 lines
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS [The FSA can also fine the private sector but not the public]	Tim Turner	Fri, 6 Feb 2015 13:01:53 +0000	238 lines
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS [The FSA can also fine the private sector but not the public]	Michael Bacon - Grimbaldus	Fri, 6 Feb 2015 13:09:53 +0000	131 lines
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS [The FSA can also fine the private sector but not the public]	Cotterill, Steve	Fri, 6 Feb 2015 13:40:36 +0000	427 lines
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS [The FSA can also fine the private sector but not the public]	Donald Henderson - CHX	Fri, 6 Feb 2015 13:50:49 +0000	688 lines
s35 DPA	Phil Bradshaw	Fri, 6 Feb 2015 14:32:51 +0000	36 lines
Re: s35 DPA	Lawrence Serewicz	Fri, 6 Feb 2015 15:09:57 +0000	85 lines
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS [The FSA can also fine the private sector but not the public]	Lawrence Serewicz	Fri, 6 Feb 2015 15:23:53 +0000	385 lines
Re: s35 DPA	Phil Bradshaw	Fri, 6 Feb 2015 15:58:54 +0000	31 lines
The future of data protection soon to go the way of lawyers?	Lawrence Serewicz	Fri, 6 Feb 2015 18:16:24 +0000	191 lines
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS	Simon Howarth	Sat, 7 Feb 2015 20:25:57 -0000	320 lines
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS	Simon Howarth	Sat, 7 Feb 2015 20:34:45 -0000	851 lines
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS	Simon Howarth	Sat, 7 Feb 2015 20:39:44 -0000	504 lines
Proposed EU DP Regulation	Ibrahim Hasan	Mon, 9 Feb 2015 09:55:05 +0000	38 lines
Hawktalk: Materials that help you to laugh, learn and chill	Chris Pounder	Tue, 10 Feb 2015 10:00:59 -0000	166 lines
really a Friday aftenoon topic but still...	Lynsey Newton	Tue, 10 Feb 2015 10:42:21 +0000	195 lines
Re: really a Friday aftenoon topic but still...	Baines, Jonathan	Tue, 10 Feb 2015 10:48:39 +0000	493 lines
Data protection for Charities	Ibrahim Hasan	Wed, 11 Feb 2015 08:02:51 +0000	98 lines
Re: Data protection for Charities	Chris Pounder	Wed, 11 Feb 2015 09:41:11 -0000	383 lines
Alzheimer's Society information sharing guide	Baines, Jonathan	Wed, 11 Feb 2015 11:00:23 +0000	305 lines
ICO audits, context, and regional data protection security workshops	Lawrence Serewicz	Wed, 11 Feb 2015 13:36:08 +0000	317 lines
Re: ICO audits, context, and regional data protection security workshops	Baines, Jonathan	Fri, 13 Feb 2015 10:13:35 +0000	598 lines
Sharing Information with social landlords re Universal Credit	Kate Glanville	Fri, 13 Feb 2015 11:32:11 +0000	37 lines
Cambridge conference on Google Spain	Baines, Jonathan	Tue, 17 Feb 2015 14:07:51 +0000	316 lines
Re: Cambridge conference on Google Spain	Baines, Jonathan	Tue, 17 Feb 2015 15:20:42 +0000	379 lines
Data Protection Regulation likely to provide a lower level protection than Directive 95/46/EC	Chris Pounder	Wed, 18 Feb 2015 11:24:28 -0000	293 lines
s55 "obtaining"	Baines, Jonathan	Thu, 19 Feb 2015 12:58:55 +0000	362 lines
Re: s55 "obtaining"	Lawrence Serewicz	Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:15:35 +0000	598 lines
Re: s55 "obtaining"	Phil Bradshaw	Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:22:08 +0000	33 lines
Re: s55 "obtaining"	Baines, Jonathan	Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:23:20 +0000	790 lines
Re: s55 "obtaining"	Andrew Goodfellow-Swaap	Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:24:58 +0000	41 lines
Re: s55 "obtaining"	Phil Bradshaw	Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:29:58 +0000	35 lines
Re: s55 "obtaining"	Michael Bacon - Grimbaldus	Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:30:19 +0000	447 lines
Re: s55 "obtaining"	Michael Bacon - Grimbaldus	Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:32:26 +0000	65 lines
Re: s55 "obtaining"	Lawrence Serewicz	Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:35:02 +0000	650 lines
Re: s55 "obtaining"	Lawrence Serewicz	Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:43:47 +0000	93 lines
Re: s55 "obtaining"	SHQ - Gardiner, Lee	Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:44:22 +0000	547 lines
Re: s55 "obtaining"	Andrew Goodfellow-Swaap	Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:44:29 +0000	35 lines
Re: s55 "obtaining"	Phil Bradshaw	Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:50:47 +0000	40 lines
Re: s55 "obtaining"	Lawrence Serewicz	Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:52:28 +0000	513 lines
Re: s55 "obtaining"	Michael Bacon - Grimbaldus	Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:54:51 +0000	65 lines
Re: s55 "obtaining"	SHQ - Gardiner, Lee	Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:55:24 +0000	704 lines
Re: s55 "obtaining"	Baines, Jonathan	Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:55:29 +0000	454 lines
Re: s55 "obtaining"	Lawrence Serewicz	Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:58:45 +0000	99 lines
Re: s55 "obtaining"	Lawrence Serewicz	Thu, 19 Feb 2015 14:00:11 +0000	114 lines
Re: s55 "obtaining"	Catherine Lantsbery	Fri, 20 Feb 2015 10:16:33 +0000	55 lines
Re: Preparing for new DPA law?	Catherine Lantsbery	Fri, 20 Feb 2015 10:46:04 +0000	48 lines
Re: s55 "obtaining"	Baines, Jonathan	Fri, 20 Feb 2015 11:16:49 +0000	124 lines
Re: Preparing for new DPA law?	Baines, Jonathan	Fri, 20 Feb 2015 11:18:59 +0000	117 lines
FW: privacy impact assessment templates	GRAHAM Susan	Fri, 20 Feb 2015 13:20:13 +0000	65 lines
Re: s55 "obtaining"	Paul Ticher	Fri, 20 Feb 2015 14:10:29 -0000	480 lines
Re: s55 "obtaining"	Baines, Jonathan	Fri, 20 Feb 2015 14:20:24 +0000	483 lines
Re: Preparing for new DPA law?	Chris Pounder	Fri, 20 Feb 2015 15:07:30 -0000	80 lines
Job Opportunity	Karen Mc Cullagh (LAW)	Fri, 20 Feb 2015 23:11:48 +0000	128 lines
Re: privacy impact assessment templates	Cotterill, Steve	Mon, 23 Feb 2015 09:03:54 +0000	120 lines
Nominations open: IRMS Fellowships and 2015 IRMS Profession Awards	IRMS Chair	Tue, 24 Feb 2015 08:17:48 +0000	410 lines
Anticipatory regulation?	Baines, Jonathan	Tue, 24 Feb 2015 12:03:03 +0000	84 lines
s35 Access to Restricted Information	Heness Nigel (CENTRAL AND NORTH WEST LONDON NHS FOUNDATION TRUST)	Wed, 25 Feb 2015 08:23:52 +0000	82 lines
Re: s35 Access to Restricted Information	Catherine Hanley	Wed, 25 Feb 2015 09:24:23 +0000	193 lines
Re: s35 Access to Restricted Information	Peter Dinsdale	Wed, 25 Feb 2015 09:39:01 +0000	203 lines
Re: s35 Access to Restricted Information	Catherine Hanley	Wed, 25 Feb 2015 09:49:43 +0000	332 lines
Re: s35 Access to Restricted Information	Phil Bradshaw	Wed, 25 Feb 2015 11:13:51 +0000	38 lines
If personal data is not property, who owns it and how do you have a right to it?	Lawrence Serewicz	Wed, 25 Feb 2015 13:00:27 +0000	298 lines
Re: If personal data is not property, who owns it and how do you have a right to it?	Phil Bradshaw	Wed, 25 Feb 2015 13:28:08 +0000	47 lines
How to retrieve personal data disclosed to someone in error?	Lawrence Serewicz	Wed, 25 Feb 2015 13:57:37 +0000	51 lines
Re: How to retrieve personal data disclosed to someone in error?	Phil Bradshaw	Wed, 25 Feb 2015 14:47:14 +0000	48 lines
Re: How to retrieve personal data disclosed to someone in error?	Phil Bradshaw	Wed, 25 Feb 2015 14:52:23 +0000	30 lines
Re: How to retrieve personal data disclosed to someone in error?	Lawrence Serewicz	Wed, 25 Feb 2015 15:12:14 +0000	89 lines
Re: FW: privacy impact assessment templates	Simon Howarth	Wed, 25 Feb 2015 15:27:39 -0000	95 lines
Re: FW: privacy impact assessment templates	Emmanuelle Goldson-Croix	Wed, 25 Feb 2015 15:34:17 +0000	133 lines
FW: privacy impact assessment templates	Roshier, Brenda	Fri, 27 Feb 2015 16:48:02 +0000	184 lines

DATA-PROTECTION Archives

February 2015

Options

Subject

From

Date

Size

JiscMail Tools

RSS Feeds and Sharing

Search Archives

Archives