|
|
|
Size
|
Re: FW: Hawktalk: ECJ Ryneš ruling implies IP addresses are personal data in themselves
|
Michael Bacon - Grimbaldus |
Sun, 1 Feb 2015 09:23:17 +0000 |
134 lines |
Re: FW: Hawktalk: ECJ Ryneš ruling implies IP addresses are personal data in themselves
|
Roland Perry |
Sun, 1 Feb 2015 10:50:37 +0000 |
150 lines |
Re: FW: Hawktalk: ECJ Ryneš ruling implies IP addresses are personal data in themselves
|
Roland Perry |
Sun, 1 Feb 2015 11:09:41 +0000 |
63 lines |
Re: FW: Hawktalk: ECJ Ryneš ruling implies IP addresses are personal data in themselves
|
Michael Bacon - Grimbaldus |
Sun, 1 Feb 2015 12:40:09 +0000 |
104 lines |
Re: FW: Hawktalk: ECJ Ryneš ruling implies IP addresses are personal data in themselves
|
Roland Perry |
Sun, 1 Feb 2015 13:45:56 +0000 |
138 lines |
Re: FW: Hawktalk: ECJ Ryneš ruling implies IP addresses are personal data in themselves
|
Tim Turner |
Sun, 1 Feb 2015 14:25:23 +0000 |
317 lines |
Re: FW: Hawktalk: ECJ Ryneš ruling implies IP addresses are personal data in themselves
|
Roland Perry |
Sun, 1 Feb 2015 15:14:56 +0000 |
37 lines |
Re: FW: Hawktalk: ECJ Ryneš ruling implies IP addresses are personal data in themselves
|
Roland Perry |
Sun, 1 Feb 2015 15:18:24 +0000 |
42 lines |
Re: FW: Hawktalk: ECJ Ryneš ruling implies IP addresses are personal data in themselves
|
Tim Turner |
Sun, 1 Feb 2015 15:28:46 +0000 |
171 lines |
Re: FW: Hawktalk: ECJ Ryneš ruling implies IP addresses are personal data in themselves
|
Michael Bacon - Grimbaldus |
Sun, 1 Feb 2015 15:51:53 +0000 |
269 lines |
Re: FW: Hawktalk: ECJ Ryneš ruling implies IP addresses are personal data in themselves
|
Phil Bradshaw |
Sun, 1 Feb 2015 16:01:43 +0000 |
37 lines |
Re: FW: Hawktalk: ECJ Ryneš ruling implies IP addresses are personal data in themselves
|
Tim Turner |
Sun, 1 Feb 2015 16:07:39 +0000 |
405 lines |
Re: FW: Hawktalk: ECJ Ryneš ruling implies IP addresses are personal data in themselves
|
Roland Perry |
Mon, 2 Feb 2015 08:47:12 +0000 |
68 lines |
Data Protection in Brunei
|
Ibrahim Hasan |
Mon, 2 Feb 2015 09:34:42 +0000 |
41 lines |
Data Protection Qualifications
|
Ibrahim Hasan |
Mon, 2 Feb 2015 09:44:10 +0000 |
162 lines |
Re: Data Protection Qualifications
|
Lisa Souza - PDP |
Mon, 2 Feb 2015 09:57:33 -0000 |
103 lines |
Post script on my blog: Hawktalk: ECJ Ryneš ruling implies IP addresses are personal data in themselves
|
Chris Pounder |
Mon, 2 Feb 2015 10:18:38 -0000 |
51 lines |
Re: Post script on my blog: Hawktalk: ECJ Ryneš ruling implies IP addresses are personal data in themselves
|
Lawrence Serewicz |
Mon, 2 Feb 2015 10:41:14 +0000 |
101 lines |
Re: Post script on my blog: Hawktalk: ECJ Ryneš ruling implies IP addresses are personal data in themselves
|
Roland Perry |
Mon, 2 Feb 2015 11:51:08 +0000 |
45 lines |
Re: Post script on my blog: Hawktalk: ECJ Ryneš ruling implies IP addresses are personal data in themselves
|
Andrew Cormack |
Mon, 2 Feb 2015 14:13:08 +0000 |
98 lines |
Police Photos
|
Ibrahim Hasan |
Tue, 3 Feb 2015 11:05:30 +0000 |
93 lines |
Re: Police Photos
|
Chris Pounder |
Tue, 3 Feb 2015 11:20:51 -0000 |
463 lines |
Data Protection Qualification
|
Stu Ashton |
Tue, 3 Feb 2015 13:26:44 +0000 |
36 lines |
Job Opportunity in London
|
Tim Turner |
Wed, 4 Feb 2015 09:53:25 +0000 |
127 lines |
Press Gazette investigations vexatious
|
Chris Tinsley |
Wed, 4 Feb 2015 13:49:02 +0000 |
81 lines |
Re: Press Gazette investigations vexatious
|
Peter Dinsdale |
Wed, 4 Feb 2015 13:56:27 +0000 |
402 lines |
Re: Press Gazette investigations vexatious
|
Owen Thomas |
Wed, 4 Feb 2015 17:00:17 +0000 |
29 lines |
Re: Press Gazette investigations vexatious
|
Baines, Jonathan |
Wed, 4 Feb 2015 17:03:55 +0000 |
488 lines |
FW: Hawktalk: Is this the solution for maintaining privacy in the Cloud?
|
Chris Pounder |
Thu, 5 Feb 2015 11:31:45 -0000 |
214 lines |
Re: FW: Hawktalk: Is this the solution for maintaining privacy in the Cloud?
|
Michael Bacon - Grimbaldus |
Thu, 5 Feb 2015 12:47:42 +0000 |
274 lines |
ICO given powers to audit the NHS
|
Simon Howarth |
Thu, 5 Feb 2015 13:44:40 -0000 |
372 lines |
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS
|
Baines, Jonathan |
Thu, 5 Feb 2015 13:52:47 +0000 |
471 lines |
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS
|
Tim Turner |
Thu, 5 Feb 2015 13:59:42 +0000 |
569 lines |
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS
|
Chris Pounder |
Thu, 5 Feb 2015 14:11:35 -0000 |
920 lines |
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS
|
Gudge, Teresa |
Thu, 5 Feb 2015 14:20:50 +0000 |
389 lines |
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS
|
Tim Turner |
Thu, 5 Feb 2015 14:32:01 +0000 |
743 lines |
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS
|
Lawrence Serewicz |
Thu, 5 Feb 2015 15:09:26 +0000 |
558 lines |
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS
|
Baines, Jonathan |
Thu, 5 Feb 2015 15:26:19 +0000 |
678 lines |
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS
|
Gemma Galdon Clavell |
Thu, 5 Feb 2015 17:05:03 +0100 |
838 lines |
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS
|
Lawrence Serewicz |
Thu, 5 Feb 2015 16:10:44 +0000 |
178 lines |
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS
|
Baines, Jonathan |
Thu, 5 Feb 2015 16:11:48 +0000 |
384 lines |
I like that phone APP.....
|
Chris Pounder |
Thu, 5 Feb 2015 16:12:01 -0000 |
218 lines |
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS
|
Lawrence Serewicz |
Thu, 5 Feb 2015 16:13:59 +0000 |
720 lines |
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS
|
Gemma Galdon Clavell |
Thu, 5 Feb 2015 17:16:58 +0100 |
429 lines |
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS
|
Baines, Jonathan |
Thu, 5 Feb 2015 16:17:24 +0000 |
360 lines |
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS
|
Tim Turner |
Thu, 5 Feb 2015 16:20:54 +0000 |
920 lines |
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS
|
Lawrence Serewicz |
Thu, 5 Feb 2015 16:27:02 +0000 |
466 lines |
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS
|
Baines, Jonathan |
Thu, 5 Feb 2015 16:31:04 +0000 |
536 lines |
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS
|
Lawrence Serewicz |
Thu, 5 Feb 2015 16:47:37 +0000 |
185 lines |
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS
|
Tim Turner |
Thu, 5 Feb 2015 16:56:49 +0000 |
242 lines |
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS [The FSA can also fine the private sector but not the public]
|
Lawrence Serewicz |
Thu, 5 Feb 2015 17:52:07 +0000 |
535 lines |
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS [The FSA can also fine the private sector but not the public]
|
Tim Turner |
Thu, 5 Feb 2015 18:18:20 +0000 |
722 lines |
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS
|
Paul Cardin |
Thu, 5 Feb 2015 21:49:53 -0000 |
742 lines |
Friday viewing: if your APP was a shop assistant...
|
Chris Pounder |
Fri, 6 Feb 2015 10:36:48 -0000 |
187 lines |
GCHQ surevillance unlawful
|
Chris Pounder |
Fri, 6 Feb 2015 11:04:20 -0000 |
252 lines |
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS [The FSA can also fine the private sector but not the public]
|
Lawrence Serewicz |
Fri, 6 Feb 2015 12:39:38 +0000 |
199 lines |
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS [The FSA can also fine the private sector but not the public]
|
Michael Bacon - Grimbaldus |
Fri, 6 Feb 2015 13:00:32 +0000 |
320 lines |
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS [The FSA can also fine the private sector but not the public]
|
Tim Turner |
Fri, 6 Feb 2015 13:01:53 +0000 |
238 lines |
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS [The FSA can also fine the private sector but not the public]
|
Michael Bacon - Grimbaldus |
Fri, 6 Feb 2015 13:09:53 +0000 |
131 lines |
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS [The FSA can also fine the private sector but not the public]
|
Cotterill, Steve |
Fri, 6 Feb 2015 13:40:36 +0000 |
427 lines |
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS [The FSA can also fine the private sector but not the public]
|
Donald Henderson - CHX |
Fri, 6 Feb 2015 13:50:49 +0000 |
688 lines |
s35 DPA
|
Phil Bradshaw |
Fri, 6 Feb 2015 14:32:51 +0000 |
36 lines |
Re: s35 DPA
|
Lawrence Serewicz |
Fri, 6 Feb 2015 15:09:57 +0000 |
85 lines |
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS [The FSA can also fine the private sector but not the public]
|
Lawrence Serewicz |
Fri, 6 Feb 2015 15:23:53 +0000 |
385 lines |
Re: s35 DPA
|
Phil Bradshaw |
Fri, 6 Feb 2015 15:58:54 +0000 |
31 lines |
The future of data protection soon to go the way of lawyers?
|
Lawrence Serewicz |
Fri, 6 Feb 2015 18:16:24 +0000 |
191 lines |
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS
|
Simon Howarth |
Sat, 7 Feb 2015 20:25:57 -0000 |
320 lines |
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS
|
Simon Howarth |
Sat, 7 Feb 2015 20:34:45 -0000 |
851 lines |
Re: ICO given powers to audit the NHS
|
Simon Howarth |
Sat, 7 Feb 2015 20:39:44 -0000 |
504 lines |
Proposed EU DP Regulation
|
Ibrahim Hasan |
Mon, 9 Feb 2015 09:55:05 +0000 |
38 lines |
Hawktalk: Materials that help you to laugh, learn and chill
|
Chris Pounder |
Tue, 10 Feb 2015 10:00:59 -0000 |
166 lines |
really a Friday aftenoon topic but still...
|
Lynsey Newton |
Tue, 10 Feb 2015 10:42:21 +0000 |
195 lines |
Re: really a Friday aftenoon topic but still...
|
Baines, Jonathan |
Tue, 10 Feb 2015 10:48:39 +0000 |
493 lines |
Data protection for Charities
|
Ibrahim Hasan |
Wed, 11 Feb 2015 08:02:51 +0000 |
98 lines |
Re: Data protection for Charities
|
Chris Pounder |
Wed, 11 Feb 2015 09:41:11 -0000 |
383 lines |
Alzheimer's Society information sharing guide
|
Baines, Jonathan |
Wed, 11 Feb 2015 11:00:23 +0000 |
305 lines |
ICO audits, context, and regional data protection security workshops
|
Lawrence Serewicz |
Wed, 11 Feb 2015 13:36:08 +0000 |
317 lines |
Re: ICO audits, context, and regional data protection security workshops
|
Baines, Jonathan |
Fri, 13 Feb 2015 10:13:35 +0000 |
598 lines |
Sharing Information with social landlords re Universal Credit
|
Kate Glanville |
Fri, 13 Feb 2015 11:32:11 +0000 |
37 lines |
Cambridge conference on Google Spain
|
Baines, Jonathan |
Tue, 17 Feb 2015 14:07:51 +0000 |
316 lines |
Re: Cambridge conference on Google Spain
|
Baines, Jonathan |
Tue, 17 Feb 2015 15:20:42 +0000 |
379 lines |
Data Protection Regulation likely to provide a lower level protection than Directive 95/46/EC
|
Chris Pounder |
Wed, 18 Feb 2015 11:24:28 -0000 |
293 lines |
s55 "obtaining"
|
Baines, Jonathan |
Thu, 19 Feb 2015 12:58:55 +0000 |
362 lines |
Re: s55 "obtaining"
|
Lawrence Serewicz |
Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:15:35 +0000 |
598 lines |
Re: s55 "obtaining"
|
Phil Bradshaw |
Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:22:08 +0000 |
33 lines |
Re: s55 "obtaining"
|
Baines, Jonathan |
Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:23:20 +0000 |
790 lines |
Re: s55 "obtaining"
|
Andrew Goodfellow-Swaap |
Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:24:58 +0000 |
41 lines |
Re: s55 "obtaining"
|
Phil Bradshaw |
Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:29:58 +0000 |
35 lines |
Re: s55 "obtaining"
|
Michael Bacon - Grimbaldus |
Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:30:19 +0000 |
447 lines |
Re: s55 "obtaining"
|
Michael Bacon - Grimbaldus |
Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:32:26 +0000 |
65 lines |
Re: s55 "obtaining"
|
Lawrence Serewicz |
Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:35:02 +0000 |
650 lines |
Re: s55 "obtaining"
|
Lawrence Serewicz |
Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:43:47 +0000 |
93 lines |
Re: s55 "obtaining"
|
SHQ - Gardiner, Lee |
Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:44:22 +0000 |
547 lines |
Re: s55 "obtaining"
|
Andrew Goodfellow-Swaap |
Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:44:29 +0000 |
35 lines |
Re: s55 "obtaining"
|
Phil Bradshaw |
Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:50:47 +0000 |
40 lines |
Re: s55 "obtaining"
|
Lawrence Serewicz |
Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:52:28 +0000 |
513 lines |
Re: s55 "obtaining"
|
Michael Bacon - Grimbaldus |
Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:54:51 +0000 |
65 lines |
Re: s55 "obtaining"
|
SHQ - Gardiner, Lee |
Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:55:24 +0000 |
704 lines |
Re: s55 "obtaining"
|
Baines, Jonathan |
Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:55:29 +0000 |
454 lines |
Re: s55 "obtaining"
|
Lawrence Serewicz |
Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:58:45 +0000 |
99 lines |
Re: s55 "obtaining"
|
Lawrence Serewicz |
Thu, 19 Feb 2015 14:00:11 +0000 |
114 lines |
Re: s55 "obtaining"
|
Catherine Lantsbery |
Fri, 20 Feb 2015 10:16:33 +0000 |
55 lines |
Re: Preparing for new DPA law?
|
Catherine Lantsbery |
Fri, 20 Feb 2015 10:46:04 +0000 |
48 lines |
Re: s55 "obtaining"
|
Baines, Jonathan |
Fri, 20 Feb 2015 11:16:49 +0000 |
124 lines |
Re: Preparing for new DPA law?
|
Baines, Jonathan |
Fri, 20 Feb 2015 11:18:59 +0000 |
117 lines |
FW: privacy impact assessment templates
|
GRAHAM Susan |
Fri, 20 Feb 2015 13:20:13 +0000 |
65 lines |
Re: s55 "obtaining"
|
Paul Ticher |
Fri, 20 Feb 2015 14:10:29 -0000 |
480 lines |
Re: s55 "obtaining"
|
Baines, Jonathan |
Fri, 20 Feb 2015 14:20:24 +0000 |
483 lines |
Re: Preparing for new DPA law?
|
Chris Pounder |
Fri, 20 Feb 2015 15:07:30 -0000 |
80 lines |
Job Opportunity
|
Karen Mc Cullagh (LAW) |
Fri, 20 Feb 2015 23:11:48 +0000 |
128 lines |
Re: privacy impact assessment templates
|
Cotterill, Steve |
Mon, 23 Feb 2015 09:03:54 +0000 |
120 lines |
Nominations open: IRMS Fellowships and 2015 IRMS Profession Awards
|
IRMS Chair |
Tue, 24 Feb 2015 08:17:48 +0000 |
410 lines |
Anticipatory regulation?
|
Baines, Jonathan |
Tue, 24 Feb 2015 12:03:03 +0000 |
84 lines |
s35 Access to Restricted Information
|
Heness Nigel (CENTRAL AND NORTH WEST LONDON NHS FOUNDATION TRUST) |
Wed, 25 Feb 2015 08:23:52 +0000 |
82 lines |
Re: s35 Access to Restricted Information
|
Catherine Hanley |
Wed, 25 Feb 2015 09:24:23 +0000 |
193 lines |
Re: s35 Access to Restricted Information
|
Peter Dinsdale |
Wed, 25 Feb 2015 09:39:01 +0000 |
203 lines |
Re: s35 Access to Restricted Information
|
Catherine Hanley |
Wed, 25 Feb 2015 09:49:43 +0000 |
332 lines |
Re: s35 Access to Restricted Information
|
Phil Bradshaw |
Wed, 25 Feb 2015 11:13:51 +0000 |
38 lines |
If personal data is not property, who owns it and how do you have a right to it?
|
Lawrence Serewicz |
Wed, 25 Feb 2015 13:00:27 +0000 |
298 lines |
Re: If personal data is not property, who owns it and how do you have a right to it?
|
Phil Bradshaw |
Wed, 25 Feb 2015 13:28:08 +0000 |
47 lines |
How to retrieve personal data disclosed to someone in error?
|
Lawrence Serewicz |
Wed, 25 Feb 2015 13:57:37 +0000 |
51 lines |
Re: How to retrieve personal data disclosed to someone in error?
|
Phil Bradshaw |
Wed, 25 Feb 2015 14:47:14 +0000 |
48 lines |
Re: How to retrieve personal data disclosed to someone in error?
|
Phil Bradshaw |
Wed, 25 Feb 2015 14:52:23 +0000 |
30 lines |
Re: How to retrieve personal data disclosed to someone in error?
|
Lawrence Serewicz |
Wed, 25 Feb 2015 15:12:14 +0000 |
89 lines |
Re: FW: privacy impact assessment templates
|
Simon Howarth |
Wed, 25 Feb 2015 15:27:39 -0000 |
95 lines |
Re: FW: privacy impact assessment templates
|
Emmanuelle Goldson-Croix |
Wed, 25 Feb 2015 15:34:17 +0000 |
133 lines |
FW: privacy impact assessment templates
|
Roshier, Brenda |
Fri, 27 Feb 2015 16:48:02 +0000 |
184 lines |