JISCMail - DATA-PROTECTION Archives

Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Subscriber's Corner

Email Lists

DATA-PROTECTION Archives

March 2011

View:

Show Author | Hide Author

		LISTSERV Archives
		DATA-PROTECTION Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Get Password

Subject	Date	Size
Royston ANPR	Thu, 31 Mar 2011 22:51:04 +0100	34 lines
DPA and debt chasing your views on fairness	Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:32:09 +0100	329 lines
Re: Email Policy Query	Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:21:11 +0100	81 lines
Re: Personal Images on work > computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?) [Long post]	Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:14:32 +0100	134 lines
Right to be forgotten	Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:13:00 +0100	49 lines
Re: Personal Images on work > computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?) [Long post]	Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:07:27 +0100	144 lines
ETICA newsletter second edition March	Thu, 31 Mar 2011 16:24:24 +0100	36 lines
Re: Email Policy Query	Thu, 31 Mar 2011 14:47:22 +0100	148 lines
Re: Email Policy Query	Thu, 31 Mar 2011 13:54:14 +0100	49 lines
Re: Email Policy Query	Thu, 31 Mar 2011 12:32:29 +0100	197 lines
Re: Email Policy Query	Thu, 31 Mar 2011 12:26:29 +0100	118 lines
Email Policy Query	Thu, 31 Mar 2011 12:19:28 +0100	55 lines
Re: Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?) [Long post]	Wed, 30 Mar 2011 18:40:38 +0100	73 lines
Re: Personal Images on work computers shorter post	Wed, 30 Mar 2011 17:57:32 +0100	584 lines
Re: Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?) [Long post]	Wed, 30 Mar 2011 12:30:00 -0400	240 lines
Personal Images on work computers shorter post	Wed, 30 Mar 2011 16:34:55 +0100	279 lines
Surveillance and CCTV	Wed, 30 Mar 2011 16:13:15 +0100	94 lines
Re: Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?) [Long post]	Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:47:29 +0100	610 lines
More breaches	Wed, 30 Mar 2011 14:52:31 +0100	149 lines
Re: Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?) [Long post]	Wed, 30 Mar 2011 12:36:29 +0100	434 lines
Re: Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?) [Long post]	Wed, 30 Mar 2011 12:02:22 +0100	238 lines
Re: Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?) [Long post]	Wed, 30 Mar 2011 10:16:53 +0100	773 lines
Re: Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?) [Long post]	Wed, 30 Mar 2011 09:46:30 +0100	402 lines
Re: Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?)	Wed, 30 Mar 2011 08:48:26 +0100	470 lines
Re: Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?)	Tue, 29 Mar 2011 13:49:24 -0400	165 lines
Re: Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?)	Tue, 29 Mar 2011 16:26:17 +0100	236 lines
Re: Does Police charging an individual (holding inappropriate images) provide sufficient right for an employer to investigate their electronic accounts and desk space?	Tue, 29 Mar 2011 14:23:21 +0100	122 lines
Re: Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?)	Tue, 29 Mar 2011 14:20:16 +0100	144 lines
Re: Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?)	Tue, 29 Mar 2011 08:32:14 -0400	215 lines
Re: Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?)	Tue, 29 Mar 2011 13:19:02 +0100	484 lines
Personal Images on work computers (Does this contravene more than the DPA?)	Tue, 29 Mar 2011 13:12:33 +0100	397 lines
Re: Does Police charging an individual (holding inappropriate images) provide sufficient right for an employer to investigate their electronic accounts and desk space?	Tue, 29 Mar 2011 09:54:13 +0000	102 lines
Fw: [data-protection] Does Police charging an individual (holding inappropriate images) provide sufficient right for an employer to investigate their electronic accounts and desk space?	Tue, 29 Mar 2011 11:49:56 +0200	317 lines
Re: Does Police charging an individual (holding inappropriate images) provide sufficient right for an employer to investigate their electronic accounts and desk space?	Tue, 29 Mar 2011 10:28:54 +0100	94 lines
Does Police charging an individual (holding inappropriate images) provide sufficient right for an employer to investigate their electronic accounts and desk space?	Tue, 29 Mar 2011 08:46:54 +0100	60 lines
Re: is this legal?	Mon, 28 Mar 2011 18:54:48 +0100	297 lines
FW: Cpd25: Data Protection For Library Staff [Event Ref. No. TG2/DP]	Mon, 28 Mar 2011 06:39:42 -0700	197 lines
Compromise agreements, bonus payments etc.	Mon, 28 Mar 2011 12:44:46 +0100	93 lines
Re: is this legal?	Mon, 28 Mar 2011 12:10:55 +0100	131 lines
FW: Hawktalk: time to forget about a "right to forget"	Mon, 28 Mar 2011 11:56:23 +0100	287 lines
FW: Cpd25: Data Protection For Library Staff [Event Ref. No. TG2/DP]	Mon, 28 Mar 2011 01:27:48 -0700	151 lines
Re: is this legal?	Sat, 26 Mar 2011 20:46:05 -0000	463 lines
is this legal?	Sat, 26 Mar 2011 18:01:31 +0000	137 lines
PC security of foster carers	Fri, 25 Mar 2011 13:21:26 +0000	54 lines
Data sharing for multi-agency customer journey mapping	Fri, 25 Mar 2011 13:03:35 +0000	87 lines
Re: Staff rights v Student rights	Wed, 23 Mar 2011 17:08:45 -0000	170 lines
Re: Staff rights v Student rights	Wed, 23 Mar 2011 15:45:43 +0000	472 lines
Staff rights v Student rights	Wed, 23 Mar 2011 15:17:47 -0000	218 lines
Re: Schools and the Student Support Centre	Wed, 23 Mar 2011 09:14:16 +0000	94 lines
Re: Schools and the Student Support Centre	Tue, 22 Mar 2011 17:44:57 -0000	71 lines
Re: Schools and the Student Support Centre	Tue, 22 Mar 2011 16:05:28 +0000	30 lines
Re: Trying to locate a decision	Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:57:04 +0000	29 lines
Data Protection Manager Opportunity (London) - Maternity Cover	Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:21:52 -0000	616 lines
Moving On	Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:18:51 -0000	340 lines
Re: Trying to locate a decision	Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:12:13 +0000	79 lines
Trying to locate a decision	Mon, 21 Mar 2011 10:57:50 +0000	37 lines
Hawktalk: The confidentiality of personal data in the Census 2011 is not guaranteed	Sat, 19 Mar 2011 13:21:11 -0000	227 lines
NPM: RE: Friday Question - Expired Processing Agreement	Fri, 18 Mar 2011 13:43:47 +0000	90 lines
Friday Question - Expired Processing Agreement	Fri, 18 Mar 2011 13:03:40 +0000	45 lines
Re: Debt Collection Agencies	Fri, 18 Mar 2011 10:21:11 +0000	244 lines
Re: Debt Collection Agencies	Fri, 18 Mar 2011 09:59:35 -0000	175 lines
Re: Don't Get IT	Thu, 17 Mar 2011 17:22:10 +0000	461 lines
Re: Don't Get IT	Thu, 17 Mar 2011 11:21:25 -0400	445 lines
Housing Benefit Files	Thu, 17 Mar 2011 13:50:01 -0000	63 lines
Debt Collection Agencies	Thu, 17 Mar 2011 13:31:38 -0000	448 lines
Re: Lollicam	Thu, 17 Mar 2011 12:59:04 -0000	249 lines
Re: Don't Get IT	Thu, 17 Mar 2011 12:40:29 +0000	414 lines
Choice of exemptions	Thu, 17 Mar 2011 11:06:00 +0000	50 lines
Re: Lollicam	Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:25:18 -0000	181 lines
Re: Lollicam	Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:17:21 +0000	235 lines
Re: Lollicam	Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:12:27 -0000	174 lines
Re: Lollicam	Thu, 17 Mar 2011 09:59:22 -0000	101 lines
Lollicam	Thu, 17 Mar 2011 09:55:35 +0000	30 lines
Retention: Adult Alleged Abuser Records	Thu, 17 Mar 2011 09:03:00 +0000	219 lines
Re: Don't Get IT	Thu, 17 Mar 2011 08:53:03 +0000	65 lines
Re: Don't Get IT	Wed, 16 Mar 2011 19:37:24 +0000	405 lines
Re: Don't Get IT	Wed, 16 Mar 2011 12:54:40 -0400	358 lines
Re: Don't Get IT	Wed, 16 Mar 2011 16:37:26 -0000	278 lines
New Group on Linked In	Wed, 16 Mar 2011 16:22:28 +0000	109 lines
Re: Sorry to inflict this on you: ISEB Data Protection Exam Results	Wed, 16 Mar 2011 16:19:45 -0000	348 lines
Re: Don't Get IT	Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:35:43 -0000	572 lines
Re: Sorry to inflict this on you: ISEB Data Protection Exam Results	Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:21:02 -0000	348 lines
Re: Sorry to inflict this on you: ISEB Data Protection Exam Results	Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:14:42 -0000	296 lines
Re: Sorry to inflict this on you: ISEB Data Protection Exam Results	Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:13:06 -0000	703 lines
Re: Don't Get IT	Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:10:51 -0000	238 lines
Performance - Who Scored Best?	Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:04:24 +0000	98 lines
Re: Don't Get IT	Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:01:25 -0000	333 lines
Don't Get IT	Wed, 16 Mar 2011 13:57:25 +0000	106 lines
Sorry to inflict this on you: ISEB Data Protection Exam Results	Wed, 16 Mar 2011 13:02:18 -0000	449 lines
ISEB Data Protection Exam Results	Wed, 16 Mar 2011 11:41:55 +0000	149 lines
Name & Shame ?	Wed, 16 Mar 2011 11:34:51 +0000	30 lines
Information Rights Conference	Wed, 16 Mar 2011 09:01:08 +0000	45 lines
Cartoon to celebrate the Internet	Wed, 16 Mar 2011 00:55:05 -0000	221 lines
council docs in a skip	Tue, 15 Mar 2011 18:29:36 +0000	40 lines
Re: CLI	Tue, 15 Mar 2011 16:16:16 -0000	163 lines
Re: CLI	Tue, 15 Mar 2011 16:04:35 -0000	132 lines
Re: CLI	Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:58:48 -0000	157 lines
Re: CLI	Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:15:20 -0000	77 lines
Re: CLI	Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:59:52 -0000	273 lines
Re: CLI	Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:59:50 -0000	200 lines
Re: CLI	Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:55:46 -0000	160 lines
Re: CLI	Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:42:33 -0000	66 lines
CLI	Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:23:08 +0000	44 lines
Re: Hand-written notes	Mon, 14 Mar 2011 16:28:50 -0000	613 lines
Re: Hand-written notes	Mon, 14 Mar 2011 16:22:15 +0000	327 lines
Re: Hand-written notes	Mon, 14 Mar 2011 15:12:54 +0000	131 lines
Re: Hand-written notes	Mon, 14 Mar 2011 14:50:02 +0000	72 lines
Hand-written notes	Mon, 14 Mar 2011 14:47:19 +0000	38 lines
Re: Civil Parking Enforcement	Mon, 14 Mar 2011 08:38:14 -0000	93 lines
Civil Parking Enforcement	Sat, 12 Mar 2011 22:28:59 +0000	34 lines
Re: Freedom Fighting	Fri, 11 Mar 2011 16:45:41 -0000	499 lines
Re: Freedom Fighting	Fri, 11 Mar 2011 15:13:11 +0000	175 lines
Re: Passing on company details for cold calling purposes	Fri, 11 Mar 2011 15:04:23 +0000	452 lines
Freedom Fighting	Fri, 11 Mar 2011 14:36:33 -0000	37 lines
Freedom Fighting	Fri, 11 Mar 2011 13:40:44 +0000	44 lines
Re: FW: [data-protection] Cookies	Fri, 11 Mar 2011 12:13:01 +0000	42 lines
Re: Passing on company details for cold calling purposes	Fri, 11 Mar 2011 09:46:32 +0000	393 lines
Re: [UNCLASSIFIED] Passing on company details for cold calling purposes	Fri, 11 Mar 2011 09:36:43 +0000	497 lines
Re: Cookies	Fri, 11 Mar 2011 03:33:31 -0500	522 lines
FW: [data-protection] Cookies	Fri, 11 Mar 2011 07:01:35 -0000	737 lines
Re: Passing on company details for cold calling purposes	Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:55:56 -0000	586 lines
Re: Passing on company details for cold calling purposes	Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:50:35 -0000	612 lines
Passing on company details for cold calling purposes	Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:43:07 +0000	337 lines
Re: Use of Image - Children/Adult	Thu, 10 Mar 2011 14:16:06 -0000	931 lines
revision to PECR changes	Thu, 10 Mar 2011 14:14:24 -0000	367 lines
Re: Cookies	Thu, 10 Mar 2011 09:08:26 -0500	655 lines
Re: Cookies	Thu, 10 Mar 2011 13:57:36 -0000	358 lines
Cookies	Thu, 10 Mar 2011 13:43:17 +0000	118 lines
Re: Use of Image - Children/Adult	Thu, 10 Mar 2011 11:40:26 +0000	539 lines
Re: Use of Image - Children/Adult	Thu, 10 Mar 2011 11:16:00 +0000	607 lines
Re: Use of Image - Children/Adult	Thu, 10 Mar 2011 11:13:55 +0000	642 lines
Re: Use of Image - Children/Adult	Thu, 10 Mar 2011 11:09:01 -0000	410 lines
Re: Use of Image - Children/Adult	Thu, 10 Mar 2011 11:08:31 -0000	433 lines
Use of Image - Children/Adult	Thu, 10 Mar 2011 10:47:17 -0000	184 lines
Local authority surveillance - the new law	Thu, 10 Mar 2011 08:43:46 +0000	46 lines
Working Paper on the Regulation of Privacy published	Wed, 9 Mar 2011 20:17:23 +0100	53 lines
Re: PVP list to ONS	Wed, 9 Mar 2011 16:44:45 -0000	661 lines
Re: CCTV	Wed, 9 Mar 2011 16:19:36 +0000	442 lines
Re: PVP list to ONS	Wed, 9 Mar 2011 16:10:26 +0000	420 lines
Re: PVP list to ONS	Wed, 9 Mar 2011 16:01:06 -0000	446 lines
Re: PVP list to ONS	Wed, 9 Mar 2011 15:55:49 -0000	383 lines
PVP list to ONS	Wed, 9 Mar 2011 15:52:49 -0000	190 lines
Re: CCTV	Wed, 9 Mar 2011 15:51:27 -0000	393 lines
Re: CCTV	Wed, 9 Mar 2011 08:28:34 +0000	488 lines
Re: CCTV	Wed, 9 Mar 2011 08:10:05 -0000	396 lines
Privacy in Public	Tue, 8 Mar 2011 11:04:30 +0000	44 lines
Re: CCTV	Tue, 8 Mar 2011 10:57:55 +0000	372 lines
Re: CCTV	Tue, 8 Mar 2011 10:44:47 -0000	302 lines
Re: CCTV	Tue, 8 Mar 2011 10:24:55 -0000	211 lines
RIPSA Forms Guidance Manual	Mon, 7 Mar 2011 11:31:09 +0000	41 lines
Free web seminar this morning	Mon, 7 Mar 2011 08:57:24 +0000	48 lines
Hawktalk: RIPA changes in Freedoms Bill: negligible improvement in privacy protection	Mon, 7 Mar 2011 00:17:31 -0000	200 lines
Re: SAR from a debtor	Fri, 4 Mar 2011 16:58:56 +0000	441 lines
SAR from a debtor	Fri, 4 Mar 2011 16:52:28 -0000	209 lines
Re: CCTV	Fri, 4 Mar 2011 13:52:23 -0000	79 lines
Re: CCTV	Fri, 4 Mar 2011 13:49:18 -0000	258 lines
Re: CCTV	Fri, 4 Mar 2011 13:42:20 +0000	236 lines
Re: CCTV	Fri, 4 Mar 2011 13:34:35 -0000	237 lines
Re: CCTV	Fri, 4 Mar 2011 13:24:55 +0000	157 lines
Re: CCTV	Fri, 4 Mar 2011 13:23:14 -0000	204 lines
Re: CCTV	Fri, 4 Mar 2011 13:09:17 -0000	104 lines
Re: CCTV	Fri, 4 Mar 2011 13:03:48 -0000	330 lines
Re: CCTV	Fri, 4 Mar 2011 13:00:41 +0000	254 lines
Re: CCTV	Fri, 4 Mar 2011 12:52:12 +0000	214 lines
Re: CCTV	Fri, 4 Mar 2011 12:10:47 -0000	123 lines
Re: CCTV	Fri, 4 Mar 2011 12:08:44 +0000	169 lines
Re: CCTV	Fri, 4 Mar 2011 12:05:21 -0000	163 lines
Re: CCTV	Fri, 4 Mar 2011 12:01:47 +0000	77 lines
CCTV	Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:56:42 +0000	34 lines
Today's Information Law Daily	Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:48:13 +0000	43 lines
For those interested in Facebook settings	Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:12:28 -0000	29 lines
Informatics 2011 (Rome, Italy) - 1st call extension: until 28 March 2011	Thu, 3 Mar 2011 17:03:47 +0000	169 lines
DM 2011 (Rome, Italy) - 1st call extension: until 28 March 2011	Thu, 3 Mar 2011 17:02:29 +0000	135 lines
Sharing Information from PVP Lists	Thu, 3 Mar 2011 13:55:12 +0000	44 lines
Enquiry about speaking at CPD25 course - 31/3/2011	Thu, 3 Mar 2011 08:25:27 +0000	60 lines
ICO evidence identifies data protection concerns over Freedoms Bill	Thu, 3 Mar 2011 01:38:50 -0000	230 lines
free web seminars	Wed, 2 Mar 2011 13:55:07 +0000	49 lines
New CCTV Code	Wed, 2 Mar 2011 09:56:34 +0000	102 lines
Re: CCTV: s.29 or PACE?	Tue, 1 Mar 2011 15:01:26 -0000	196 lines
CCTV: s.29 or PACE?	Tue, 1 Mar 2011 14:48:51 +0000	114 lines
Re: [UNCLASSIFIED] [data-protection] CCTV: s.29 or PACE?	Tue, 1 Mar 2011 12:47:24 -0000	212 lines
Re: [UNCLASSIFIED] [data-protection] CCTV: s.29 or PACE?	Tue, 1 Mar 2011 12:47:23 +0000	196 lines
Re: [UNCLASSIFIED] [data-protection] CCTV: s.29 or PACE?	Tue, 1 Mar 2011 12:34:44 +0000	131 lines
CCTV: s.29 or PACE?	Tue, 1 Mar 2011 12:24:05 +0000	61 lines
Re: Credit Card Fraud	Tue, 1 Mar 2011 12:15:36 +0000	58 lines
Re: Credit Card Fraud	Tue, 1 Mar 2011 09:44:21 -0000	190 lines
Re: Credit Card Fraud	Tue, 1 Mar 2011 09:42:15 +0000	158 lines
Re: Credit Card Fraud	Tue, 1 Mar 2011 07:56:20 +0000	114 lines
Re: Credit Card Fraud	Tue, 1 Mar 2011 07:48:30 -0000	95 lines
Credit Card Fraud	Tue, 1 Mar 2011 07:41:22 +0000	41 lines

DATA-PROTECTION Archives

March 2011

Options

Subject

Date

Size

JiscMail Tools

RSS Feeds and Sharing

Search Archives

Archives