JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN Archives

PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN  July 2007

PHD-DESIGN July 2007

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Colonialism -- a Carefully Delimited Response -- Reply to MSC Nelson

From:

Norm Sheehan <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Norm Sheehan <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sun, 29 Jul 2007 12:12:33 +1000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (238 lines)

Thanks Danny ...you are correct concerning the stream of research within
which I work for critical views of anthropology ... and my response to
Mead does come from a conversation with a visiting Samoan academic who told
stories from her family concerning the games that cheeky teenagers
played (as they do) with this very serious and seemingly obsessed
interloper. Much in the same way as Australian kids will sometimes warn
tourists to be wary of the drop-bear a larger and more dangerous
relative of the Koala that tends to randomly fall out of trees onto
people.

The issue under investigation in this critique is not the validity of
anthropology, science or design but the different roles that such
practices occupy at their culture centre and at various margins at
different times. Mead's work so central and scientific at publication to
inform the academy about remote practices ... is now valuable in
revealing the pseudo-scientific origins of cultural anthropology when
operating from such a centre. Also for Indigenous scholars these flaws
in academic practice index to the often seen complicity of such science
in past and contemporary projects of domination at these margins.

One of the leveling games that I play with my students is to present
Aboriginal stories collected by anthropologists (many eminent pre 1978).
These stories reveal the narratives of resistance embedded in the ways
that these active and intelligent agents responded to an anthropological
inquiry - one that presented their thematically flexible narrative streams as
static primitive artifacts ... mere reproductions for recording and
preservation.

Much modern anthropology has learnt from these fallacies ... but some
still build on these themes to present denegrations of Indigenous cultures 
see Diamond's work on ecocide and the reply by 


Peiser, B. (2005) From Ecocide to Genocide the Rape of Rapa Nui. 

In Energy and Environment Vol 16 No: 3&4 pp. 513-539



Michael Jackson's (the anthropologist) work is exceptional particularly
in relation to place and space & I find Gell's Art anthropology one of
the most illuminating works where the agency of images is explored ...
they cause us to talk about them... and the prospect introduced (new for
western understandings but integral to Indigenous) -that design
constitutes externalized cognition.


Norm


Jackson, Michael 2005 Existential anthropology : events, exigencies, and
effects. New York : Berghahn Books,.

Gell, Alfred 1998.Art and agency : an anthropological theory Oxford ;
New York : Clarendon.


________________________________

From: PhD-Design - This list is for discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design on behalf of Ken Friedman
Sent: Sat 28/07/2007 7:47 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Colonialism -- a Carefully Delimited Response -- Reply to MSC Nelson



Dear MSC,

Thanks for your thoughtful and challenging reply. Your careful
response deserves a quick answer. I'll try a short comment, and then
I plan to leave this issue behind to focus on the main thread
stemming from Dori's original note and the rich conversation that
followed, most recently with the dialogue between M P Ranjan and
Thomas Rasmussen. (I've still be thinking through some issues dating
back to G K van Patter's comments and I hope to marshal my thoughts
well enough to post them by next week.)

Without agreeing with your position on the issue of colonialism, I am
aware of the position you outline. This is the post-colonial
position, as distinct from any specific post-colonial theory. If you
take the position that "[c]olonialism [w]as a driving force in the
focus of 19th and 20th century scholarly activity and practice" and
that "academia was/is corrupted and driven by colonial impulses,"
then anthropology must surely suffer from the same illness that
affects the other arts and sciences, and their allied professions. In
this view, psychoanalysis, geography, history, philosophy, political
science, sociology and all the rest are corrupted. For some, this
even extends to physics, mathematics, and chemistry. If this view is
correct, anthropology cannot be exempt.

I understand the logic of the view. I simply disagree.

In my view, this this line of discourse seems to be the product of
two great driving forces. One is the genuine soul-searching and
disciplinary or interdisciplinary inquiry that we are going through
as the world of scholarship and academia struggles to find its way
into the new millennium while dealing honestly with the problems of
the past. The other force is academic fashion -- just as many
scholars sought to be existential at one moment, post-modern at
another, the current fashion involves the earnest (and often honest)
drive to be post-colonial. This seems to be especially painful for
North American scholars and American-born scholars around the world
who see the force and power of the United States controlled by the
neo-conservative authors of "Project for the New American Century."
In this context, one would naturally be wary of colonialism and
imperialism.

Where it comes to the arts and sciences, I am not as sure that the
forces driving the Bush-Cheney regime have corrupted and driven all
academic fields in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. This is no
more an absolute fact than the idea that the religious or royal
foundation of earlier universities necessarily corrupted and drove
the scholarship of those who studied or taught in universities before
the Humboldt reforms of 1805.

As I wrote, the malign drives and practices of some scholars and
individuals does not necessarily corrupt the entire field. The fact
that the founder of psychoanalysis was born in the Austro-Hungarian
Empire does not mean that psychoanalysis is itself imperialist and
colonial.

Nevertheless, the genuine challenge of the kinds of scholarly
initiatives in places like Wisconsin -- and elsewhere -- mean that I
may well be wrong. I have not followed the post-colonial debate
closely enough to study all the claims and counter-claims.

My earlier argument was based on a charge brought against
anthropology without any mention of other fields. I would argue that
anthropology alone cannot be guilty of the charge of colonialism --
after all, no anthropologist ever ran any of the great empires or
colonial powers. If I were to accept your premise, I would accept
your logical conclusion: If all academic fields are corrupted by
colonialism, then anthropology must be corrupt.

I want to posit a slightly different view.

I was born into a world in which the great colonial empires still
held sway. India had gained independence, but it was not yet a
republic. The same was true of Pakistan. Many African nations were
still controlled by the colonial powers, the Apartheid laws of 1948
were passed in South Africa the year before I was born, the Soviet
Union dominated the unwilling nations of Eastern Europe,
UN-sanctioned protectorates and governance arrangements covered many
nations that are now independent of their former governors,
Indonesian independence from the Netherlands had just been recognized
by international law, Malaysia and Singapore were still part of the
British Empire,  Algeria was as a French colony and the First
Indo-China War was still in progress. The independent nations of this
world were also shaped in great part by former colonial powers --
Iraq and Yugoslavia, for example, drawn on a map after World War I,
Saudi Arabia declared and recognized, Syria gaining freedom from
France. Geopolitical and economic colonialism enabled nations without
formal colonies (such as the United States) to control other nations
in different ways.

In this world, it seemed to many of us that scholarship and the
advancement of free inquiry was an antidote to colonialism and
imperialism. Whatever the personal politics or behavior of scholars,
scientists, and artists, the slow push for knowledge and wisdom
seemed to work some good in the world.

It may well be that we were all so thoroughly embedded in the world
shaped by colonialism and imperialism that we were corrupted without
knowing it, but I do not believe this to be so. I felt (and feel)
myself to be part of a long line of human beings from many places and
cultures struggling to move forward from a known past into an unknown
future, making improvements along the way.

One thing is clear. I am not saying, "we all have biases, just live
with it." This thread and the contributions from Norm, Danny, David,
Dori, and others are significant. I disagree respectfully with some
of the thoughts, and I've tried to state a reasonable basis for my
disagreement.

It seems to me that in design, as in other disciplines and fields, we
do "spend a lot of time looking at their own fields and thinking
critically about the assumptions" that shape the disciplines and
fields of design.

It is impossible to flat-out reject the post-colonial position that
all fields are corrupt because they emerge from and are embedded in a
civilization that produced the great colonial empires. This may be
what Gandhi meant when a reporter asked him what he thought of
Western civilization and he answered, "I think it would be a good
idea!"

Starting with a challenge to one myth about a single anthropologist,
this sub-thread has shifted to Danny's reasoned critique of
anthropology as a field embroiled in colonialism and then to your
challenge to all academic fields as necessarily embroiled in
colonialism. While I'd have to disagree with a specific critique
against anthropology as singularly colonial, I can't disagree with
the general critique in the same way. I can only say that so far, I
am not convinced that this is the case. If it is, then it is also the
case for anthropology. Despite my view that neither case is so, I
accept that a larger debate is in progress around the world. Since we
will not settle it here, I am going to conclude my part in this
sub-thread for now.

Thanks for your nicely articulated thoughts -- and thanks, again, to
Norm, David, Danny, and Dori.

Warm wishes,

Ken



MSC Nelson wrote:

--snip--

While it is clear that your intention is to protect the virtue of
anthropology as a field, I believe that, at least on the University
of Wisconsin campus, it would be a simple task to find many scholars
spread
across disciplines that strongly disagree with you.  Colonialism as a
driving force in the focus of 19th and 20th century scholarly
activity and practice is a major research area in the humanities
here, and cuts across traditional disciplinary lines.  In this
environment, the idea that academia was/is corrupted and driven by
colonial impulses is accepted as a given, and the focus is more on
trying to figure out what this means for us as scholars.

--snip--

...Many researchers would agree that anthropology was and is shaped
by colonialism and often finds itself as a tool for gaining power;
this applies even when anthropologists are not actively engaged in
creating colonial tools. However, rather than seeing this as a
negative it could be seen an opportunity to learn something. Perhaps
design research could use a bit more of this self-critique from
within, because others outside of the field are already doing so,
sometimes without the insights into the finer points of what it means
to design.

--snip--

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager