JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN Archives

PHD-DESIGN Archives


February 2017


View:

Show Author | Hide Author

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject

From

Date Sorted by Date, Most Recent First

Size

knowledge production in the design field?

Elin Olander

Tue, 28 Feb 2017 14:13:39 +0000

57 lines

INTERSECTIONS: Collaborations in Textile Design Research - CALL deadline extended to 10 March 2017

Janette Matthews

Tue, 28 Feb 2017 12:52:34 +0000

116 lines

2 x PhD studentship in design/HCI for Internet of Things

Nick Taylor

Tue, 28 Feb 2017 11:24:22 +0000

56 lines

Re: When a bias is not a bias, when a weakness is actually a strength

Stephen Matthew Wisniew

Mon, 27 Feb 2017 15:31:38 -0500

89 lines

Iterations Issue 5: Call for Articles

Muireann.McMahon

Mon, 27 Feb 2017 16:24:42 +0000

176 lines

United Kingdom Design Research Funding Landscape Survey

Rodgers, Paul

Mon, 27 Feb 2017 16:19:42 +0000

64 lines

I Sold My Undergraduate Thesis to a Print Content Farm -- article on Lambert Academic Publishing in Slate

Ken Friedman

Mon, 27 Feb 2017 14:31:09 +0100

380 lines

Lambert Academic Publishing and Verlag Dr. Mueller: Beware!

Ken Friedman

Mon, 27 Feb 2017 14:30:24 +0100

326 lines

Turning your PhD Thesis into a Book

Ken Friedman

Mon, 27 Feb 2017 14:07:30 +0100

204 lines

CFP: Engineering Healthcare Technologies for Broadening the Participation of Patients and Carers - WS at EICS’17

Francisco Nunes

Mon, 27 Feb 2017 09:49:36 +0000

97 lines

Re: When a bias is not a bias, when a weakness is actually a strength

G. Mauricio Mejía

Sun, 26 Feb 2017 22:11:36 -0500

132 lines

When a bias is not a bias, when a weakness is actually a strength

Don Norman

Sun, 26 Feb 2017 17:37:56 -0800

107 lines

Re: Why asking designers isn't useful in design research and other problems

Filippo Salustri

Sun, 26 Feb 2017 19:18:16 -0500

112 lines

Re: Where should you publish your book?

Don Norman

Sun, 26 Feb 2017 12:10:27 -0800

102 lines

Re: An Interesting Course from two University of Washington Professors

Gunnar Swanson

Sun, 26 Feb 2017 08:45:51 -0500

57 lines

Where should you publish your book?

Ken Friedman

Sun, 26 Feb 2017 10:30:02 +0100

261 lines

Re: An Interesting Course from two University of Washington Professors

Alma Hoffmann

Sat, 25 Feb 2017 20:19:41 -0600

143 lines

Re: An Interesting Course from two University of Washington Professors

Alma Hoffmann

Sat, 25 Feb 2017 20:15:48 -0600

113 lines

Re: An Interesting Course from two University of Washington Professors

Alma Hoffmann

Sat, 25 Feb 2017 20:14:27 -0600

79 lines

Re: Why asking designers isn't useful in design research -- a better link for a paper

Filippo Salustri

Fri, 24 Feb 2017 11:45:40 -0500

41 lines

Re: Ban using 'p' in design research statistics?

Filippo Salustri

Fri, 24 Feb 2017 11:18:11 -0500

119 lines

Re: Ban using 'p' in design research statistics?

Gunnar Swanson

Fri, 24 Feb 2017 09:13:42 -0500

46 lines

Re: Ban using 'p' in design research statistics?

Ryan Hum

Fri, 24 Feb 2017 14:04:56 +0000

92 lines

Re: Ban using 'p' in design research statistics?

Bernardo Doré

Fri, 24 Feb 2017 10:27:23 -0300

80 lines

Ban using 'p' in design research statistics?

Terence Love

Fri, 24 Feb 2017 19:26:17 +0800

62 lines

Re: An Interesting Course from two University of Washington Professors

João Ferreira

Fri, 24 Feb 2017 11:23:13 +0000

41 lines

Re: Why asking designers isn't useful in design research -- a better link for a paper

Kari Kuutti

Fri, 24 Feb 2017 08:59:19 +0000

43 lines

Re: Epistemological Differences -- Research in an Academic Discipline vs. Research in a Professional Practice

Terence Love

Fri, 24 Feb 2017 09:25:54 +0800

255 lines

Help with research questions

Alma Hoffmann

Thu, 23 Feb 2017 16:54:44 -0600

72 lines

Re: How then can we change our minds?

Keith Russell

Thu, 23 Feb 2017 22:45:09 +0000

91 lines

Re: Why asking designers isn't useful in design research and other problems

Kari Kuutti

Thu, 23 Feb 2017 22:09:49 +0000

90 lines

Re: Encouraging Cultural Variation in Design

Susan Hagan

Thu, 23 Feb 2017 18:11:20 +0000

75 lines

PhD student 'Prototyping Residential Subdivisions'

Liesbeth HUYBRECHTS

Thu, 23 Feb 2017 17:27:38 +0100

105 lines

Food for thought

Bob Este

Thu, 23 Feb 2017 09:12:50 -0700

29 lines

4S 2017 CfP: STS, Critical Design, and the Critical Digital Humanities

Malazita, James Wilson

Thu, 23 Feb 2017 15:29:08 +0000

62 lines

CfP - International Transdisciplinarity Conference 2017: Transdisciplinary Research and Education

Daniela Peukert

Thu, 23 Feb 2017 16:17:39 +0100

81 lines

Re: Encouraging Cultural Variation in Design

Nigan Bayazit

Thu, 23 Feb 2017 17:49:32 +0300

90 lines

Re: An Interesting Course from two University of Washington Professors

Gabriele Ferri

Thu, 23 Feb 2017 15:44:27 +0100

73 lines

Re: An Interesting Course from two University of Washington Professors

GMAIL

Thu, 23 Feb 2017 14:25:50 +0000

62 lines

An Interesting Course from two University of Washington Professors

Ali Ilhan

Thu, 23 Feb 2017 17:07:41 +0300

37 lines

Re: How then can we change our minds?

Ken Friedman

Thu, 23 Feb 2017 10:48:12 +0100

82 lines

Re: Why asking designers isn't useful in design research and other problems

Francois Nsenga

Thu, 23 Feb 2017 10:18:51 +0300

73 lines

Re: How then can we change our minds?

Johann van der Merwe

Thu, 23 Feb 2017 07:37:03 +0200

117 lines

Re: How then can we change our minds?

Keith Russell

Thu, 23 Feb 2017 05:36:04 +0000

44 lines

Re: How then can we change our minds?

Johann van der Merwe

Thu, 23 Feb 2017 07:33:23 +0200

93 lines

Re: How then can we change our minds?

David Sless

Thu, 23 Feb 2017 15:44:48 +1100

44 lines

Re: How then can we change our minds?

Keith Russell

Thu, 23 Feb 2017 04:36:20 +0000

70 lines

Re: How then can we change our minds?

Gunnar Swanson

Wed, 22 Feb 2017 23:32:41 -0500

48 lines

How then can we change our minds?

Keith Russell

Thu, 23 Feb 2017 04:22:34 +0000

63 lines

Re: Why asking designers isn't useful in design research and other problems

Katherine J Hepworth

Wed, 22 Feb 2017 18:16:31 +0000

64 lines

Re: Why asking designers isn't useful in design research and other problems

jean schneider

Wed, 22 Feb 2017 16:48:32 +0100

81 lines

Make work work! By Design or By Disaster Conference 2017 | March 10th and 11th, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Bozen (Italy)

alvise

Wed, 22 Feb 2017 15:14:48 +0100

105 lines

Re: Why asking designers isn't useful in design research and other problems

Jha Santosh Kumar

Wed, 22 Feb 2017 19:17:51 +0530

51 lines

Re: Why asking designers isn't useful in design research and other problems

Eduardo A. Corte-Real

Wed, 22 Feb 2017 13:42:05 +0000

29 lines

RTD 2017 - final call for registrations

John Vines

Wed, 22 Feb 2017 10:08:27 +0000

94 lines

[Summer school UBISS 2017] First Call for Participants to workshop "DIGITAL PRODUCT REALIZATION: MAKING THINGS THAT MATTER" (application deadline March 13, 2017)

Georgi Georgiev

Wed, 22 Feb 2017 08:07:38 +0000

187 lines

Re: Why asking designers isn't useful in design research and other problems

Francois Nsenga

Wed, 22 Feb 2017 10:44:16 +0300

47 lines

Re: Why asking designers isn't useful in design research and other problems

Ali Ilhan

Wed, 22 Feb 2017 09:49:46 +0300

72 lines

Re: Why asking designers isn't useful in design research and other problems

Francois Nsenga

Wed, 22 Feb 2017 09:36:10 +0300

51 lines

Why asking designers isn't useful in design research and other problems

Terence Love

Wed, 22 Feb 2017 12:41:03 +0800

57 lines

Re: The hard question on Design + Personal Data

Keith Russell

Wed, 22 Feb 2017 00:03:18 +0000

82 lines

Re: The hard question on Design + Personal Data

Can Uckan

Tue, 21 Feb 2017 13:11:14 +0300

150 lines

Re: Encouraging Cultural Variation in Design

Susan Hagan

Tue, 21 Feb 2017 10:00:50 +0000

94 lines

The hard question on Design + Personal Data

Alessandro Carelli

Tue, 21 Feb 2017 09:55:38 +0000

105 lines

Fwd: Job: Lecturer, Department of Industrial Design, University of Johannesburg, South Africa

Angus Donald Campbell

Tue, 21 Feb 2017 11:45:35 +0200

66 lines

Re: Encouraging Cultural Variation in Design

Abdullah Al-Tuwaijri

Tue, 21 Feb 2017 12:20:07 +0300

90 lines

Encouraging Cultural Variation in Design

Susan Hagan

Tue, 21 Feb 2017 08:05:04 +0000

47 lines

Re: Reactions are sometimes good

Keith Russell

Mon, 20 Feb 2017 22:51:57 +0000

55 lines

Re: Being and Design

jean schneider

Mon, 20 Feb 2017 22:38:07 +0100

90 lines

Re: Reactions are sometimes good

Fernando Rojas

Mon, 20 Feb 2017 16:48:52 -0400

78 lines

Two 3 years fully funded research positions

Diaz-Kommonen Lily

Mon, 20 Feb 2017 20:11:25 +0000

81 lines

RSD5 Symposium Proceedings

Peter Jones | OCADU

Mon, 20 Feb 2017 12:46:38 -0500

89 lines

Call for Student Volunteers for EICS 2017

Francisco Nunes

Mon, 20 Feb 2017 10:57:44 +0000

76 lines

Influential Research was Re: Three schools of thought about designing

Luke Feast

Sun, 19 Feb 2017 10:34:11 +0000

94 lines

Re: Epistemological Differences -- Research in an Academic Discipline vs. Research in a Professional Practice

Ali Ilhan

Fri, 17 Feb 2017 23:43:23 +0300

183 lines

Re: Epistemological Differences -- Research in an Academic Discipline vs. Research in a Professional Practice

Ali Ilhan

Fri, 17 Feb 2017 23:28:29 +0300

153 lines

Re: Epistemological Differences -- Research in an Academic Discipline vs. Research in a Professional Practice

Ken Friedman

Fri, 17 Feb 2017 17:23:18 +0100

79 lines

Re: Three schools of thought about designing

Erik Stolterman

Fri, 17 Feb 2017 09:17:59 -0500

128 lines

Re: Epistemological Differences -- Research in an Academic Discipline vs. Research in a Professional Practice

Francois Nsenga

Fri, 17 Feb 2017 16:16:13 +0300

73 lines

Re: Epistemological Differences -- Research in an Academic Discipline vs. Research in a Professional Practice

Ken Friedman

Fri, 17 Feb 2017 10:11:45 +0100

248 lines

CfP Learn x Design 2017 The allure of the digital and beyond. London; Cumulus + DRS + Design-ED + Ravensbourne ; 27-30 June 2017

Salmi Eija

Fri, 17 Feb 2017 06:54:06 +0000

79 lines

Re: Being and Design

CHUA Soo Meng Jude (PLS)

Fri, 17 Feb 2017 02:26:41 +0000

48 lines

Re: Epistemological Differences -- Research in an Academic Discipline vs. Research in a Professional Practice

Terence Love

Fri, 17 Feb 2017 09:13:04 +0800

1100 lines

Reactions are sometimes good

Keith Russell

Fri, 17 Feb 2017 00:27:29 +0000

68 lines

Re: Epistemological Differences -- Research in an Academic Discipline vs. Research in a Professional Practice

David Sless

Fri, 17 Feb 2017 11:06:23 +1100

1067 lines

Re: rich qualitative observations (and designing for children)

Thea Blackler

Thu, 16 Feb 2017 22:35:02 +0000

83 lines

Epistemological Differences -- Research in an Academic Discipline vs. Research in a Professional Practice

Ken Friedman

Thu, 16 Feb 2017 23:21:15 +0100

958 lines

Re: Discrimination, opportunity and the non-toothache

Fernando Rojas

Thu, 16 Feb 2017 13:39:39 -0400

120 lines

Herron Lecturer Open Position

EVA ROBERTS

Thu, 16 Feb 2017 10:53:38 -0500

45 lines

Re: rich qualitative observations (and designing for children)

Gabriele Ferri

Thu, 16 Feb 2017 10:16:09 +0100

89 lines

Full-time Lecturer Opening at Herron School of Art + Design in Indianapolis

EVA ROBERTS

Wed, 15 Feb 2017 23:08:54 -0500

138 lines

Re: Three schools of thought about designing

Isaac Holeman

Wed, 15 Feb 2017 23:19:48 +0000

86 lines

Re: Three schools of thought about designing

Krippendorff, Klaus

Wed, 15 Feb 2017 18:59:29 +0000

153 lines

Re: Three schools of thought about designing

Francois Nsenga

Wed, 15 Feb 2017 20:42:15 +0300

98 lines

Re: Three schools of thought about designing

Stephen Matthew Wisniew

Wed, 15 Feb 2017 11:09:22 -0500

325 lines

Re: Three schools of thought about designing

Erik Stolterman

Wed, 15 Feb 2017 09:45:55 -0500

228 lines

Fwd: Canadian doctoral scholarship: patient and public partnership in health

Philippe Gauthier

Wed, 15 Feb 2017 09:44:47 -0500

209 lines

Re: Three schools of thought about designing

Ken Friedman

Wed, 15 Feb 2017 11:25:09 +0100

1194 lines

Re: Three schools of thought about designing

Kommonen Kari-Hans

Wed, 15 Feb 2017 08:12:52 +0000

76 lines

Re: rich qualitative observations (and designing for children)

Oğuz Turan BURUK

Wed, 15 Feb 2017 07:41:06 +0000

57 lines

Re: rich qualitative observations (and designing for children)

Gabriele Ferri

Wed, 15 Feb 2017 07:22:41 +0000

63 lines

Re: Three schools of thought about designing

David Sless

Wed, 15 Feb 2017 11:14:55 +1100

67 lines

Re: Three schools of thought about designing

David Sless

Wed, 15 Feb 2017 11:13:55 +1100

119 lines

Re: Three schools of thought about designing

Terence Love

Wed, 15 Feb 2017 07:32:24 +0800

119 lines

Re: Three schools of thought about designing

Jerry Diethelm

Tue, 14 Feb 2017 15:32:13 -0800

102 lines

Re: Three schools of thought about designing

Ken Friedman

Tue, 14 Feb 2017 23:15:45 +0100

152 lines

Re: rich qualitative observations (and designing for children)

Grace Vetrocq Tuttle

Tue, 14 Feb 2017 13:03:10 -0500

100 lines

Re: three schools of thought about design

GMAIL

Tue, 14 Feb 2017 17:24:13 +0000

34 lines

Re: three schools of thought about design

Nicola Morelli

Tue, 14 Feb 2017 16:47:21 +0000

96 lines

Re: rich qualitative observations (and designing for children)

Gabriele Ferri

Tue, 14 Feb 2017 17:40:39 +0100

62 lines

Re: rich qualitative observations (and designing for children)

Johann van der Merwe

Tue, 14 Feb 2017 18:14:07 +0200

72418 lines

Re: rich qualitative observations (and designing for children)

Matheus Cezarotto

Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:05:13 -0200

71 lines

Re: Three schools of thought about designing

G. Mauricio Mejía

Tue, 14 Feb 2017 10:57:49 -0500

78 lines

Re: rich qualitative observations (and designing for children)

Johann van der Merwe

Tue, 14 Feb 2017 17:47:37 +0200

32381 lines

Re: Three schools of thought about designing

Johann van der Merwe

Tue, 14 Feb 2017 17:40:21 +0200

141 lines

rich qualitative observations (and designing for children)

Gabriele Ferri

Tue, 14 Feb 2017 16:12:03 +0100

68 lines

Three schools of thought about designing

Erik Stolterman

Tue, 14 Feb 2017 08:29:43 -0500

77 lines

LAST CALL FOR WORKSHOP PROPOSALS_DMA Conference_Hong Kong

Ida Telalbasic

Mon, 13 Feb 2017 22:29:50 +0000

46221 lines

Call for papers, sIREN Conference 2017: Arts and Digital Practices on 30-31 May 2017

BAKHSHAYESH KARAM Roxana

Mon, 13 Feb 2017 17:02:33 +0000

290 lines

Re: Women in Design

BAKHSHAYESH KARAM Roxana

Mon, 13 Feb 2017 14:53:32 +0000

190 lines

Re: Women in Design

Aslı KAYA

Mon, 13 Feb 2017 14:37:49 +0200

33 lines

Fwd: Call for Submissions - Conference in Beirut

David Durling

Mon, 13 Feb 2017 09:52:24 +0000

105 lines

Next Graphic Design Educators' Network event: 29 March 2017

Robert Harland

Mon, 13 Feb 2017 09:32:10 +0000

65 lines

Re: Discrimination, opportunity and the non-toothache

Keith Russell

Mon, 13 Feb 2017 08:49:16 +0000

60 lines

Re: Discrimination, opportunity and the non-toothache

Hans Haenlein

Mon, 13 Feb 2017 08:01:04 +0000

143 lines

Re: Discrimination, opportunity and the non-toothache

Johann van der Merwe

Mon, 13 Feb 2017 09:03:25 +0200

88 lines

Re: Discrimination, opportunity and the non-toothache

Keith Russell

Mon, 13 Feb 2017 03:08:37 +0000

70 lines

Re: Discrimination, opportunity and the non-toothache

Fernando Rojas

Sun, 12 Feb 2017 22:04:20 -0400

80 lines

Social Design of Technical Systems -- Free Book, Online and Open Access

Ken Friedman

Fri, 10 Feb 2017 18:59:17 +0100

53 lines

Experiencing Food: Designing Dialogues - Call for Papers

SARA VELEZ ESTEVÃO

Fri, 10 Feb 2017 15:26:39 +0000

55 lines

Re: Papaneck story

Terence Love

Fri, 10 Feb 2017 15:44:18 +0800

64 lines

Re: About Social Design

Terence Love

Fri, 10 Feb 2017 15:34:33 +0800

298 lines

Re: Papaneck story

"Prof. Dr. Bernhard E. Bürdek"

Fri, 10 Feb 2017 08:29:44 +0100

54 lines

Papaneck story

Keith Russell

Fri, 10 Feb 2017 06:06:21 +0000

28 lines

Re: About Social Design

David Sless

Fri, 10 Feb 2017 16:39:50 +1100

219 lines

Re: About Social Design

Terence Love

Fri, 10 Feb 2017 12:47:06 +0800

175 lines

Re: About Social Design

David Sless

Fri, 10 Feb 2017 13:33:01 +1100

75 lines

Re: Are Politicians Designers

David Sless

Fri, 10 Feb 2017 13:10:14 +1100

144 lines

Re: NEW DISCUSSION: INTERDISCIPLINARITY

Stanislav Roudavski

Fri, 10 Feb 2017 00:04:08 +0000

50 lines

Re: NEW DISCUSSION: INTERDISCIPLINARITY

David Sless

Fri, 10 Feb 2017 11:03:42 +1100

97 lines

Re: NEW DISCUSSION: INTERDISCIPLINARITY

Stanislav Roudavski

Thu, 9 Feb 2017 23:44:17 +0000

43 lines

Re: Discrimination, opportunity and the non-toothache

Keith Russell

Thu, 9 Feb 2017 22:15:36 +0000

95 lines

PhD Summer School, Malta & Germany 2017

Jonathan C. Borg

Thu, 9 Feb 2017 23:12:04 +0100

61 lines

OPERATING MANUAL FOR LIVING IN THE WORST CASE SCENARIO

Emily Candela

Thu, 9 Feb 2017 19:53:08 +0000

87 lines

Re: About Social Design

Anne-Marie Willis

Thu, 9 Feb 2017 19:50:19 +0000

29 lines

Re: Discrimination, opportunity and the non-toothache

Fernando Rojas

Thu, 9 Feb 2017 13:41:30 -0400

102 lines

Fwd: SIGraDI 2017 llamado a resúmenes | call for abstracts | Chamada para resumos

Leonardo Parra

Thu, 9 Feb 2017 11:45:21 -0500

787 lines

Re: NEW DISCUSSION: INTERDISCIPLINARITY

Ali Ilhan

Thu, 9 Feb 2017 15:44:09 +0300

60 lines

CfP Journal of Peer Production 12: Shared Machines

Kat Braybrooke

Thu, 9 Feb 2017 12:37:12 +0000

152 lines

Re: Being and Design

K4RNA

Thu, 9 Feb 2017 16:53:30 +0700

240 lines

AW: About social design

Madelaine Berlis

Thu, 9 Feb 2017 10:30:54 +0100

146 lines

Re: NEW DISCUSSION: INTERDISCIPLINARITY

Francois Nsenga

Thu, 9 Feb 2017 09:21:52 +0300

33 lines

Re: Enthymemes and delightful interactions

Omar Sosa Tzec

Thu, 9 Feb 2017 01:03:25 -0500

159 lines

Re: About social design

Francois Nsenga

Thu, 9 Feb 2017 08:34:01 +0300

37 lines

Re: NEW DISCUSSION: INTERDISCIPLINARITY

David Sless

Thu, 9 Feb 2017 14:59:35 +1100

99 lines

Re: NEW DISCUSSION: INTERDISCIPLINARITY

Kate Tregloan

Thu, 9 Feb 2017 14:55:56 +1100

272 lines

Re: NEW DISCUSSION: INTERDISCIPLINARITY

Lois Frankel

Thu, 9 Feb 2017 02:25:18 +0000

153 lines

Re: NEW DISCUSSION: INTERDISCIPLINARITY

Lois Frankel

Thu, 9 Feb 2017 02:22:23 +0000

58 lines

Re: About social design

Terence Love

Thu, 9 Feb 2017 08:55:32 +0800

95 lines

Re: About social design

Nynke Tromp - IO

Thu, 9 Feb 2017 00:17:39 +0000

74 lines

Cut the tail off the emails?

Keith Russell

Wed, 8 Feb 2017 22:09:16 +0000

40 lines

Re: Are politicians designers?

Philippe Gauthier

Wed, 8 Feb 2017 12:57:38 -0500

493 lines

Re: Being and Design

jean schneider

Wed, 8 Feb 2017 18:51:00 +0100

179 lines

Re: NEW DISCUSSION: INTERDISCIPLINARITY

Gabriele Ferri

Wed, 8 Feb 2017 18:31:06 +0100

203 lines

Re: NEW DISCUSSION: INTERDISCIPLINARITY

Johann van der Merwe

Wed, 8 Feb 2017 19:19:16 +0200

160 lines

Re: NEW DISCUSSION: INTERDISCIPLINARITY

Johann van der Merwe

Wed, 8 Feb 2017 19:03:47 +0200

97 lines

Re: About social design

Eugenia Chiara

Wed, 8 Feb 2017 18:01:35 +0100

73 lines

Re: Re :Re: About social design

azza rajhi

Wed, 8 Feb 2017 15:03:58 +0000

183 lines

Re: Re :RE: About social design

"Prof. Dr. Bernhard E. Bürdek"

Wed, 8 Feb 2017 16:03:22 +0100

99 lines

Re: Being and Design

jean schneider

Wed, 8 Feb 2017 15:49:47 +0100

167 lines

Re: Re :Re: About social design

azza rajhi

Wed, 8 Feb 2017 14:33:38 +0000

168 lines

Re: Re :Re: About social design

Isaac Arturo

Wed, 8 Feb 2017 14:22:21 +0000

148 lines

Re :Re: About social design

azza rajhi

Wed, 8 Feb 2017 13:38:13 +0000

121 lines

Re :RE: About social design

azza rajhi

Wed, 8 Feb 2017 13:17:12 +0000

78 lines

Re: About social design

Isaac Arturo

Wed, 8 Feb 2017 13:15:28 +0000

101 lines

Re: About social design

Terence Love

Wed, 8 Feb 2017 20:54:23 +0800

67 lines

About social design

azza rajhi

Wed, 8 Feb 2017 12:41:17 +0000

42 lines

Re: Are Politicians Designers

Christopher Lutterodt - Quarcoo

Wed, 8 Feb 2017 11:50:36 +0000

115 lines

Re: Design for behabiour change

BAKHSHAYESH KARAM Roxana

Wed, 8 Feb 2017 10:22:28 +0000

224 lines

Re: Women in Design

GMAIL

Wed, 8 Feb 2017 10:04:19 +0000

48 lines

Enthymemes and delightful interactions

Keith Russell

Wed, 8 Feb 2017 04:35:42 +0000

110 lines

Re: Design for behabiour change

Omar Sosa Tzec

Tue, 7 Feb 2017 22:01:11 -0500

143 lines

Re: NEW DISCUSSION: INTERDISCIPLINARITY

Paul Thibaudeau

Wed, 8 Feb 2017 00:35:36 +0000

228 lines

Re: Design for behabiour change

Veronika Kelly

Wed, 8 Feb 2017 10:40:50 +1030

82 lines

Re: NEW DISCUSSION: INTERDISCIPLINARITY

Kate Tregloan

Wed, 8 Feb 2017 09:28:48 +1100

167 lines

Re: Women in Design

Heidi Overhill

Tue, 7 Feb 2017 17:56:22 +0000

64 lines

Re: NEW DISCUSSION: INTERDISCIPLINARITY

Ali Ilhan

Tue, 7 Feb 2017 20:30:17 +0300

93 lines

[IJDesign] CfP Reminder: Special Issue on Designing for Systems of Smart Things

Lin-Lin Chen

Tue, 7 Feb 2017 15:43:02 +0000

50 lines

Re: Are politicians designers?

Ruth STEVENS

Tue, 7 Feb 2017 14:02:22 +0100

359 lines

Re: NEW DISCUSSION: INTERDISCIPLINARITY

Stephen Boyd Davis

Tue, 7 Feb 2017 11:03:45 +0000

196 lines

CfA Spring University “CAx: Dimensions of Computer-Aid in Architecture, Biological Sciences, Design and Medicine”, 2-7 April, 2017, Image Knowledge Gestaltung, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin

Spring School CAx

Tue, 7 Feb 2017 11:50:28 +0100

1783 lines

Re: Are politicians designers?

Nynke Tromp - IO

Tue, 7 Feb 2017 10:30:10 +0000

214 lines

Re: NEW DISCUSSION: INTERDISCIPLINARITY

Susan Hagan

Tue, 7 Feb 2017 10:18:35 +0000

58 lines

Re: NEW DISCUSSION: INTERDISCIPLINARITY

Gabriele Ferri

Tue, 7 Feb 2017 10:59:45 +0100

70 lines

Re: NEW DISCUSSION: INTERDISCIPLINARITY

David Sless

Tue, 7 Feb 2017 19:50:20 +1100

64 lines

Re: Discrimination, opportunity and the non-toothache

Keith Russell

Tue, 7 Feb 2017 02:32:31 +0000

108 lines

Re: Are Politicians Designers

David Sless

Tue, 7 Feb 2017 13:04:56 +1100

65 lines

Re: NEW DISCUSSION: INTERDISCIPLINARITY

Filippo Salustri

Mon, 6 Feb 2017 20:46:15 -0500

101 lines

Re: NEW DISCUSSION: INTERDISCIPLINARITY

Lois Frankel

Tue, 7 Feb 2017 01:32:15 +0000

88 lines

Re: Discrimination, opportunity and the non-toothache

Fernando Rojas

Mon, 6 Feb 2017 21:26:30 -0400

172 lines

Re: NEW DISCUSSION: INTERDISCIPLINARITY

Filippo Salustri

Mon, 6 Feb 2017 20:16:07 -0500

100 lines

NEW DISCUSSION: INTERDISCIPLINARITY

Lois Frankel

Tue, 7 Feb 2017 01:02:39 +0000

60 lines

Re: Are Politicians Designers

Krippendorff, Klaus

Mon, 6 Feb 2017 17:48:59 +0000

85 lines

Re: Are Politicians Designers

Gunnar Swanson

Mon, 6 Feb 2017 11:27:17 -0500

54 lines

Re: Are Politicians Designers

Krippendorff, Klaus

Mon, 6 Feb 2017 16:19:08 +0000

87 lines

#DeL17: Teaching Making/Making Teaching: Call for papers

Roeschmann, Claudia

Mon, 6 Feb 2017 16:17:14 +0000

93 lines

Re: Are Politicians Designers

Alma Hoffmann

Mon, 6 Feb 2017 10:16:55 -0600

101 lines

Re: Are Politicians Designers

GMAIL

Mon, 6 Feb 2017 16:16:04 +0000

101 lines

Re: Are Politicians Designers

Gunnar Swanson

Mon, 6 Feb 2017 10:40:30 -0500

54 lines

Re: Knowledge can not be objective

Jimmy Tidey

Mon, 6 Feb 2017 11:46:24 +0000

131 lines

Re: Are politicians designers?

Terence Love

Mon, 6 Feb 2017 19:31:34 +0800

225 lines

Re: Are politicians designers?

Krippendorff, Klaus

Mon, 6 Feb 2017 08:15:19 +0000

139 lines

Fringe Areas of Fact Generation

Ken Friedman

Mon, 6 Feb 2017 08:33:05 +0100

78 lines

Re: Being and Design

CHUA Soo Meng Jude (PLS)

Mon, 6 Feb 2017 07:10:56 +0000

64 lines

Re: Are Politicians Designers

Francois Nsenga

Mon, 6 Feb 2017 09:01:20 +0300

56 lines

Re: Being and Design

CHUA Soo Meng Jude (PLS)

Mon, 6 Feb 2017 02:59:41 +0000

58 lines

Re: Is the Post-Modern under threat?

Stephen B Allard

Mon, 6 Feb 2017 01:02:06 +0000

37 lines

Re: Is the Post-Modern under threat?

Gunnar Swanson

Sun, 5 Feb 2017 18:28:38 -0500

73 lines

Re: Are Politicians Designers

David Sless

Mon, 6 Feb 2017 09:44:35 +1100

106 lines

Re: Is the Post-Modern under threat?

Stephen B Allard

Sun, 5 Feb 2017 22:35:58 +0000

51 lines

Re: Show & Share

Lois Frankel

Sun, 5 Feb 2017 21:30:43 +0000

172 lines

Design CFPs posted to DesignCalls in January 2017

Filippo Salustri

Sun, 5 Feb 2017 11:22:51 -0500

91 lines

Are Politicians Designers

Chris Smith

Sun, 5 Feb 2017 15:11:32 +0000

76 lines

Re: Are politicians designers?

Shujoy Chakraborty

Sun, 5 Feb 2017 11:20:01 +0000

413 lines

TENURE-TRACK FACULTY POSITION IN NEW MEDIA AT UNIVERSITY OF MAINE

Ken Friedman

Sun, 5 Feb 2017 10:59:48 +0100

54 lines

Re: Show & Share

Teena Clerke

Sun, 5 Feb 2017 14:53:48 +1100

153 lines

Re: Show & Share

liliana rodriguez

Sun, 5 Feb 2017 02:29:03 +0000

125 lines

Re: Show & Share

Katherine J Hepworth

Sun, 5 Feb 2017 02:20:32 +0000

62 lines

Re: Knowledge can not be objective

Filippo Salustri

Sat, 4 Feb 2017 21:08:18 -0500

161 lines

REMINDER: Job Positions at OCAD University in the Faculty of Design

Tunstall, Dori

Sun, 5 Feb 2017 01:52:59 +0000

135 lines

Re: Discrimination, opportunity and the non-toothache

Keith Russell

Sun, 5 Feb 2017 00:48:55 +0000

183 lines

Re: Are politicians designers?

Lubomir Savov Popov

Sat, 4 Feb 2017 21:16:33 +0000

223 lines

Re: Study about mindfulness and creative collaboration

Fernando Rojas

Sat, 4 Feb 2017 14:04:30 -0400

122 lines

Re: Are politicians designers?

João DeSouzaLeite

Sat, 4 Feb 2017 14:49:18 -0200

179 lines

Re: Are politicians designers?

Ken Friedman

Sat, 4 Feb 2017 16:50:09 +0100

96 lines

Re: Are politicians designers?

Terence Love

Sat, 4 Feb 2017 18:11:57 +0800

47 lines

Open Faculty Positions at Bilkent University, Ankara

Nilgun Olgunturk

Sat, 4 Feb 2017 13:03:02 +0300

73 lines

Re: Are politicians designers?

Ali Ilhan

Sat, 4 Feb 2017 11:55:51 +0300

126 lines

Re: Are politicians designers?

Ali Ilhan

Sat, 4 Feb 2017 11:49:34 +0300

102 lines

Re: Are politicians designers?

Krippendorff, Klaus

Sat, 4 Feb 2017 07:31:12 +0000

59 lines

Re: Are politicians designers?

Francois Nsenga

Sat, 4 Feb 2017 10:09:50 +0300

52 lines

Re: Are politicians designers?

Francois Nsenga

Sat, 4 Feb 2017 09:41:17 +0300

207 lines

Re: Are politicians designers?

Krippendorff, Klaus

Sat, 4 Feb 2017 06:38:23 +0000

189 lines

Re: Being and Design

Fenn, Terence

Sat, 4 Feb 2017 04:56:32 +0000

144 lines

Re: Are politicians designers?

Terence Love

Sat, 4 Feb 2017 09:29:39 +0800

152 lines

Re: Is the Post-Modern under threat?

Gunnar Swanson

Fri, 3 Feb 2017 19:56:03 -0500

68 lines

Re: Talking Sense to Power

Keith Russell

Sat, 4 Feb 2017 00:22:29 +0000

42 lines

Re: Are politicians designers?

Francois Nsenga

Fri, 3 Feb 2017 23:40:28 +0300

122 lines

Re: Are politicians designers?

Elizabeth Goodman

Fri, 3 Feb 2017 12:00:01 -0800

100 lines

Re: Women in Design

Thea Blackler

Fri, 3 Feb 2017 19:55:19 +0000

103 lines

Re: Useful and interesting from Quanta Magazine

Francois Nsenga

Fri, 3 Feb 2017 22:12:16 +0300

61 lines

Re: Is the Post-Modern under threat?

Gunnar Swanson

Fri, 3 Feb 2017 14:06:03 -0500

109 lines

Show & Share

Milena Radzikowska

Fri, 3 Feb 2017 18:22:23 +0000

62 lines

Re: Women in Design

Krippendorff, Klaus

Fri, 3 Feb 2017 18:05:08 +0000

72 lines

Useful and interesting from Quanta Magazine

Bob Este

Fri, 3 Feb 2017 10:39:55 -0700

22 lines

eNTERFACE'17, 13th International Summer Workshop on Multimodal Interfaces : Final project proposal submission deadline (10 February)

Luís Teixeira

Fri, 3 Feb 2017 17:34:52 +0000

172 lines

Re: Women in Design

Milena Radzikowska

Fri, 3 Feb 2017 17:29:44 +0000

74 lines

Re: Talking Sense to Power

Krippendorff, Klaus

Fri, 3 Feb 2017 16:58:20 +0000

68 lines

Re: Being and Design

Jinan K B

Fri, 3 Feb 2017 22:22:06 +0530

83 lines

Re: Are politicians designers?

Terence Love

Sat, 4 Feb 2017 00:23:30 +0800

226 lines

Re: Are politicians designers?

Mitchell Sipus

Fri, 3 Feb 2017 10:37:03 -0500

155 lines

Planning to hire teacher/researcher, graphic design: availability?

Jonas Löwgren

Fri, 3 Feb 2017 13:01:54 +0000

39 lines

Re: Are politicians designers?

Johann van der Merwe

Fri, 3 Feb 2017 12:44:33 +0200

66 lines

Re: Are politicians designers?

Ali Ilhan

Fri, 3 Feb 2017 11:36:00 +0300

58 lines

Re: Being and Design

CHUA Soo Meng Jude (PLS)

Fri, 3 Feb 2017 07:06:17 +0000

70 lines

Re: Being and Design

CHUA Soo Meng Jude (PLS)

Fri, 3 Feb 2017 07:05:56 +0000

51 lines

Re: Being and Design

Fenn, Terence

Fri, 3 Feb 2017 06:55:52 +0000

41 lines

Re: Being and Design

Kommonen Kari-Hans

Fri, 3 Feb 2017 06:42:40 +0000

32 lines

Re: Knowledge can not be objective

Johann van der Merwe

Fri, 3 Feb 2017 07:13:05 +0200

80 lines

Re: Being and Design

CHUA Soo Meng Jude (PLS)

Fri, 3 Feb 2017 05:01:47 +0000

66 lines

Re: Knowledge can not be objective

Stanislav Roudavski

Fri, 3 Feb 2017 03:57:15 +0000

24 lines

Re: Being and Design

Gaughwin, Melinda - gaumy001

Fri, 3 Feb 2017 03:54:19 +0000

50 lines

Re: Being and Design

Gaughwin, Melinda - gaumy001

Fri, 3 Feb 2017 03:49:01 +0000

47 lines

Re: Talking Sense to Power

Keith Russell

Fri, 3 Feb 2017 03:19:07 +0000

64 lines

Re: Are politicians designers?

David Sless

Fri, 3 Feb 2017 13:43:48 +1100

77 lines

Being and Design

CHUA Soo Meng Jude (PLS)

Fri, 3 Feb 2017 02:25:37 +0000

34 lines

Re: Are politicians designers?

Mitchell Sipus

Thu, 2 Feb 2017 21:02:53 -0500

200 lines

Re: Are politicians designers?

Terence Love

Fri, 3 Feb 2017 08:57:18 +0800

72 lines

Re: Are politicians designers?

Morgan, Bill

Fri, 3 Feb 2017 00:07:13 +0000

59 lines

Re: Is the Post-Modern under threat?

Stephen B Allard

Thu, 2 Feb 2017 23:44:46 +0000

78 lines

Re: Are politicians designers?

G. Mauricio Mejía

Thu, 2 Feb 2017 18:16:09 -0500

75 lines

Re: Are politicians designers?

Ken Friedman

Thu, 2 Feb 2017 22:50:09 +0100

171 lines

Re: Are politicians designers?

Krippendorff, Klaus

Thu, 2 Feb 2017 21:20:50 +0000

172 lines

Re: Are politicians designers?

McDonagh, Deana C

Thu, 2 Feb 2017 19:01:59 +0000

171 lines

Re: Are politicians designers?

Mark Evans

Thu, 2 Feb 2017 18:59:21 +0000

134 lines

Re: Talking Sense to Power

Gabriele Ferri

Thu, 2 Feb 2017 19:08:22 +0100

36 lines

Re: Knowledge can not be objective

Jeremy Hunsinger

Thu, 2 Feb 2017 11:29:30 -0500

53 lines

Re: Are politicians designers?

Luke Feast

Thu, 2 Feb 2017 16:18:46 +0000

71 lines

Re: Knowledge can not be objective

Johann van der Merwe

Thu, 2 Feb 2017 18:12:24 +0200

72 lines

Re: Are politicians designers?

jack Ox

Thu, 2 Feb 2017 08:22:12 -0700

125 lines

Are politicians designers?

G. Mauricio Mejía

Thu, 2 Feb 2017 10:13:50 -0500

101 lines

Re: Talking Sense to Power

Lubomir Savov Popov

Thu, 2 Feb 2017 14:37:55 +0000

221 lines

Re: A question about the history of Design Research

Terence Love

Thu, 2 Feb 2017 22:08:34 +0800

195 lines

Re: Knowledge can not be objective

Jimmy Tidey

Thu, 2 Feb 2017 11:11:04 +0000

118 lines

Re: Talking Sense to Power

Gabriele Ferri

Thu, 2 Feb 2017 12:09:59 +0100

65 lines

Re: Talking Sense to Power

Francois Nsenga

Thu, 2 Feb 2017 13:59:24 +0300

105 lines

Extended CFP: 4T, 12th International Design and Design History Symposium

Osman Demirbas

Thu, 2 Feb 2017 12:48:29 +0200

1989 lines

Re: Talking Sense to Power

Francois Nsenga

Thu, 2 Feb 2017 13:34:05 +0300

248 lines

Re: Talking Sense to Power

Sarah Teasley

Thu, 2 Feb 2017 09:56:01 +0000

224 lines

Re: A question about the history of Design Research

Francois Nsenga

Thu, 2 Feb 2017 10:17:19 +0300

61 lines

Re: Red Wheel Barrows and three literary identities

Francois Nsenga

Thu, 2 Feb 2017 09:59:08 +0300

61 lines

Re: Luiza Prado (@luizaprado) replied to your Tweet!

Krippendorff, Klaus

Thu, 2 Feb 2017 04:52:34 +0000

81 lines

Re: Luiza Prado (@luizaprado) replied to your Tweet!

Paul Mike Zender

Thu, 2 Feb 2017 03:39:09 +0000

28 lines

Re: Is the Post-Modern under threat?

Keith Russell

Thu, 2 Feb 2017 03:32:04 +0000

95 lines

Re: Is the Post-Modern under threat?

Stuart MEDLEY

Thu, 2 Feb 2017 10:20:47 +0800

199 lines

Re: Is the Post-Modern under threat?

Katherine J Hepworth

Thu, 2 Feb 2017 01:34:36 +0000

108 lines

Re: Is the Post-Modern under threat?

David Sless

Thu, 2 Feb 2017 12:09:16 +1100

91 lines

Talking Sense to Power

Keith Russell

Thu, 2 Feb 2017 01:05:55 +0000

128 lines

Re: Luiza Prado (@luizaprado) replied to your Tweet!

Paul Mike Zender

Thu, 2 Feb 2017 00:57:24 +0000

62 lines

Re: A question about the history of Design Research

Terence Love

Thu, 2 Feb 2017 08:22:11 +0800

157 lines

Is the Post-Modern under threat?

Stephen B Allard

Thu, 2 Feb 2017 00:12:12 +0000

68 lines

High Horses and Push Bikes

Keith Russell

Wed, 1 Feb 2017 23:31:53 +0000

34 lines

Re: Red Wheel Barrows and three literary identities

Keith Russell

Wed, 1 Feb 2017 23:22:16 +0000

50 lines

Re: A question about the history of Design Research

David Sless

Thu, 2 Feb 2017 09:35:16 +1100

90 lines

Re: A question about the history of Design Research

David Sless

Thu, 2 Feb 2017 09:33:14 +1100

133 lines

Extended CFP: International Design Organisations: Histories, Legacies, Values

Dora Souza Dias

Wed, 1 Feb 2017 21:47:21 +0000

148 lines

Re: Jumping a burning ship

Lois Frankel

Wed, 1 Feb 2017 20:07:15 +0000

192 lines

Re: Jumping a burning ship

Pete Davis

Wed, 1 Feb 2017 19:15:40 +0000

133 lines

Re: two suggestions

Ursula Tischner

Wed, 1 Feb 2017 20:03:12 +0100

153 lines

Re: Jumping a burning ship

Sarah Teasley

Wed, 1 Feb 2017 18:41:01 +0000

135 lines

Re: two suggestions

Katherine J Hepworth

Wed, 1 Feb 2017 16:17:08 +0000

61 lines

Re: Women in Design

Veronica Ranner

Wed, 1 Feb 2017 15:56:37 +0000

76 lines

Women in Design

Marcio Dupont

Wed, 1 Feb 2017 13:43:17 -0200

46 lines

Diversity Champions: 8 Schools That Aren't Just Paying Lip Service To Diversity

Gjoko Muratovski

Wed, 1 Feb 2017 15:18:33 +0000

55 lines

Discrimination, opportunity and the non-toothache

Fernando Rojas

Wed, 1 Feb 2017 11:15:24 -0400

184 lines

Re: Jumping a burning ship

clare bell

Wed, 1 Feb 2017 14:44:37 +0000

265 lines

Re: Jumping a burning ship

Clive Dilnot

Wed, 1 Feb 2017 09:36:37 -0500

207 lines

Elke IELEGEMS

Wed, 1 Feb 2017 14:42:12 +0100

37 lines

Re: A question about the history of Design Research

avsar gurpinar

Wed, 1 Feb 2017 15:36:07 +0300

95 lines

Re: Red Wheel Barrows and three literary identities

Francois Nsenga

Wed, 1 Feb 2017 11:38:03 +0300

193 lines

On Digging Wells

Keith Russell

Wed, 1 Feb 2017 05:14:12 +0000

93 lines

Re: A question about the history of Design Research

Stefan Holmlid

Wed, 1 Feb 2017 05:05:22 +0000

28 lines

Re: A question about the history of Design Research

Curt Lund

Tue, 31 Jan 2017 22:57:16 -0600

48 lines

Re: A question about the history of Design Research

Terence Love

Wed, 1 Feb 2017 12:30:36 +0800

56 lines

Jumping a burning ship

Milena Radzikowska

Tue, 31 Jan 2017 20:40:16 -0700

76 lines

Re: A question about the history of Design Research

Don Norman

Tue, 31 Jan 2017 19:33:45 -0800

93 lines

Re: A question about the history of Design Research

Terence Love

Wed, 1 Feb 2017 10:21:50 +0800

151 lines

Red Wheel Barrows and three literary identities

Keith Russell

Wed, 1 Feb 2017 02:08:59 +0000

145 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager