Nice to hear from you Bridget..and welcome
Following the chat with Stephen Allen about broadening our discussions I
think it would be most worthwhile to have engage .. Is there a maximum for
such lists or infinity...
Vicky
On Mon, 26 Jul 1999, Bridget Baldwin wrote:
> Re. opening list to non-members
> I am a non-active GEM member and an Exec member of engage. My work straddles museums and galleries and I'm aware of the unexploited common ground between GEM and engage. Since joining this mailbase 2 weeks ago I already feel so much better informed about and involved with museum education. I think more gallery educators joining this list would be of mutual benefit. They may feel encouraged to join GEM as well as engage. If you are open to non-members joining, can I tell engage colleagues about this list? I won't do so until I hear your comments.
>
> Re. National Curriculum consultation.
> engage also felt strongly about the omission of museums/galleries from the Art curriculum in the main document. It was made clear that this was one thing that would not change. There would however be mention in the teachers' support materials.
>
> Best Wishes
> Bridget Baldwin ([log in to unmask])
>
>
>
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|