JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for WEBSITE-INFO-MGT Archives


WEBSITE-INFO-MGT Archives

WEBSITE-INFO-MGT Archives


WEBSITE-INFO-MGT@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

WEBSITE-INFO-MGT Home

WEBSITE-INFO-MGT Home

WEBSITE-INFO-MGT  1998

WEBSITE-INFO-MGT 1998

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Design brief for accessibility

From:

Brian Kelly <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Brian Kelly <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 22 Sep 1998 18:58:31 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (186 lines)

  At last week's workshop on Institutional Web Management there was a
session on Institutional Web Design which included discussion on preparing a
design brief.  There was also a talk from Paul Booth from the DISinHE Centre
(see http://www.disinhe.ac.uk/) on accessibility and the web which attracted
a lot of interest.
   Those of you who are interested in design briefs and accessibility may be
interested in the following message.

Thanks

Brian

------------------------------------------------------
Brian Kelly, UK Web Focus
UKOLN, University of Bath, BATH, England, BA2 7AY
Email:  [log in to unmask]     URL:    http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/
Homepage: http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/ukoln/staff/b.kelly.html
Phone:  01225 323943            FAX:   01225 826838
-----Original Message-----
From: Eileen Bonfiglio <[log in to unmask]>
To: Robert Neff <[log in to unmask]>; [log in to unmask]
<[log in to unmask]>
Cc: 'Al Gilman' <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tuesday, September 22, 1998 7:52 PM
Subject: Re: WAI and govt contracts


>Perhaps, large Gov't agencies will suffer these maladies, you are correct.
>Maybe, it is time for the local Gov't agencies to step up to the plate and
>lead the way.  I am an Internet Specialist/Program Manager/WebMaster (and a
>few other titles yet to be discovered I am sure) for a growing City in
>Florida and that is what I have done.  We contracted our site to be built
>for us in the interest of time, our contract scope/statement of work reads
>something like this:
>
>3.9.3. Images and Image Maps
>3.9.3.1. All images and image maps have alternative text.
>3.9.3.2. Graphics that present important information (especially charts,
>tables, and diagrams) have an associated longer description of the graphic
>(i.e., via a description link or the "longdesc" attribute) Furthermore,
>authors have included internal text in images for formats that support it.
>3.9.3.3. All image maps are accessible and keyboard navigable.
Furthermore:
>For each client-side image map, each of the map's links has an associated
>description.   For each server-side image map, lists of the maps links are
>provided as text links (on the same page, on an alternative page that is
>accessible, or within the body of the OBJECT element).
>3.9.3.4. Images used as links have descriptive link titles.
>
>3.9.4. Applets & Scripts
>3.9.4.1. Alternative presentations (text files, etc.) of content are
>provided for applets and scripts that convey information.
>3.9.4.2. Alternative mechanisms are provided for applets and scripts that
>perform an important function (other than the presentation of information).
>3.9.4.3. All Applets that require user interaction that cannot be
duplicated
>in an alternative format are to be directly accessible.
>3.9.4.4. The user can freeze any moving or blinking text.
>3.9.4.5. Applets have alternative text ("alt" on APPLET, "title" on
OBJECT).
>
>3.9.5. Audio & Video
>3.9.5.1. All audio information has an associated transcript.
>3.9.5.2. All video information has an associated audio description.
>3.9.5.3. All video information has an associated transcript.
>3.9.5.4. Transcripts and audio descriptions are synchronized with
>audio/video information, either directly or via a synchronization file.
>3.9.5.5. Sounds that play automatically have a visual notification that the
>sound is playing.
>
>3.9.6. Tables
>3.9.6.1. Table cells are explicitly associated with row and column labels.
>3.9.6.2. Lengthy row and column labels are abbreviated.
>3.9.6.3. Tables used to arrange text documents in columns shall have a
>summary (as all tables will) describing contents.
>3.9.6.4. For more complex tables, information is grouped into categories.
>3.9.6.5. Table summaries are available, nested in the <table> tag.
>3.9.6.6. Phone number (xxx) xxx-xxx and/or e-mail address (webmaster@ my
>city) will be provided if tables can not be made accessible.
>
>3.9.7.  Links
>3.9.7.1. Link text makes sense when read out of context, but is not too
>verbose.
>3.9.7.2. Lists of links have non-link, printable characters (surrounded by
>spaces) between them.
>
>3.9.8.  Frames
>3.9.8.1. Each frame document (the FRAMESET element) has a non-frame
>alternative (e.g., the NOFRAME element)
>3.9.8.2. An image does not appear directly in a frame but is part of a
>document included in a frame.
>3.9.8.3. All frames have titles.
>3.9.8.4. Links to descriptions of the purpose and layout of frames are
>provided.
>3.9.9. User Input Forms
>3.9.9.1. Image maps are not used to create graphical "submit" buttons.
>3.9.9.2. Each label is associated with its form control.
>3.9.9.3. Images used as "submit" buttons have alternative text.
>3.9.9.4. An alternative phone number, fax number, e-mail address, or postal
>mail address is provided for submitting information.
>3.9.9.5. Form elements have keyboard shortcuts (with the "accesskey"
>attribute).
>3.9.9.6. Menu options are grouped (with the OPTGROUP element).
>3.9.9.7. Groups of controls are labeled (with the LEGEND element).
>3.9.9.8. Related controls are grouped (with the FIELDSET element).
>3.9.9.9. A logical tab order is specified (with the "tabindex" attribute).
>
>3.9.10. Site shall have a consistent look and feel and be representative
>of the City of <snip>.
>3.9.11. Site shall be non-browser specific.
>3.9.12. Site shall also comply with HTML 4.0 Specification, W3C
>Recommendation, revised on 24-Apr-1998 and be able to attain approval from
>CAST for accessibility.
>3.9.13. Do not use non-html technologies to display text unless an
>accessible version of the page(s) is provided as well. (I.e. PDF).
>3.9.14. If "OBJECT" is used to embed any components, provide description
>within the "title" of the element, since "OBJECT" does not have "alt."
>3.9.15. Avoid blinking or updating of the screen, which can cause flicker
>between 4 and 59 hertz.
>3.9.16. Ensure that pages using newer technology will fail gracefully if
the
>technology is not supported or is turned off. This includes frames,
scripts,
>style sheets and applets, and other new or proprietary features. Make
>information redundant as necessary.
>3.9.17. Provide a site map in plain text as well as HTML format.
>3.9.18. Style sheets should be used to control layout and presentation
>wherever possible, however, tables are permitted providing requirement
>3.9.6. is met.
>3.9.19. Accommodate older browsers with information and instructions on how
>to upgrade the browser in both plain text and HTML clear format.
>3.9.20. Browser detection scripting tools shall be used on all scripted
>pages.
>
><snip> You get the idea.  The contractors are now embroiled in a learning
>process I don't think they would have embarked upon otherwise. I know this
>is small, but - we have to start somewhere.
>
>Happy to take a bite :))
>
>-Eileen
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Robert Neff <[log in to unmask]>
>To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
>Cc: 'Al Gilman' <[log in to unmask]>
>Date: Wednesday, September 02, 1998 2:09 PM
>Subject: RE: WAI and govt contracts
>
>
>>>From Chris Hasser
>>
>>A final note:  I.M.H.O., your comment about contracting officers was not
>>quite complete.  When a contracting officer writes a statement of work,
>>technical details are often supplied by someone more closely involved in
>>the
>>area in question.
>>Rob>  True, and the procurement office will ask for the standards and
>>references.  Could the WAI come up with a policy and reference list.  I
>>know, lets ask Al Gilman! Al, what do you think?
>>
>>So efforts to educate government technology officers
>>would not be in vain.  You might consider targeting the chief information
>>officer for each cabinet department for a letter from the WAI.
>>Rob>  Good idea, but most CIOs do not have much authority.  The position
is
>>still a paper tiger when it comes to agency policy and standards.  Whether
>>or not this changes, it is still a good idea to send a letter from the
WAI.
>> It is a start or a foot in the door. This should also be sent to the
>>Procurements and Contracts Office for each Agency.  How do we make this an
>>action item?  If the Feds require this on a soliticitaion, the IT
>>Contractors will respond and perform to the Statement of Work.
>>
>>Rob>  Chris, please keep us posted on the conference in October.
>>
>>Thanks..rob
>>
>>
>



%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
December 2023
November 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
December 2022
October 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
September 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager