JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN Archives

PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN  October 2019

PHD-DESIGN October 2019

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Who Should Sign an Article? Who Shouldn't?

From:

Ken Friedman <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

PhD-Design - This list is for discussion of PhD studies and related research in <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 25 Oct 2019 11:43:45 +0200

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (43 lines)

Dear Alun,

You wrote, “ There is an interesting parallel between authorship in writing articles and authorship in designing. There are many examples of designers who claim that all work completed in their studio is solely authored by them, despite not having been directly involved in that particular project. A well known example is that of Raymond Lowey who hand signed all drawings completed by his employees. There are some local examples of designers not being given recognition for award winning designs.”

As I see it, this is a problematic analogy. It is not parallel for any of several reasons.

The first and most important difference between design studios and universities is that studios are anchored in the ancient guild culture while universities have built a distinct and different academic culture. The master or owner of a studio pays those who work for him and determines the basis on which work is attributed. This has been the case since prior to the formal organisation of guilds in the Middle Ages. It applies to the studios of Donatello and Vermeer, as well as to the contemporary studios of people such as Loewy. Many studios also use a corporate signature. Under all circumstances, the employees are paid for their work as hourly employees. In copyright law, this is known as “work for hire,” and the signature rights and copyright belong to the employer. It is the employer who decides who will sign and how.

If universities were to employ work for hire rules in the attribution of signature rights, then the signature rights would not belong to professors of any kind, nor to supervisors, department heads, centre directors, or even to deans. The ultimate signing authority would determine signatures — university presidents and vice chancellors, or even the boards of trustees.

However, there is a second reason. Work for hire also requires that the hired employee be paid for the work that he or she executes on behalf of the employer. When Loewy’s employees went home, their time was theirs. If a Loewy employee were to design an airplane or a chair or a bottle at home, Loewy would have had no right to sign it.

We do much of the work that goes into writing a research article outside the theoretical number of hours for which we are paid by a university. When I was a dean, I put in twice as many hours a week as an ordinary professor would do. Admittedly, those kinds of jobs entail that kind of work — but any writing I managed to do, I did at home. The truth is that most academics who work within a workload model do much the same. At many universities, there is a model that suggests a certain amount of time for teaching, a certain amount of time for service tasks, and the rest for research. I have observed that despite the supposed workload model, the teaching required and the tasks assigned often take a full work week, sometimes more. Anyone who manages to write does so on their own time.

The Vancouver Protocol and systems like it are a reasonable basis for signature attribution. Raymond Loewy’s studio and other work for hire systems do not form a parallel. If they did, the people who use positional authority within a system to assert signature rights over against real authors and co-authors would not be the Raymond Loewy-like people or the Donatellos of this world. It would be rather like one of Loewy’s senior employees signing a drawing or the head journeyman in charge of metal fabrication for Donatello signing the work. Instead of usurping the signature rights of a junior employee, they would be using positional authority to usurp the signature authority of the person who owns the firm or the studio.       

In the world of research, it is the researcher and members of the actual research and writing team to whom we award credit.

Yours,

Ken

Ken Friedman, Ph.D., D.Sc. (hc), FDRS | Editor-in-Chief | 设计 She Ji. The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation | Published by Tongji University in Cooperation with Elsevier | URL: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/she-ji-the-journal-of-design-economics-and-innovation/

Chair Professor of Design Innovation Studies | College of Design and Innovation | Tongji University | Shanghai, China ||| Eminent Scholar | College of Design, Art, Architecture, and Planning | University of Cincinnati ||| Email  [log in to unmask] | Academia https://tongji.academia.edu/KenFriedman | D&I http://tjdi.tongji.edu.cn 












-----------------------------------------------------------------
PhD-Design mailing list  <[log in to unmask]>
Discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design
Subscribe or Unsubscribe at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/phd-design
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager