Evening all!
I have just heard the news about the Labour candidate for
Bristol East who revealed "a sample of postal votes on the
social networking website Twitter". See:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/election_2010/england/8652724.stm
"She explained: 'On hearing the results of a random and unscientific
sample of postal votes, I posted them on Twitter.'"
So, it appears, people have been looking at postal votes before
the count?
How come that is possible? Anyone know?
Ted.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) <[log in to unmask]>
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 30-Apr-10 Time: 00:37:53
------------------------------ XFMail ------------------------------
******************************************************
Please note that if you press the 'Reply' button your
message will go only to the sender of this message.
If you want to reply to the whole list, use your mailer's
'Reply-to-All' button to send your message automatically
to [log in to unmask]
Disclaimer: The messages sent to this list are the views of the sender and cannot be assumed to be representative of the range of views held by subscribers to the Radical Statistics Group. To find out more about Radical Statistics and its aims and activities and read current and past issues of our newsletter you are invited to visit our web site www.radstats.org.uk.
*******************************************************
|