JISCMail - RADSTATS Archives

Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Subscriber's Corner

Email Lists

RADSTATS Archives

2005

View:

Show Author | Hide Author

		LISTSERV Archives
		RADSTATS Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Get Password

Subject	From	Date	Size
Re: Crime Statistics and the Home Office	Peter Timusk	Sat, 31 Dec 2005 03:04:45 -0500	489 lines
Re: Crime Statistics and the Home Office	Ray Thomas	Sat, 31 Dec 2005 07:41:13 -0000	102 lines
Progress significantly re-engineered	Ted Harding	Fri, 30 Dec 2005 17:13:05 -0000	65 lines
Crime Statistics and the Home Office	Ted Harding	Fri, 30 Dec 2005 09:54:02 -0000	58 lines
Re: Buncefield	SD McKay	Fri, 23 Dec 2005 12:42:52 -0000	22 lines
Re: Buncefield	Ted Harding	Fri, 23 Dec 2005 12:30:01 -0000	78 lines
Buncefield	John Logsdon	Thu, 22 Dec 2005 22:37:43 +0000	103 lines
Re: Health Statistics Users Group/ RSS Official Statistics Section meeting on disclosure control - please ignore attachment	Macfarlane, Alison	Wed, 21 Dec 2005 16:47:13 -0000	517 lines
Health Statistics Users Group/ RSS Official Statistics Section meeting on disclosure control	Macfarlane, Alison	Wed, 21 Dec 2005 13:47:33 -0000	1438 lines
CCSR Research Associate vacancy	Ludi Simpson	Wed, 21 Dec 2005 12:20:04 +0000	77 lines
Campaign bulletin	Keep Our NHS Public	Fri, 16 Dec 2005 16:25:39 -0000	673 lines
Re: More Strong evidence for the genetics of intelligence	SD McKay	Sun, 11 Dec 2005 16:31:32 -0000	75 lines
Fw: Choice, Markets, Competition in the NHS	Janet Shapiro	Sat, 10 Dec 2005 15:31:17 -0000	99 lines
Statistics and Law meeting	John Logsdon	Fri, 9 Dec 2005 22:18:23 +0000	40 lines
Re: More Strong evidence for the genetics of intelligence	Philip McShane	Fri, 9 Dec 2005 17:15:27 +0000	46 lines
Neoliberal Scotland? Conference call	David Miller	Thu, 8 Dec 2005 18:10:35 +0000	393 lines
Housing Studies Association Spring Conference 2006	Rob Rowlands	Thu, 8 Dec 2005 10:22:24 -0000	11752 lines
Fw: RSS meeting - use and abuse of statistics in Parliament (Warwick meeting 8 Dec)	Janet Shapiro	Wed, 7 Dec 2005 17:05:57 -0000	264 lines
Low IQ Gene discovered	Alan Truelove	Wed, 7 Dec 2005 16:07:06 +0000	28 lines
Re: NHS expenditure	Andrew Philpott	Mon, 5 Dec 2005 19:59:09 +0000	208 lines
Re: More Strong evidence for the genetics of intelligence	David O'Donnell	Mon, 5 Dec 2005 19:29:34 -0000	227 lines
Benchmarking the Knowledge Economy	Graham Room	Mon, 5 Dec 2005 18:03:16 +0000	82 lines
Re: More Strong evidence for the genetics of intelligence	Professor David Gordon	Mon, 5 Dec 2005 16:28:43 +0000	218 lines
More Strong evidence for the genetics of intelligence	Alan Truelove	Mon, 5 Dec 2005 14:27:43 +0000	135 lines
Re: full independence for Office for National Statistics	Allan Reese (Cefas)	Mon, 5 Dec 2005 12:20:42 -0000	49 lines
CORRUPTION AND TRUST	R.Thomas	Fri, 2 Dec 2005 12:14:44 -0000	64 lines
Re: NHS expenditure	Ted Harding	Fri, 2 Dec 2005 10:13:37 -0000	53 lines
NHS expenditure	Ted Harding	Thu, 1 Dec 2005 21:00:18 -0000	38 lines
Re: full independence for Office for National Statistics	Humphrey Southall	Thu, 1 Dec 2005 20:00:40 +0000	43 lines
Re: full independence for Office for National Statistics	R.Thomas	Thu, 1 Dec 2005 19:40:15 -0000	160 lines
Re: full independence for Office for National Statistics	Will McMahon	Thu, 1 Dec 2005 14:32:34 -0000	389 lines
Re: full independence for Office for National Statistics	Greg Phillpotts	Thu, 1 Dec 2005 12:57:26 +0000	326 lines
Re: News: full independence for Office of National Statistics	R.Thomas	Thu, 1 Dec 2005 11:34:33 -0000	157 lines
Re: News: full independence for Office of National Statistics	Mike Brewer	Thu, 1 Dec 2005 10:15:52 +0000	122 lines
Re: full independence for Office for National Statistics	Greg Phillpotts	Thu, 1 Dec 2005 08:46:56 +0000	88 lines
House of commons health committee inquiry: co-payments and charges in the NHS	John Mohan	Wed, 30 Nov 2005 17:51:05 +0000	93 lines
Re: News: full independence for Office of National Statistics	R.Thomas	Wed, 30 Nov 2005 10:27:19 -0000	71 lines
News: full independence for Office of National Statistics	Robin Rice	Mon, 28 Nov 2005 16:57:43 -0000	36 lines
Freedom of information ...	Ted Harding	Sun, 27 Nov 2005 14:24:38 -0000	70 lines
TWO JOBS @ THE UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD	Dimitris Ballas	Wed, 16 Nov 2005 19:14:01 -0000	91 lines
Re: Jobs would be the great benefit	Humphrey Southall	Tue, 15 Nov 2005 15:36:58 +0000	82 lines
Re: Jobs would be the great benefit	Francis Dickinson	Tue, 15 Nov 2005 14:41:16 -0000	35 lines
Re: Jobs would be the great benefit	Philip McShane	Tue, 15 Nov 2005 14:07:08 +0000	40 lines
Jobs would be the great benefit	Ray Thomas	Tue, 15 Nov 2005 13:26:58 -0000	168 lines
Houston, we have ... IT again!	Ted Harding	Sun, 13 Nov 2005 11:52:01 -0000	40 lines
Exam mockery?	Ted Harding	Sun, 13 Nov 2005 09:52:25 -0000	48 lines
FW: BBC Today - DCMS/MORI live music survey	Macfarlane, Alison	Fri, 11 Nov 2005 09:24:28 -0000	392 lines
FW: [actionformusic] DCMS/MORI live music survey.	Macfarlane, Alison	Thu, 10 Nov 2005 17:50:50 -0000	229 lines
FW: DCMS/MORI live music survey claims - press coverage	Macfarlane, Alison	Wed, 9 Nov 2005 19:37:20 -0000	276 lines
Fw: Global Development Network - Open Call for Evaluators	Ray Thomas	Tue, 8 Nov 2005 16:56:20 -0000	55 lines
Re: How should we present statistics?	Chris Webber	Sun, 6 Nov 2005 17:09:55 -0000	118 lines
Re: How should we present statistics?	Paul Spicker	Sun, 6 Nov 2005 15:23:30 -0000	50 lines
Re: How should we present statistics?	Ray Thomas	Sat, 5 Nov 2005 11:08:47 -0000	95 lines
Re: How should we present statistics?	Quentin L. Burrell	Fri, 4 Nov 2005 16:00:00 -0000	56 lines
Re: How should we present statistics?	Allan Reese (Cefas)	Fri, 4 Nov 2005 13:44:33 -0000	45 lines
Re: How should we present statistics?	John Whittington	Fri, 4 Nov 2005 13:23:21 +0000	96 lines
Re: How should we present statistics?	Ray Thomas	Fri, 4 Nov 2005 10:27:06 -0000	173 lines
Re: How should we present statistics?	Paul Spicker	Wed, 2 Nov 2005 21:31:53 -0000	46 lines
FW: link to Statistics Commission PSA target report	Macfarlane, Alison	Wed, 2 Nov 2005 14:04:46 -0000	400 lines
Re: How should we present statistics?	Allan Reese (Cefas)	Wed, 2 Nov 2005 13:56:56 -0000	54 lines
Re: How should we present statistics?	Ted Harding	Wed, 2 Nov 2005 12:08:05 -0000	160 lines
Re: How should we present statistics?	Greg Phillpotts	Wed, 2 Nov 2005 09:13:32 +0000	178 lines
How should we present statistics?	John Maslen	Tue, 1 Nov 2005 14:17:55 +0000	94 lines
Job Advert	Vernon Gayle	Tue, 1 Nov 2005 09:10:34 -0000	426 lines
call for contributions	Janet Shapiro	Mon, 31 Oct 2005 17:38:17 -0000	180 lines
Re: US 'Mad Hatter' pollsters -Shame on them.	Paul Spicker	Thu, 27 Oct 2005 09:07:59 +0100	24 lines
US 'Mad Hatter' pollsters -Shame on them.	Alan Truelove	Wed, 26 Oct 2005 21:26:56 +0100	25 lines
Re: Creating a Health & Safety Statistics User Group	Macfarlane, Alison	Wed, 26 Oct 2005 11:54:47 +0100	101 lines
BIA/BMI	Vernon Gayle	Tue, 25 Oct 2005 08:23:54 +0100	295 lines
BIA/BMI	Vernon Gayle	Mon, 24 Oct 2005 19:06:08 +0100	106 lines
Re: Creating a Health & Safety Statistics User Group	Ray Thomas	Mon, 24 Oct 2005 12:35:23 +0100	56 lines
Radio 4 Census programme audio file	Robin Rice	Mon, 24 Oct 2005 11:38:13 +0100	37 lines
FW: Creating a Health & Safety Statistics User Group	Macfarlane, Alison	Mon, 24 Oct 2005 09:11:20 +0100	123 lines
The 25th Anniversary of the Women and Employment Survey	Jane Nolan	Tue, 18 Oct 2005 15:16:25 +0100	49 lines
Health statistics users group email list - message from new listowner	Macfarlane, Alison	Mon, 17 Oct 2005 18:29:05 +0100	148 lines
Re: 'Communities of practice'	John Bibby	Sun, 16 Oct 2005 23:18:57 +0100	146 lines
Information Centre response	Macfarlane, Alison	Thu, 13 Oct 2005 15:29:59 +0100	67 lines
Privatisation of NHS statistics	Macfarlane, Alison	Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:01:17 +0100	67 lines
FW: STATISTICS COMMISSION OPEN MEETING: 16 NOVEMBER 2005	Macfarlane, Alison	Thu, 13 Oct 2005 13:54:25 +0100	561 lines
Eugenics revisited	Alan Truelove	Wed, 12 Oct 2005 21:19:07 +0100	38 lines
Re: 'Communities of practice'	Jeff Evans	Wed, 12 Oct 2005 13:21:43 +0100	89 lines
'Communities of practice'	Macfarlane, Alison	Wed, 12 Oct 2005 09:27:32 +0100	37 lines
Re: Privatisation of NHS community health services and information services	Peter Timusk	Wed, 12 Oct 2005 04:04:29 -0400	143 lines
Privatisation of NHS community health services and information services	Macfarlane, Alison	Wed, 12 Oct 2005 08:46:57 +0100	109 lines
FW: PH and current NHS reorganisation	Macfarlane, Alison	Tue, 11 Oct 2005 10:21:10 +0100	122 lines
Job details	Vernon Gayle	Tue, 27 Sep 2005 15:20:24 +0100	4687 lines
Re: Book Mart @ Hathersage AGM	John Bibby	Tue, 27 Sep 2005 14:46:22 +0100	96 lines
Re: New Scientist	Ted Harding	Tue, 20 Sep 2005 16:29:32 +0100	61 lines
Re: New Scientist on fingerprints	Paul Spicker	Tue, 20 Sep 2005 16:05:44 +0100	29 lines
Re: New Scientist on fingerprints	John Whittington	Tue, 20 Sep 2005 15:35:34 +0100	41 lines
Re: New Scientist on fingerprints	Allan Reese AFH CEFAS	Tue, 20 Sep 2005 15:34:44 +0100	58 lines
Re: New Scientist	John Whittington	Tue, 20 Sep 2005 15:29:40 +0100	44 lines
Re: New Scientist on fingerprints	Paul Spicker	Tue, 20 Sep 2005 10:48:59 +0100	34 lines
New Scientist	John Logsdon	Tue, 20 Sep 2005 05:47:56 +0100	34 lines
New Methods Journall	Malcolm Williams	Mon, 19 Sep 2005 11:41:04 +0100	273 lines
Re: 1 Kg = 0.22 lb Forsooth!	John Bibby	Fri, 16 Sep 2005 19:56:29 +0100	78 lines
Book Mart @ Hathersage AGM	John Bibby	Fri, 16 Sep 2005 19:56:19 +0100	60 lines
1 Kg = 0.22 lb Forsooth!	Ted Harding	Sun, 11 Sep 2005 10:02:12 +0100	40 lines
Re: EDS again	John Logsdon	Fri, 9 Sep 2005 13:57:23 +0100	65 lines
Re: Fw: UK health inequalities - Guardian report	Allan Reese AFH CEFAS	Fri, 9 Sep 2005 12:33:21 +0100	263 lines
Re: Fw: UK health inequalities - Guardian report	Bland, M.	Fri, 9 Sep 2005 12:02:16 +0100	213 lines
Fw: UK health inequalities - Guardian report	Janet Shapiro	Fri, 9 Sep 2005 11:21:05 +0100	153 lines
Re: EDS again	Ursula Huws, Analytica	Thu, 8 Sep 2005 16:53:04 +0100	194 lines
Re: EDS again	John Logsdon	Mon, 5 Sep 2005 06:52:57 +0100	113 lines
New Orleans blog	John Logsdon	Mon, 5 Sep 2005 06:43:33 +0100	49 lines
Fw: Study highlights 'perverse' failures of welfare state	Janet Shapiro	Fri, 2 Sep 2005 11:47:20 +0100	118 lines
Social research in Cuba	Ludi Simpson	Thu, 1 Sep 2005 13:00:40 +0100	43 lines
health stats job	Mary Shaw	Wed, 31 Aug 2005 13:18:26 +0100	38 lines
Re: where have all the young men gone?	Ludi Simpson	Fri, 26 Aug 2005 18:48:18 +0100	23 lines
EDS again	Ted Harding	Thu, 25 Aug 2005 01:25:33 +0100	71 lines
where have all the young men gone?	Ludi Simpson	Wed, 24 Aug 2005 10:20:06 +0100	31 lines
Re: Ian Blair on Crime Statistics	Ursula Huws, Analytica	Tue, 23 Aug 2005 08:36:28 +0100	153 lines
Re: Ian Blair on Crime Statistics	Vicenç Meléndez	Tue, 23 Aug 2005 08:47:11 +0200	280 lines
Re: Ian Blair on Crime Statistics	Macfarlane, Alison	Mon, 22 Aug 2005 16:12:52 +0100	175 lines
Re: Ian Blair on Crime Statistics	Ted Harding	Mon, 22 Aug 2005 13:38:33 +0100	40 lines
Re: Ian Blair on Crime Statistics	Macfarlane, Alison	Mon, 22 Aug 2005 09:47:29 +0100	236 lines
Re: Who has what, and where?	Ted Harding	Mon, 22 Aug 2005 09:25:42 +0100	67 lines
LAST WORDS FROM LEN COOK- THIS THURSDAY	Ray Thomas	Sun, 21 Aug 2005 21:44:25 +0100	47 lines
Who has what, and where?	Ted Harding	Sun, 21 Aug 2005 15:58:04 +0100	112 lines
Radical Statistics Administrator	Janet Shapiro	Sun, 21 Aug 2005 10:51:16 +0100	271 lines
Ian Blair on Crime Statistics	Ted Harding	Sat, 20 Aug 2005 13:59:17 +0100	60 lines
LAST WORDS FROM LEN COOK	Ray Thomas	Thu, 11 Aug 2005 05:44:12 +0100	41 lines
ESSAY COMPETITION 2006	Janet Shapiro	Wed, 10 Aug 2005 11:58:46 +0100	633 lines
Roy Meadow/David Southall	Ted Harding	Tue, 9 Aug 2005 12:46:42 +0100	47 lines
Re: New free statistics resource (fwd)	Ray Thomas	Tue, 2 Aug 2005 12:58:34 +0100	320 lines
Re: Roy Meadow	John Bibby	Mon, 1 Aug 2005 18:28:20 +0100	147 lines
Statistics and Research Ethics Committees	Marchant, Paul	Mon, 1 Aug 2005 13:47:16 +0100	234 lines
announcement of 2006 conference	Janet Shapiro	Mon, 1 Aug 2005 11:45:32 +0100	265 lines
Re: New free statistics resource (fwd)	Stephen Morris	Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:02:00 +0100	208 lines
Re: New free statistics resource (fwd)	Ray Thomas	Fri, 29 Jul 2005 14:45:05 +0100	182 lines
Gordon Brown's secret obstetric activities?	Alison Macfarlane	Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:57:30 +0100	61 lines
Re: Caesareans	Ray Thomas	Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:59:47 +0100	511 lines
Re: Mean vs Median (was: Re: New free statistics resource (fwd))	Allan Reese AFH CEFAS	Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:21:14 +0100	183 lines
Re: Mean vs Median (was: Re: New free statistics resource (fwd))	Stephen Morris	Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:22:20 +0100	166 lines
Mean vs Median (was: Re: New free statistics resource (fwd))	Mike Brewer	Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:41:32 +0100	116 lines
Re: New free statistics resource (fwd)	Stephen Morris	Mon, 25 Jul 2005 13:55:14 +0100	147 lines
Re: Roy Meadow	Macfarlane, Alison	Mon, 25 Jul 2005 13:51:40 +0100	278 lines
volunteers needed to summarise	Janet Shapiro	Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:06:23 +0100	124 lines
Re: Roy Meadow	Bland, M.	Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:38:57 +0100	84 lines
Roy Meadow	Macfarlane, Alison	Mon, 25 Jul 2005 09:56:50 +0100	102 lines
Re: Roy Meadow	John Whittington	Mon, 25 Jul 2005 09:46:57 +0100	98 lines
Re: Roy Meadow	Ray Thomas	Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:00:28 +0100	60 lines
"Freakonomics"	Martin K Parkinson	Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:27:16 +0100	29 lines
Roy Meadow / Lancet Editorial	Ted Harding	Sat, 23 Jul 2005 09:25:03 +0100	33 lines
Re: New free statistics resource (fwd)	Marchant, Paul	Fri, 22 Jul 2005 13:38:08 +0100	115 lines
FW: Publication of Statistics Commission Annual Report	Macfarlane, Alison	Fri, 22 Jul 2005 10:00:36 +0100	134 lines
Re: New free statistics resource on Prof. Meadows	Bilal Barakat	Fri, 22 Jul 2005 09:03:18 +0100	69 lines
New free statistics resource (fwd)	Professor David Gordon	Thu, 21 Jul 2005 18:04:21 +0100	91 lines
FW: Publication of Statistics Commission Annual Report	Macfarlane, Alison	Tue, 19 Jul 2005 19:14:32 +0100	170 lines
Re: Roy Meadow	Marchant, Paul	Tue, 19 Jul 2005 11:29:45 +0100	312 lines
Re: Roy Meadow	John Bibby	Tue, 19 Jul 2005 11:21:39 +0100	293 lines
Re: Roy Meadow	Allan Reese AFH CEFAS	Tue, 19 Jul 2005 10:04:46 +0100	90 lines
Re: Roy Meadow	Ted Harding	Tue, 19 Jul 2005 10:01:43 +0100	75 lines
Re: Roy Meadow	Kevin McConway	Tue, 19 Jul 2005 08:56:33 +0100	60 lines
Re: Roy Meadow	Ted Harding	Mon, 18 Jul 2005 23:35:09 +0100	252 lines
Re: Roy Meadow	Ted Harding	Mon, 18 Jul 2005 23:35:09 +0100	105 lines
Voice from the Fen [2]	Ted Harding	Mon, 18 Jul 2005 23:35:09 +0100	48 lines
Re: Roy Meadow	John Bibby	Mon, 18 Jul 2005 19:18:42 +0100	85 lines
Re: Roy Meadow	Macfarlane, Alison	Mon, 18 Jul 2005 18:44:25 +0100	174 lines
Re: knee-jerk show-trial victim-seeking witch-baiting? RE: "Cot	John Bibby	Mon, 18 Jul 2005 13:39:29 +0100	143 lines
Re: knee-jerk show-trial victim-seeking witch-baiting? RE: "Cot	John Bibby	Mon, 18 Jul 2005 13:39:20 +0100	130 lines
Roy Meadow	Ted Harding	Fri, 15 Jul 2005 22:56:54 +0100	38 lines
Re: Rejected posting: FAO List Manager	Macfarlane, Alison	Fri, 15 Jul 2005 08:56:18 +0100	285 lines
Rejected posting: FAO List Manager	Ted Harding	Thu, 14 Jul 2005 18:37:22 +0100	82 lines
FW: Announcing FIRM - the Foundation for Integrity and Responsib	Ted Harding	Thu, 14 Jul 2005 16:01:31 +0100	110 lines
Amazon.com Listmania List: IQ, Racial diff.,Immig.	Alan Truelove	Wed, 13 Jul 2005 22:22:40 +0100	64 lines
Fw: To Scientists and Engineers against the War: Invitation to Sustainable World Conference	Janet Shapiro	Tue, 5 Jul 2005 15:37:45 +0100	832 lines
Research Associate post at Sheffield	Dimitris Ballas	Tue, 5 Jul 2005 12:19:44 +0100	46 lines
Re: knee-jerk show-trial victim-seeking witch-baiting? RE: "Cot	Allan Reese AFH CEFAS	Tue, 5 Jul 2005 10:06:49 +0100	42 lines
Re: knee-jerk show-trial victim-seeking witch-baiting? RE: "Cot	susan starkings	Tue, 5 Jul 2005 08:30:31 +0000	94 lines
knee-jerk show-trial victim-seeking witch-baiting? RE: "Cot death expert faces disciplinary hearing"	John Bibby	Mon, 4 Jul 2005 17:58:13 +0100	59 lines
FW: Anyone going to G8 mobilisation - Edinburgh and/or Gleneagles ? - or locally	Macfarlane, Alison	Fri, 1 Jul 2005 15:31:28 +0100	133 lines
Voice from the Fen	Ted Harding	Thu, 30 Jun 2005 11:31:54 +0100	60 lines
A puzzle for you	Ted Harding	Wed, 29 Jun 2005 10:43:13 +0100	75 lines
Re: Government and IT	Ursula Huws, Analytica	Sun, 26 Jun 2005 11:46:17 +0100	246 lines
Government and IT	Ted Harding	Sun, 26 Jun 2005 10:33:00 +0100	51 lines
Social Science week blog - controversy welcome!	Robin Rice	Wed, 22 Jun 2005 15:08:59 +0100	57 lines
Re: "Cot death expert faces disciplinary hearing"	Paul Spicker	Wed, 22 Jun 2005 14:32:51 +0100	92 lines
Re: "Cot death expert faces disciplinary hearing"	Ray Thomas	Wed, 22 Jun 2005 13:11:12 +0100	27 lines
Re: "Cot death expert faces disciplinary hearing"	Ted Harding	Wed, 22 Jun 2005 11:45:48 +0100	137 lines
Re: Obstetric Litigation	John Whittington	Wed, 22 Jun 2005 09:43:17 +0100	76 lines
Re: Obstetric Litigation	Ted Harding	Tue, 21 Jun 2005 21:26:06 +0100	42 lines
Re: Obstetric Litigation	John Whittington	Tue, 21 Jun 2005 17:55:11 +0100	165 lines
Re: Obstetric Litigation	Mark Temple	Tue, 21 Jun 2005 16:51:54 +0100	53 lines
Re: Obstetric Litigation	Ted Harding	Tue, 21 Jun 2005 15:17:05 +0100	104 lines
Obstetric Litigation	John Whittington	Tue, 21 Jun 2005 13:35:13 +0100	63 lines
Floods and Joined Up Information	Ted Harding	Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:08:46 +0100	267 lines
Fw: (Fwd) Applied Statistics 2005, call for abstracts	Robin Rice	Mon, 20 Jun 2005 17:50:14 +0100	87 lines
Re: "Cot death expert faces disciplinary hearing"	John Whittington	Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:47:43 +0100	43 lines
"Cot death expert faces disciplinary hearing"	Ted Harding	Mon, 20 Jun 2005 10:35:06 +0100	80 lines
Ph.D. studentship	dave byrne@durham ac uk	Wed, 15 Jun 2005 14:04:57 +0100	41 lines
Request for a speaker	Janet Shapiro	Thu, 2 Jun 2005 14:04:28 +0100	91 lines
Re: market research	Ted Harding	Wed, 1 Jun 2005 18:13:38 +0100	101 lines
Re: market research	Tony Greenfield	Wed, 1 Jun 2005 15:46:08 +0100	58 lines
market research	Robert Moore	Wed, 1 Jun 2005 15:10:07 +0100	37 lines
How is singing to be measured as literacy? was Re: Job Vacancy - UNESCO	Peter T.	Sun, 29 May 2005 18:43:13 -0400	28 lines
Fw: Job Vacancy - UNESCO	Ray Thomas	Sun, 29 May 2005 21:54:54 +0100	71 lines
death and surveys	Stephen McKay	Thu, 26 May 2005 18:20:33 +0100	57 lines
Re: examination smiles	Alan Zaslavsky	Thu, 26 May 2005 13:04:18 -0400	28 lines
Re: examination smiles	Ted Harding	Thu, 26 May 2005 13:32:19 +0100	36 lines
examination smiles	Robert Moore	Thu, 26 May 2005 12:28:22 +0100	36 lines
Courses in Statistics: University of Hertfordshire, June/July 2005	Neil H. Spencer	Wed, 25 May 2005 15:22:34 +0100	184 lines
FW: 2004 'election'	J.Ginn	Mon, 23 May 2005 04:35:00 +0100	181 lines
Re: Caesareans: Gordon Brown? NO! Gucci? YES!!	John Whittington	Fri, 20 May 2005 22:39:39 +0100	60 lines
Caesarean rates by mother's age and parity	Macfarlane, Alison	Fri, 20 May 2005 20:39:20 +0100	373 lines
Caesareans: Gordon Brown? NO! Gucci? YES!!	Ted Harding	Fri, 20 May 2005 20:03:47 +0100	46 lines
UKEIG seminar	Janet Shapiro	Fri, 20 May 2005 15:18:10 +0100	141 lines
Re: GORDON BROWN NOT EXONERATED - or relevant?	John Whittington	Fri, 20 May 2005 09:52:00 +0100	43 lines
Re: GORDON BROWN NOT EXONERATED - or relevant?	Ray Thomas	Thu, 19 May 2005 20:15:05 +0100	83 lines
Re: GORDON BROWN NOT EXONERATED - or relevant?	John Whittington	Thu, 19 May 2005 17:51:02 +0100	46 lines
Re: Maternity statistics	John Whittington	Thu, 19 May 2005 17:47:49 +0100	89 lines
FW: Maternity statistics	Macfarlane, Alison	Thu, 19 May 2005 16:10:19 +0100	382 lines
Re: Maternity statistics	John Whittington	Thu, 19 May 2005 15:08:04 +0100	163 lines
Re: Maternity statistics	Ted Harding	Thu, 19 May 2005 14:38:23 +0100	148 lines
Re: Maternity statistics	John Whittington	Thu, 19 May 2005 12:01:06 +0100	83 lines
Re: Caesareans	John Whittington	Thu, 19 May 2005 10:58:07 +0100	73 lines
Re: Maternity statistics	John Whittington	Thu, 19 May 2005 10:40:05 +0100	70 lines
Re: Maternity statistics	Ted Harding	Thu, 19 May 2005 10:27:35 +0100	72 lines
Caesareans	Macfarlane, Alison	Thu, 19 May 2005 09:29:56 +0100	120 lines
Maternity statistics	Stephen McKay	Thu, 19 May 2005 08:06:58 +0100	47 lines
Re: GORDON BROWN NOT EXONERATED - or relevant?	Ray Thomas	Wed, 18 May 2005 22:05:41 +0100	603 lines
Re: GORDON BROWN NOT EXONERATED - or relevant?	Macfarlane, Alison	Tue, 17 May 2005 14:26:11 +0100	490 lines
Re: nazi spam	K.J.Mcconway	Tue, 17 May 2005 13:42:33 +0100	50 lines
Re: GORDON BROWN NOT EXONERATED - or relevant?	John Whittington	Tue, 17 May 2005 13:27:13 +0100	112 lines
Re: GORDON BROWN NOT EXONERATED - or relevant?	Ray Thomas	Tue, 17 May 2005 12:04:08 +0100	178 lines
Re: nazi spam	Peter T.	Mon, 16 May 2005 13:18:35 -0400	80 lines
Re: nazi spam	Ted Harding	Mon, 16 May 2005 14:30:57 +0100	48 lines
Re: nazi spam	Stephen Morris	Mon, 16 May 2005 14:04:35 +0100	55 lines
JOB ADVERT	Vernon Gayle	Mon, 16 May 2005 13:29:00 +0100	71 lines
nazi spam	Ruth Balogh	Mon, 16 May 2005 13:10:34 +0100	29 lines
JOB ADVERT	Vernon Gayle	Mon, 16 May 2005 12:28:46 +0100	741 lines
Re: GORDON BROWN NOT EXONERATED - or relevant?	John Whittington	Mon, 16 May 2005 11:51:05 +0100	77 lines
Re: GORDON BROWN NOT EXONERATED - or relevant?	Ray Thomas	Mon, 16 May 2005 05:33:39 +0100	496 lines
[EQ] Is Race Real? --A Web Forum Organized by the Social Science Research Council (fwd)	Professor David Gordon	Mon, 9 May 2005 17:47:41 +0100	219 lines
Announ cement	Ludi Simpson	Thu, 5 May 2005 15:21:26 +0100	77 lines
Re: AGM 2006 in Hathersage, near Sheffield	Ray Thomas	Tue, 3 May 2005 16:37:25 +0100	190 lines
AGM 2006 in Hathersage, near Sheffield	<>	Sun, 1 May 2005 03:11:45 EDT	83 lines
Re: JIC report	K.J.Mcconway	Fri, 29 Apr 2005 13:48:06 +0100	200 lines
Re: GORDON BROWN NOT EXONERATED - or relevant?	Ray Thomas	Fri, 29 Apr 2005 13:01:35 +0100	392 lines
JIC report	Tony Greenfield	Fri, 29 Apr 2005 12:27:02 +0100	94 lines
Re: GORDON BROWN NOT EXONERATED - or relevant?	Macfarlane, Alison	Fri, 29 Apr 2005 11:14:30 +0100	236 lines
GORDON BROWN NOT EXONERATED	Ray Thomas	Fri, 29 Apr 2005 10:46:06 +0100	50 lines
Re: Maternity statistics for England published to day	Macfarlane, Alison	Fri, 29 Apr 2005 09:47:57 +0100	425 lines
Re: Maternity statistics for England published to day	John Whittington	Fri, 29 Apr 2005 09:00:53 +0100	63 lines
Re: AGM 2006	Ted Harding	Thu, 28 Apr 2005 23:16:58 +0100	42 lines
Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: AGM 2006	Tony Greenfield	Thu, 28 Apr 2005 22:49:55 +0100	192 lines
Re: AGM 2006/Where is Hathersage	Humphrey Southall	Thu, 28 Apr 2005 22:38:13 +0100	58 lines
Re: AGM 2006	Ruth Balogh	Thu, 28 Apr 2005 21:13:46 +0100	102 lines
Re: Maternity statistics for England published to day	John Whittington	Thu, 28 Apr 2005 15:01:08 +0100	64 lines
Re: Maternity statistics for England published to day	David Symes	Thu, 28 Apr 2005 08:33:30 +0100	122 lines
Re: Maternity statistics for England published to day	Macfarlane, Alison	Wed, 27 Apr 2005 22:53:04 +0100	241 lines
Re: Maternity statistics for England published to day	Ted Harding	Wed, 27 Apr 2005 22:45:11 +0100	49 lines
Re: Maternity statistics for England published to day	Ray Thomas	Wed, 27 Apr 2005 21:33:13 +0100	61 lines
Re: counting voters	John Whittington	Wed, 27 Apr 2005 19:51:04 +0100	58 lines
Re: Voting systems - was Re: counting voters	Quentin L. Burrell	Wed, 27 Apr 2005 19:26:21 +0100	106 lines
Re: Maternity statistics for England published to day	John Whittington	Wed, 27 Apr 2005 18:47:09 +0100	91 lines
Re: Maternity statistics for England published to day	Ted Harding	Wed, 27 Apr 2005 18:05:22 +0100	98 lines
Re: Maternity statistics for England published to day	John Whittington	Wed, 27 Apr 2005 17:04:52 +0100	45 lines
Re: Maternity statistics for England published to day	Macfarlane, Alison	Wed, 27 Apr 2005 16:35:25 +0100	351 lines
Re: Maternity statistics for England published to day	John Whittington	Wed, 27 Apr 2005 16:22:43 +0100	99 lines
Re: Maternity statistics for England published to day	Ray Thomas	Wed, 27 Apr 2005 14:06:44 +0100	106 lines
Voting systems - was Re: counting voters	John Logsdon	Wed, 27 Apr 2005 09:53:33 +0100	108 lines
AGM 2006	Janet Shapiro	Wed, 27 Apr 2005 09:30:54 +0100	78 lines
Re: counting voters	Quentin L. Burrell	Tue, 26 Apr 2005 20:51:49 +0100	46 lines
Re: counting voters[Scanned]	Paul Bivand	Tue, 26 Apr 2005 17:23:49 +0100	101 lines
Re: counting voters	John Whittington	Tue, 26 Apr 2005 15:13:00 +0100	52 lines
Re: counting voters	John Whittington	Tue, 26 Apr 2005 14:32:30 +0100	42 lines
Re: counting voters	David Symes	Tue, 26 Apr 2005 14:01:42 +0100	106 lines
Re: counting voters	John Whittington	Tue, 26 Apr 2005 13:42:21 +0100	50 lines
Re: counting voters	Ted Harding	Tue, 26 Apr 2005 12:54:21 +0100	46 lines
Re: counting voters	David McNulty	Tue, 26 Apr 2005 12:03:40 +0100	132 lines
Re: counting voters	SD McKay	Tue, 26 Apr 2005 11:57:31 +0100	83 lines
Re: counting voters	John Whittington	Tue, 26 Apr 2005 11:43:54 +0100	46 lines
Re: counting voters	Malcolm Williams	Tue, 26 Apr 2005 11:39:50 +0100	88 lines
Re: counting voters	John Whittington	Tue, 26 Apr 2005 11:16:05 +0100	54 lines
counting voters	Ruth Balogh	Tue, 26 Apr 2005 09:16:33 +0100	37 lines
Re: "rich pickings indeed for statisticians"	John Logsdon	Fri, 22 Apr 2005 22:24:47 +0100	363 lines
Re: "rich pickings indeed for statisticians"	Ray Thomas	Fri, 22 Apr 2005 20:26:37 +0100	36 lines
Re: "rich pickings indeed for statisticians"	Isaac Dialsingh	Fri, 22 Apr 2005 15:15:18 -0400	273 lines
Queries on EU-SILC sampling method	jay ginn	Thu, 21 Apr 2005 09:05:59 +0100	588 lines
IASSIST/IFDO Conference announcement, 24-27 May 2005,Edinburgh, Scotland	Robin Rice	Wed, 20 Apr 2005 18:17:58 +0100	66 lines
Re: "rich pickings indeed for statisticians"	John Logsdon	Tue, 19 Apr 2005 19:59:08 +0100	223 lines
"rich pickings indeed for statisticians"	Ray Thomas	Tue, 19 Apr 2005 12:06:55 +0100	162 lines
Re: MG Rover Over	John Logsdon	Tue, 19 Apr 2005 09:39:54 +0100	104 lines
Announcement forwarded from Politics of health list	Macfarlane, Alison	Tue, 19 Apr 2005 08:44:41 +0100	403 lines
Re: MG Rover Over	Ray Thomas	Mon, 18 Apr 2005 23:41:06 +0100	54 lines
Re: MG Rover Over	K.J.Mcconway	Mon, 18 Apr 2005 15:58:36 +0100	63 lines
Re: MG Rover Over	John Logsdon	Mon, 18 Apr 2005 15:39:15 +0100	97 lines
Re: MG Rover Over	K.J.Mcconway	Mon, 18 Apr 2005 12:08:16 +0100	74 lines
Courses in Statistics: University of Hertfordshire, June/July 2005	Neil H Spencer	Mon, 18 Apr 2005 07:23:04 +0100	88 lines
Re: MG Rover Over	John Logsdon	Sun, 17 Apr 2005 21:22:51 +0100	182 lines
Re: MG Rover Over	alan truelove	Sun, 17 Apr 2005 15:09:40 -0400	53 lines
Re: MG Rover Over	John Logsdon	Sun, 17 Apr 2005 18:16:41 +0100	168 lines
Re: MG Rover Over	Ray Thomas	Sat, 16 Apr 2005 21:20:03 +0100	77 lines
Re: MG Rover Over	John Logsdon	Sat, 16 Apr 2005 17:26:31 +0100	124 lines
MG Rover Over	John Logsdon	Sat, 16 Apr 2005 16:20:09 +0100	99 lines
Re: EU-SILC - concerns[Scanned]	jay ginn	Fri, 15 Apr 2005 00:06:34 +0100	1005 lines
Re: EU-SILC - concerns[Scanned]	Paul Bivand	Thu, 14 Apr 2005 10:12:21 +0100	549 lines
Re: Child Support Agency	David Symes	Wed, 13 Apr 2005 18:53:03 +0100	273 lines
Re: Child Support Agency	Stephen Morris	Wed, 13 Apr 2005 14:04:09 +0100	166 lines
Re: Child Support Agency	John Logsdon	Wed, 13 Apr 2005 12:35:37 +0100	125 lines
Re: Discussion on Maternity Statistics	John Whittington	Wed, 13 Apr 2005 11:42:47 +0100	54 lines
Re: Child Support Agency	Ted Harding	Wed, 13 Apr 2005 11:28:08 +0100	55 lines
Re: Child Support Agency	Stephen McKay	Wed, 13 Apr 2005 09:33:49 +0100	188 lines
Re: Child Support Agency	Ted Harding	Tue, 12 Apr 2005 21:40:19 +0100	88 lines
Re: Child Support Agency	Mike Brewer	Tue, 12 Apr 2005 21:30:47 +0100	127 lines
Re: Discussion on Maternity Statistics	Ray Thomas	Tue, 12 Apr 2005 20:38:11 +0100	91 lines
Child Support Agency	Ted Harding	Tue, 12 Apr 2005 20:00:25 +0100	86 lines
FW: ESRC CASE PhD Studentship - Department of Geography, Universi ty of Sheffield	Macfarlane, Alison	Tue, 12 Apr 2005 17:59:39 +0100	294 lines
WHITE ROSE RESEARCH STUDENTSHIPS	Dimitris Ballas	Tue, 12 Apr 2005 16:20:42 +0100	131 lines
Re: Discussion on Maternity Statistics	D.Price	Tue, 12 Apr 2005 15:01:09 +0100	652 lines
Re: Discussion on Maternity Statistics	John Whittington	Tue, 12 Apr 2005 11:17:48 +0100	65 lines
Re: Discussion on Maternity Statistics	Macfarlane, Alison	Tue, 12 Apr 2005 10:29:38 +0100	260 lines
FW: EU-SILC - concerns	jay ginn	Tue, 12 Apr 2005 10:10:13 +0100	448 lines
Re: Discussion on Maternity Statistics	Penelope Mullen	Tue, 12 Apr 2005 09:28:32 +0100	45 lines
Re: discussion	Humphrey Southall	Tue, 12 Apr 2005 08:58:01 +0100	53 lines
discussion	Ruth Balogh	Mon, 11 Apr 2005 21:29:35 +0100	26 lines
Re: Discussion on Maternity Statistics	Macfarlane, Alison	Mon, 11 Apr 2005 18:51:52 +0100	215 lines
Re: Discussion on Maternity Statistics	Ray Thomas	Mon, 11 Apr 2005 12:58:07 +0100	44 lines
Re: Discussion on Maternity Statistics	John Whittington	Sun, 10 Apr 2005 00:30:54 +0100	44 lines
Re: Discussion on Maternity Statistics	Mark Temple	Sat, 9 Apr 2005 23:10:35 +0100	155 lines
Fwd: Consultation on UK Immigration Statistics	Humphrey Southall	Fri, 8 Apr 2005 16:46:51 +0100	65 lines
Announce: Rural Disadvantage Study	Allan Reese AFH CEFAS	Fri, 8 Apr 2005 16:01:12 +0100	46 lines
Re: CONFIDENCE IN OFFICIAL STATISTICS	Ray Thomas	Fri, 8 Apr 2005 13:16:00 +0100	86 lines
Re: An Independent Government Statistical Service[Scanned]	Paul Bivand	Fri, 8 Apr 2005 12:29:16 +0100	139 lines
An Independent Government Statistical Service	Ray Thomas	Fri, 8 Apr 2005 12:08:19 +0100	56 lines
Re: Discussion on Maternity Statistics	John Whittington	Fri, 8 Apr 2005 11:41:29 +0100	48 lines
Re: Discussion on Maternity Statistics	D.Price	Fri, 8 Apr 2005 10:34:38 +0100	230 lines
Re: Discussion on Maternity Statistics	Ray Thomas	Fri, 8 Apr 2005 09:54:20 +0100	51 lines
Re: Discussion on Maternity Statistics	Ted Harding	Thu, 7 Apr 2005 19:23:29 +0100	62 lines
Re: Discussion on Maternity Statistics	Janet Shapiro	Thu, 7 Apr 2005 18:47:37 +0100	78 lines
Discussion on Maternity Statistics	John Whittington	Wed, 6 Apr 2005 12:29:35 +0100	51 lines
Re: Maternity statistics for England published to day	John Whittington	Wed, 6 Apr 2005 11:47:29 +0100	115 lines
Re: Maternity statistics for England published to day	David Symes	Wed, 6 Apr 2005 08:42:40 +0100	700 lines
Re: Maternity statistics for England published to day	John Whittington	Wed, 6 Apr 2005 00:23:24 +0100	104 lines
Re: Maternity statistics for England published to day	Ray Thomas	Tue, 5 Apr 2005 22:51:06 +0100	127 lines
public meeting	Ursula Huws	Tue, 5 Apr 2005 18:07:19 +0100	57 lines
Re: Maternity statistics for England published to day	John Whittington	Tue, 5 Apr 2005 14:08:03 +0100	76 lines
Re: Maternity statistics for England published to day	John Whittington	Tue, 5 Apr 2005 12:33:33 +0100	47 lines
Re: Maternity statistics for England published to day	John Whittington	Tue, 5 Apr 2005 12:23:25 +0100	92 lines
Re: Maternity statistics for England published to day	Macfarlane, Alison	Tue, 5 Apr 2005 10:42:48 +0100	189 lines
Re: Maternity statistics for England published to day	Ted Harding	Tue, 5 Apr 2005 10:12:04 +0100	43 lines
Re: Maternity statistics for England published to day	Macfarlane, Alison	Tue, 5 Apr 2005 09:53:19 +0100	171 lines
Re: Maternity statistics for England published to day	Ted Harding	Tue, 5 Apr 2005 01:06:49 +0100	42 lines
Re: Maternity statistics for England published to day	Ray Thomas	Mon, 4 Apr 2005 23:46:09 +0100	147 lines
Re: Maternity statistics for England published to day	Janet Shapiro	Mon, 4 Apr 2005 18:00:14 +0100	289 lines
Re: Maternity statistics for England published to day	John Whittington	Mon, 4 Apr 2005 15:37:17 +0100	110 lines
Re: Maternity statistics for England published to day	Macfarlane, Alison	Mon, 4 Apr 2005 13:48:25 +0100	182 lines
Re: Maternity statistics for England published to day	John Whittington	Mon, 4 Apr 2005 13:23:25 +0100	100 lines
Re: Maternity statistics for England published to day	John Whittington	Mon, 4 Apr 2005 12:00:20 +0100	4000 lines
Re: Maternity statistics for England published to day	Ray Thomas	Sat, 2 Apr 2005 07:16:53 +0100	95 lines
Re: Maternity statistics for England published to day	Mark Temple	Sat, 2 Apr 2005 00:38:37 +0100	85 lines
Re: Maternity statistics for England published to day	Isaac Dialsingh	Fri, 1 Apr 2005 19:11:27 -0400	342 lines
Re: Maternity statistics for England published to day	Macfarlane, Alison	Fri, 1 Apr 2005 16:21:52 +0100	236 lines
Re: Maternity statistics for England published to day	Macfarlane, Alison	Fri, 1 Apr 2005 16:20:19 +0100	41434 lines
Re: Maternity statistics for England published to day	John Whittington	Fri, 1 Apr 2005 14:03:42 +0100	97 lines
Re: Maternity statistics for England published to day	John Whittington	Fri, 1 Apr 2005 13:17:14 +0100	64 lines
Re: Maternity statistics for England published to day	John Whittington	Fri, 1 Apr 2005 12:51:57 +0100	104 lines
Re: Productivity and growth	Monastiriotis,V	Fri, 1 Apr 2005 11:10:40 +0100	106 lines
Re: Productivity and growth	Humphrey Southall	Fri, 1 Apr 2005 11:05:56 +0100	82 lines
Re: Productivity and growth	Ray Thomas	Fri, 1 Apr 2005 10:37:30 +0100	49 lines
Re: Maternity statistics for England published to day	Macfarlane, Alison	Fri, 1 Apr 2005 09:33:09 +0100	359 lines
Re: Maternity statistics for England published to day	Ray Thomas	Thu, 31 Mar 2005 21:01:10 +0100	65 lines
Re: Maternity statistics for England published to day	Ted Harding	Thu, 31 Mar 2005 19:05:47 +0100	95 lines
Re: Maternity statistics for England published to day	John Whittington	Thu, 31 Mar 2005 14:31:59 +0100	81 lines
Re: Maternity statistics for England published to day	Macfarlane, Alison	Thu, 31 Mar 2005 12:51:28 +0100	226 lines
Re: Productivity and growth[Scanned]	John Whittington	Thu, 31 Mar 2005 11:52:55 +0100	46 lines
Re: Maternity statistics for England published to day	John Whittington	Thu, 31 Mar 2005 11:43:03 +0100	96 lines
Re: Maternity statistics for England published to day	Helm, Ruth H	Thu, 31 Mar 2005 11:07:32 +0100	469 lines
Re: Productivity and growth	Ted Harding	Thu, 31 Mar 2005 09:45:41 -0000	55 lines
Maternity statistics for England published to day	Macfarlane, Alison	Thu, 31 Mar 2005 10:28:36 +0100	385 lines
Re: Productivity and growth[Scanned]	Paul Bivand	Thu, 31 Mar 2005 10:24:11 +0100	114 lines
Re: Productivity and growth	John Whittington	Wed, 30 Mar 2005 18:20:35 +0100	60 lines
Re: Productivity and growth	John Logsdon	Wed, 30 Mar 2005 08:36:41 +0100	81 lines
Re: Productivity and growth	Ray Thomas	Tue, 29 Mar 2005 22:12:50 +0100	40 lines
Re: Productivity and growth	Ursula Huws	Thu, 24 Mar 2005 18:53:33 +0000	92 lines
Re: Productivity and growth	Ray Thomas	Thu, 24 Mar 2005 18:35:05 -0000	43 lines
Re: Growth and productivity	Andrew Philpott Morgan	Wed, 23 Mar 2005 20:52:01 +0100	44 lines
Re: Productivity and growth	Ursula Huws	Wed, 23 Mar 2005 12:36:26 +0000	182 lines
Re: Productivity and growth	K.J.Mcconway	Wed, 23 Mar 2005 11:38:47 -0000	117 lines
Re: Productivity and growth	Ray Thomas	Wed, 23 Mar 2005 11:26:23 -0000	53 lines
Re: Productivity and growth	John Logsdon	Wed, 23 Mar 2005 10:34:13 +0000	194 lines
Re: Productivity and growth	Kevin McConway	Wed, 23 Mar 2005 00:17:59 +0000	121 lines
Productivity and growth	John Logsdon	Tue, 22 Mar 2005 22:06:20 +0000	60 lines
FW: RSS Official Statistics section meeting on use of routine dat a to monitor access to health care	Macfarlane, Alison	Thu, 17 Mar 2005 09:29:36 -0000	127 lines
Re: CONFIDENCE IN OFFICIAL STATISTICS	Paul Spicker	Sun, 13 Mar 2005 11:38:54 -0000	55 lines
Re: CONFIDENCE IN OFFICIAL STATISTICS	Ray Thomas	Sat, 12 Mar 2005 23:52:59 -0000	820 lines
GENES, POPULATIONS AND DISEASE - meeting 17th May	Gilthorpe, Mark S	Fri, 11 Mar 2005 12:41:31 -0000	81 lines
Re: CONFIDENCE IN OFFICIAL STATISTICS	Macfarlane, Alison	Fri, 11 Mar 2005 09:35:00 -0000	659 lines
Fw: CONFIDENCE IN OFFICIAL STATISTICS	Ray Thomas	Fri, 11 Mar 2005 08:08:48 -0000	226 lines
Re: Fw: PUBLIC CONFIDENCE IN BRITISH OFFICIAL STATISTICS	Ray Thomas	Thu, 10 Mar 2005 12:45:12 -0000	68 lines
Re: Fw: PUBLIC CONFIDENCE IN BRITISH OFFICIAL STATISTICS	Simon Briscoe	Thu, 10 Mar 2005 10:57:02 +0000	120 lines
Re: Quangos ...	Ted Harding	Wed, 9 Mar 2005 19:33:26 -0000	64 lines
Re: Quangos ...	Humphrey Southall	Wed, 9 Mar 2005 18:48:45 +0000	48 lines
Re: Numerology and terrorism	Ted Harding	Wed, 9 Mar 2005 16:32:39 -0000	54 lines
Quangos ...	Ted Harding	Wed, 9 Mar 2005 16:28:42 -0000	99 lines
FW: Recent Statistics from Israel	Paul Spicker	Wed, 9 Mar 2005 14:46:36 -0000	600 lines
Re: Numerology and terrorism	John Whittington	Wed, 9 Mar 2005 13:16:08 +0000	46 lines
Re: Fw: PUBLIC CONFIDENCE IN BRITISH OFFICIAL STATISTICS	Macfarlane, Alison	Wed, 9 Mar 2005 13:03:51 -0000	236 lines
Numerology and terrorism	John Logsdon	Wed, 9 Mar 2005 12:52:49 +0000	35 lines
Re: Fw: PUBLIC CONFIDENCE IN BRITISH OFFICIAL STATISTICS	Wells, Julian	Wed, 9 Mar 2005 12:29:24 -0000	76 lines
Fw: CONFIDENCE IN OFFICIAL STATISTICS	Ray Thomas	Tue, 8 Mar 2005 12:55:23 -0000	48 lines
COURSE: SAS Programming: 14th April, University of Hertfordshire	Neil H Spencer	Tue, 8 Mar 2005 12:28:22 -0000	85 lines
COURSE: Statistical Software 'R': 13th April, University of Hertfordshire	Neil H Spencer	Tue, 8 Mar 2005 12:28:20 -0000	79 lines
COURSE: Design and Analysis of Experiments: 12th April, University of Hertfordshire	Neil H Spencer	Tue, 8 Mar 2005 12:27:57 -0000	101 lines
Re: MRSA	Ted Harding	Tue, 8 Mar 2005 10:00:53 -0000	116 lines
Re: MRSA[Scanned]	Paul Bivand	Mon, 7 Mar 2005 13:28:30 -0000	137 lines
Re: MRSA	Ted Harding	Mon, 7 Mar 2005 13:16:45 -0000	92 lines
Fw: CONFIDENCE IN OFFICIAL STATISTICS	Ray Thomas	Mon, 7 Mar 2005 12:14:46 -0000	68 lines
Re: MRSA	Rupert Suckling	Mon, 7 Mar 2005 12:10:33 +0000	118 lines
Re: MRSA	Ted Harding	Mon, 7 Mar 2005 11:57:06 -0000	52 lines
Re: MRSA	Macfarlane, Alison	Mon, 7 Mar 2005 11:41:39 -0000	229 lines
FW: The Lancet - Neonatal Survival Series	Macfarlane, Alison	Mon, 7 Mar 2005 09:20:22 -0000	273 lines
MRSA	Ted Harding	Mon, 7 Mar 2005 08:18:59 -0000	56 lines
FW: Threshold Fears and Unanswered Questions about 9/11	jay ginn	Sun, 6 Mar 2005 18:42:01 -0000	522 lines
Re: PUBLIC CONFIDENCE IN BRITISH OFFICIAL STATISTICS[Scanned]	Paul Bivand	Fri, 4 Mar 2005 10:07:12 -0000	226 lines
Re: PUBLIC CONFIDENCE IN BRITISH OFFICIAL STATISTICS	Ray Thomas	Fri, 4 Mar 2005 10:02:09 -0000	514 lines
Re: Complete US Exit Poll Data Confirms Net Suspicions	Alan Zaslavsky	Thu, 3 Mar 2005 16:06:32 -0500	27 lines
Re: Complete US Exit Poll Data Confirms Net Suspicions	Robin Rice	Thu, 3 Mar 2005 17:46:26 -0000	171 lines
Re: PUBLIC CONFIDENCE IN BRITISH OFFICIAL STATISTICS	Macfarlane, Alison	Thu, 3 Mar 2005 16:25:37 -0000	333 lines
Fw: PUBLIC CONFIDENCE IN BRITISH OFFICIAL STATISTICS	Ray Thomas	Thu, 3 Mar 2005 14:58:37 -0000	97 lines
Fw: PUBLIC CONFIDENCE IN BRITISH OFFICIAL STATISTICS	Ray Thomas	Thu, 3 Mar 2005 11:44:59 -0000	65 lines
PUBLIC CONFIDENCE IN BRITISH OFFICIAL STATISTICS	Ray Thomas	Thu, 3 Mar 2005 10:44:52 -0000	46 lines
Re: Complete US Exit Poll Data Confirms Net Suspicions	Ray Thomas	Thu, 3 Mar 2005 09:28:26 -0000	1275 lines
Short course on missing data	Mary Shaw	Wed, 2 Mar 2005 12:29:49 -0000	62 lines
ESRC LONGITUDINAL DATA ANALYSIS IN THE SOCIAL SCIENCES	Vernon Gayle	Wed, 2 Mar 2005 10:55:04 -0000	314 lines
FW: Complete US Exit Poll Data Confirms Net Suspicions	jay ginn	Wed, 2 Mar 2005 10:52:43 -0000	1228 lines
further info for those attending the conference / AGM	Robin Rice	Thu, 24 Feb 2005 20:10:21 +0000	62 lines
Re: Good bye NHS statistics - hello 'market intelligence'?	Ted Harding	Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:57:36 -0000	55 lines
Good bye NHS statistics - hello 'market intelligence'?	Macfarlane, Alison	Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:57:53 -0000	286 lines
CFC: Retaining and re-using official statistics	Humphrey Southall	Tue, 22 Feb 2005 20:27:14 +0000	95 lines
Radical Statistics Conf: Global Poverty and Inequality, Manchester Sat 26 Feb.	Robin Rice	Fri, 18 Feb 2005 16:55:44 -0000	102 lines
FW: Final call for Free DVD on 9/11!	jay ginn	Fri, 18 Feb 2005 12:02:01 -0000	41 lines
Job opportunity - Research Assistant (quantitative) for Inclusion	Paul Bivand	Thu, 17 Feb 2005 18:07:40 -0000	76 lines
MEETING: 17 May - Genes, populations & disease: genomic, proteomic & metabonomic approaches in epidemiology	Gilthorpe, Mark S	Mon, 14 Feb 2005 08:29:27 -0000	75 lines
FW: Symposium on Confidentiality and Privacy	Macfarlane, Alison	Fri, 11 Feb 2005 10:27:57 -0000	255 lines
ESRC Workshop/Seminar Longitudinal Data Analysis in the Social Sciences	Vernon Gayle	Wed, 9 Feb 2005 13:44:52 -0000	343 lines
Re: FOI - it actually works	Robert Moore	Wed, 2 Feb 2005 11:35:17 +0000	131 lines
FOI - it actually works	Mike Brewer	Tue, 1 Feb 2005 15:16:01 -0000	87 lines
[Fwd: [EQ] Genes, Race, and Psychology in the Genome Era]	Dave Gordon	Mon, 31 Jan 2005 19:07:44 +0000	167 lines
Re: FW: [spiritof1848] Why was study of Iragi civilian deaths ig	Ted Harding	Fri, 28 Jan 2005 10:25:24 -0000	49 lines
FW: [spiritof1848] Why was study of Iragi civilian deaths ignored ?	Macfarlane, Alison	Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:40:35 -0000	1067 lines
Geographical Simulation explained	Dimitris Ballas	Thu, 27 Jan 2005 19:11:53 -0000	498 lines
COURSE: Design and Analysis of Experiments: 12th April, University of Hertfordshire	Neil H Spencer	Fri, 21 Jan 2005 15:59:12 -0000	101 lines
COURSE: Statistical Software 'R': 13th April, University of Hertfordshire	Neil H Spencer	Fri, 21 Jan 2005 15:59:12 -0000	80 lines
COURSE: SAS Programming: 14th April, University of Hertfordshire	Neil H Spencer	Fri, 21 Jan 2005 15:59:12 -0000	86 lines
Re: Government data (quietly) dropped[Scanned]	Simon Briscoe	Wed, 19 Jan 2005 19:56:33 +0000	139 lines
Re: Government data (quietly) dropped[Scanned]	Paul Bivand	Wed, 19 Jan 2005 19:43:54 -0000	95 lines
Government data (quietly) dropped	Simon Briscoe	Wed, 19 Jan 2005 19:00:11 +0000	35 lines
RSAIBIS 2005 - FINAL CALL FOR PAPERS	Dimitris Ballas	Tue, 18 Jan 2005 15:48:06 -0000	62 lines
Meeting of Social Statistics section of RSS	Anthony Fielding	Tue, 18 Jan 2005 12:54:01 +0000	58 lines
SEX AND STATISTICS	Ray Thomas	Mon, 17 Jan 2005 17:25:13 -0000	34 lines
Re: WHERE IS REALITY?[Scanned]	Paul Bivand	Mon, 17 Jan 2005 10:08:06 -0000	133 lines
Re: WHERE IS REALITY?	Ray Thomas	Sat, 15 Jan 2005 10:45:18 -0000	55 lines
Re: WHERE IS REALITY?	Allan Reese FM CEFAS	Fri, 14 Jan 2005 09:55:10 -0000	48 lines
Re: WHERE IS REALITY?	Paul Bivand	Fri, 14 Jan 2005 00:01:11 +0000	146 lines
WHERE IS REALITY?	Ray Thomas	Thu, 13 Jan 2005 22:41:28 -0000	73 lines
Posters for 2005 Conference	Janet Shapiro	Mon, 10 Jan 2005 19:03:20 -0000	77 lines
Re: BBC repeat Where have all the young men gone?	Cope Rob	Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:48:15 -0000	125 lines
Re: BBC repeat Where have all the young men gone?	Janet Shapiro	Thu, 6 Jan 2005 09:37:36 -0000	94 lines
Re: BBC repeat Where have all the young men gone?	John Pritchard	Wed, 5 Jan 2005 16:07:12 -0000	101 lines
Re: BBC repeat Where have all the young men gone?	Cope Rob	Wed, 5 Jan 2005 15:09:57 -0000	66 lines

RADSTATS Archives

2005

Options

Subject

From

Date

Size

JiscMail Tools

RSS Feeds and Sharing

Search Archives

Archives