JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN Archives

PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN  March 2007

PHD-DESIGN March 2007

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: wicked problems

From:

"Dr. Lauchlan A. K. Mackinnon" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Dr. Lauchlan A. K. Mackinnon

Date:

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 07:11:33 +1000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (85 lines)

David,

There is a lot to reply to here, so this will be a short note.

1. From my point of view your description below conflates what I would call
convergent / divergent *problems* with convergent / divergent *thinking*.
Both convergent and divergent thinking may be deployed in relation to
convergent problems - but convergent problems may not require divergent
thinking. A well formed algebra problem for example could be solved by
applying algebra methods taught at school.
2. rather than looking at things in terms of convergent and divergent
problems, I'd typically look at things in terms of the Wallas stage model of
creative illumination, where a 'problem' is worked on using whatever methods
and this may lead to a 'solution'. However, many 'problems' hold out against
this sustained effort, and on the one hand an ever increasing range of
creative approaches are used and on the other the 'problem' begins to be
internalised into the subconscious and churns around in an 'incubation'
phase there. Eventually, something clicks on a subconscious level and an
illumination insight breaks through (often dramatically) into conscious
awareness.
3. in the above model, thereis typically a stage of 'problem finding' where
an initially vague and ill-defined investigation may be progressively
redefined as progressively more explicit and well defined 'problem
situations'.
4. this progression may involve redfining the context (underlying 'paradigm'
or mindset) in which the problem is understood (this is well defined in the
Wertheimer model).

With the above in mind, I'd view convergent *problems* as those that are
readily solved using relatively conventional tools and may have relatively
straightforward and well-defined 'right' answers, and divergent *problems*
as those that require more creative thinking and may afford a wide range of
'correct' answers.

This is my best answer for a few minutes before I dash off to work, anyway!
I may change my position later. ;)

Regards

Lauchlan Mackinnon

Hi Lauchlan,

I am very conversant with the literature, it has been an interest for
many years.  The two links you provide support my point.  These are
about creative thinking, not about the nature of the problem.  Given
that these are modes of thinking, I still cannot see how you map
these onto the nature of the problem.  Your characterisation of these
bipolar modes of thinking seems to match one style of thinking to a
particular style of problem.  This is hardly ever so. Guildford,
Hudson [and many since] recognised that both modes of thinking must
be employed in any non trivial problem solving exercise. If divergent
thinking is about the production of lots of ideas (that we respect
equally blah blah), what then is a divergent problem?  One that
produces many solutions? If so, I suspect a bit of convergency is
required to come to a single answer that a designer's client can
use!  This then contradicts your assertion that divergency of thought
is required to crack a 'divergent' problem.  You also seem to equate
convergency with ordinary thinking, and divergency with creative
original thought (a dangerous game!).  I suggest that, for example,
much work in science and technology has emerged from strongly
convergent thought, mixed perhaps with a bit of divergency and some
intuition at the right points.  Both are needed.  One could perhaps
say that certain occupational groups lead with one mode rather than
the other, and in this sense [art and] designers may be seen to be
more divergent than say engineering designers.  This is borne out in
personality type profiles.

In any case, I have often felt that a lot of what designers do (in an
art and design context rather than a technology context) is
characterised more by opportunity-seeking than by problem-solving.

David

________________________________________________________________________
______

David Durling FDRS • Professor of Design • School of Arts &
Education, Middlesex University,
Cat Hill, Barnet, Hertfordshire, EN4 8HT, UK • tel: 020 8411 5108 (24
hour answering machine)
international:  + 44 20 8411 5108  •  email:  [log in to unmask]  •
email:  [log in to unmask]
web: http://www.dartevents.net   http://www.durling.co.uk

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager