Rachel,
This seems specific to the education community. As such, shouldn't it go in
it's own schema, as Eric has created? I am confused why we would want to
put this in the terms namespace?
Regards,
Harry
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Miller [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 10:15 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: FW: DCMI Schemas
>
>
> At 09:28 AM 8/20/2001 -0700, Stuart Sutton wrote:
> >Rachel, here's the DC-Ed post (cross-posted to DC-General)
> with the results
> >of the Usage Committee's May deliberations on the DC-Ed proposal. It
> >contains the exact semantics as approved.
> >
> >http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/wa.exe?A2=ind0106&L=dc-educ
ation&F=&S=&P=5
>4
>
>I agree that the results of these DCMI recommendations should appear in the
>terms schema.
>
>Stuart
Hi Stuart,
Thanks for the very clear and explicit proposal. From this work, it was
very easy to create a more formal representation of this work that may be
useful for the registry.
http://www.w3.org/2001/08/20-dcmi/ed
--eric
ps: The following may also be of interest to some of you as it provides an
additional means of navigating through these RDF schemas:
http://www.daml.org/cgi-bin/hyperdaml?http://www.w3.org/2001/08/20-dcmi/ed
Playing around with this, I quickly see the new purl redirection in place so
http://www.daml.org/cgi-bin/hyperdaml?http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ now
works :)
|