Dear All,
Excellent Query!
As I understood the terms DESIGN cannot be bounded within the certain
boundaries of any proper definition. What I understood - Design is
something, which exists everywhere, and its “Own Form” is like – ether
particles in universe (i.e. available everywhere without a single
exception) wherever we try to Think Critically and/or Examine Critically in
any are of subject specialization, ranging from linguistics to social
sciences to natural sciences to engineering to architecture to medical
science to fine arts. And as non of us had studied such a vast range of
subjects with “Equal Knowledge Proficiency” – so, how may this feasible to
reach at a commonly accepted definition?
So, I think – “Ability of Critically Think, Analyze and Solve” is DESIGN!!
*Best Regards,*
*Santosh Kumar Jha. *संतोष कुमार झा
*PhD Scholar(Crafts&Design). MBA. MA. MEPPG-IICD. UGC-NET*
*___ _ **___ _ **___ _ **___ _ **___ _ **___ _ **___ _ **___ _ **___ _ **___
_*
*Senior Faculty. School of Fashion Leather Accessories Design*
*Footwear Design & Development Institute. Government of India*
*(An Institute of National Importance, under FDDI Act '2017)*
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 7:20 PM, Graham Dove <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
> I am a long term lurker on the list, often amused and/or annoyed by the
> recurring repetition of particular arguments about which vision and/or
> definition and/or demarcation of "design" is definitive and/or canonical -
> typically just a thinly veiled cover for self-aggrandizing. I rarely feel
> the need to jump into a conversation that my lack of heavy weight tenure
> makes me unqualified to enter on an equal footing, but just a quick note
> here.....
>
> The subheading of the article in the NY Times is "The sale of Dries Van
> Noten to Puig raises some pretty big questions about the current fashion
> system and whether bigger is always better." Personally I didn't find it
> that surprising that in the context of this article the designers in
> question were fashion designers.
>
> Can I make a suggestion please? That when looking to promote our programs
> or update the list on our latest impressive activities, it might be nice
> just to do so openly and directly rather than attach it to a straw man
> argument. I'm not sure writers have the same existential angst about what
> writing is and whether it should be renamed because someone took a
> photograph of a haiku poet, and labelled it "writer in practice" thereby
> not representing those who make a living writing technical manuals (and to
> be honest if they do then that is pretty depressing also). Maybe we would
> be better off celebrating the diversity of practice, and taking the things
> we find useful from wherever we find them, and continue making our own
> arguments for value wherever we can (however frustrating it might be not to
> have that value immediately recognised).
>
>
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> PhD-Design mailing list <[log in to unmask]>
> Discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design
> Subscribe or Unsubscribe at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/phd-design
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------
PhD-Design mailing list <[log in to unmask]>
Discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design
Subscribe or Unsubscribe at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/phd-design
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|