I wonder if it's time to change the format of the Case Studies we have just received. I find the template format rather dull and uninspiring. Sometimes I am not even sure what the project was about. It is rather mechanistic in approach and I do not feel the originator's spirit, enthusiasm, passion and enjoyment comes through. Could a more open ended approach allow contributors to be more creative and engaging. Perhaps a two page spread with freedom of presentation and content. At least they would not all look the same! I got through three this time and gave up as I felt I was getting nothing from the studies in terms of enlightenment or learning.
What do others feel about this?
The case studies are a big investment for GEM and contributors. Could we do it better?
Allan
Focused Learning and Interpretation
Sent from my iPad
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
GEM list: Contact the list owner for assistance at [log in to unmask]
For information about joining, leaving and suspending mail (eg during a holiday) see the list website at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=GEM
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
|