Dear Don and all
Thank you very much for your comment. I feel very much honored.
In a sense, I think knowledge silo is inevitable given the vast growth of
knowledge production in recent years (hard to catch up). We can be better,
but I understand challenges we face.
My intention of making this animation was to communicate the important
knowledge to wider audience. As Don pointed out, I did not produce new
knowledge, but tried my best to communicate it better. I am very glad to
hear that I did not misrepresent some of important knowledge.
I had the privilege of reading, listening, discussing with many great
system safety thinkers; Jens Rasmussen, James Reason, Erik Hollnagel,
Richard Cook, Sidney Dekker, of course Don's work as well. ^^
Dear all
Some additional references would be very helpful for future, but I really
hope to think that it is time for action, not for further discussion.
Please use your power and connections to share this animation to wider
audience. Whatever we do, accidents will continue to happen, but hopefully
less frequently and less severely.
English: https://vimeo.com/122851457
Great to have Don's comment here
Korean: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7854ys6VDW0
Youtube is a more accessible platform in South Korea
Many thanks
Thomas
On 13 July 2015 at 01:51, Don Norman <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I find the discussion of Thomas Jun's excellent video amusing.
>
> It illustrates the standard story that one discipline has no idea what
> other disciplines do.
>
> The field of human factors, of safety engineering, and especially
> cognitive engineering has been studying these issues for many decades,
> making precisely the points made by the video.
>
> The video is excellent -- and making a video is a major contribution.
>
> Thomas, moreover, being at a major center for ergonomics research and a
> member of the faculty (and co-founder of a wonderful research group on the
> topic) is aware of the past research. (see, for example, his lab at:
>
> http://www.lboro.ac.uk/departments/lds/research/groups/human-factors-complex-systems/
>
> But the responses seem to indicate a lack of awareness of the huge amount
> of work on the complexity of accidents and analyses (and hindsight bias).
> And the tendency to blame someone and think the problem is thereby solved.
>
> But the design community doesn't seem to realize that many excellent people
> have been making this argument for years. The American Academies of science
> has a group on "Human System Integration" that has long been an effective
> leader in this enterprise, and decades ago I took part in a similar
> seminar held at the Royal Society in London.
>
> --
> it works the other way too: other disciplines do not know what work the
> designers have been doing.
>
> I myself am equally guilty, as I recently discovered that one group of
> designers (which included me) was unaware of what other design groups were
> doing.
>
> Ah, the research solos we find ourselves within.
>
> Don
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> PhD-Design mailing list <[log in to unmask]>
> Discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design
> Subscribe or Unsubscribe at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/phd-design
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------
PhD-Design mailing list <[log in to unmask]>
Discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design
Subscribe or Unsubscribe at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/phd-design
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|