JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN Archives

PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN  January 2014

PHD-DESIGN January 2014

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Specifying something to be made or done

From:

Francois Nsenga <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

PhD-Design - This list is for discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 8 Jan 2014 14:14:57 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (87 lines)

Hello David !

I think it all depends on the meaning privileged through the term "making".
I entirely agree, in certain occurrences your meaning of "making" is,
however in appearance only, part of the designing - as specification -
process. There is an other meaning, that of a completely separate phase,
called "making", along the process of bringing artefacts into existence.

In my current understanding, artifacts are outputs at the end of a two
phase linear and eventually iterative process:

1. conceiving/planning (specification) for a given (specific) outcome
2. implementing (i.e. making) the stated and accepted specifications

The frequent confusion (no negative connotation here) of the two meanings
arises when the conceiver/specifier of an artifact is at the same time its
maker, as in cases of Fine Arts and Crafts and other performing arts. Or in
cases you mention, those of experiments and trials in fine tuning
specifications through various kinds of models. In all those cases, in the
English language (probably otherwise in other languages), the term 'design'
is used to convey the confusion of the two phases above into the whole
process, often both performed by the same individual. But even then, if one
ventures into an ergonomical exercise of unpacking step after step the
process followed by the artist/craftsperson/experimenter, the two phases
may appear clearly different, distinct, and successive, even though at
times appearing as blurred and/or overlapping.

The above separation of the two phases was made the hall mark of the
industrial process in 17-18 century Europe. As reported by several
scholars, among them Daniel Bell for instance in "The Coming of
Post-Industrial Society"*, the industrial process of artifacts production
"has created a new class, hitherto unknown in society, of the engineer and
the technician, men who are divorced from the site of work but who
constitute a 'planning staff' for the operations of the work process.", In
the new process of artifacts production, the conceiving/planning phase was
thus separated from the making phase. Terry, and myself, were referring to
this latter process of artifacts production.

Warm greetings, and many thanks for your long time dedication in feeding us
with your monthly compilation of events and news related to our field of
Design!

Francois

* Bell,D.: The Coming of Post-Industrial Society. Basic Books (1999), p.
189.



On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 11:42 AM, DAVID DURLING <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Hi Francois,
>
> I would think that making is often an important part of design.
>
> For example, making seems at the heart of the crafts in general. I'm sure
> that many in the crafts see themselves as designers. Such making goes well
> beyond technical skills, though such technical skills may underpin the
> designing as well as the making. In research, exploratory designing and
> making can be a very powerful way of gaining understanding.
>
> Terry's notion of 'specification' seems an elegant definition, so long as
> one accepts that the specification may be formed in many different ways
> including computer generated and physical models. In this case the
> specification may be modified and enhanced by the making.
>
> I recently read the latest book on Jonathan Ive, and was struck by the
> extent of making by the design team as an intrinsic part of the process of
> designing and development. Understanding and taking decisions are
> facilitated greatly by comparison between iterative physical models, at
> least within this successful design team. It would seem here that Terry's
> 'specification' is manifest in both CAD modelling and its three dimensional
> output - but the physical models are the means by which decisions are made
> between the various departments. Making goes well beyond technical skills.
>
> Kind regards,
> David
>
>


-----------------------------------------------------------------
PhD-Design mailing list  <[log in to unmask]>
Discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design
Subscribe or Unsubscribe at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/phd-design
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager