The interview's worth reading, Stephen.
Hal
Halvard Johnson
================
The Perfection of Mozart's Third Eye (downloadable and free) is @
http://www.scribd.com/people/documents/14481250-chalk-editions
[log in to unmask]
http://sites.google.com/site/halvardjohnson/Home
http://entropyandme.blogspot.com
http://imageswithoutwords.blogspot.com
http://www.hamiltonstone.org
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 11:07 PM, Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hi All - I am totally lost on this thread. & the "Etc" here as taken the upper hand. Is it about meter, is about reading or is it about Bruce Andrews interview? Of course,I just responded to a Bruce Andrews public reading experience - which I found difficult (obviously) and I did not give the interview the time of day for which I apologize. I know the interviewer -and I find him a good guy- and I should have read it, and maybe will do. So my bigotry might have gotten the upper hand, and maybe still does. Tho I do not think my response to that particular reading will ever alter, no way.
>
> But maybe somebody here can clarify the thread?
>
> Stephen V
> http://stephenvincent.net/blog/
> --- On Sun, 4/4/10, Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> From: Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: Bruce Andrews interview at The Argotist Online
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Date: Sunday, April 4, 2010, 10:40 AM
>
> Does a(ny) reader's response have to be 'exegetical'?
>
> Ive often felt that what I want is a non exegetical response....
>
> Not only, but....
>
> Doug
> On 3-Apr-10, at 12:05 PM, Jeffrey Side wrote:
>
>> I see your point, that you have to interest yourself when you write. I agree, but I want the reader to have a unique exegetical experience also. I want a poem to produce a simultaneous performance of itself in the reader, so that there is overload and surplus of potential meanings.
>
> Douglas Barbour
> [log in to unmask]
>
> http://www.ualberta.ca/~dbarbour/
>
> Latest books:
> Continuations (with Sheila E Murphy)
> http://www.uap.ualberta.ca/UAP.asp?LID=41&bookID=664
> Wednesdays'
> http://abovegroundpress.blogspot.com/2008/03/new-from-aboveground-press_10.html
>
> The secret
>
> which got lost neither hides
> nor reveals itself, it shows forth
>
> tokens.
>
> Charles Olson
>
|