Yes.
On 5 April 2010 11:09, Halvard Johnson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> The interview's worth reading, Stephen.
>
> Hal
>
> Halvard Johnson
> ================
>
> The Perfection of Mozart's Third Eye (downloadable and free) is @
> http://www.scribd.com/people/documents/14481250-chalk-editions
>
> [log in to unmask]
> http://sites.google.com/site/halvardjohnson/Home
> http://entropyandme.blogspot.com
> http://imageswithoutwords.blogspot.com
> http://www.hamiltonstone.org
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 11:07 PM, Stephen Vincent <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
> > Hi All - I am totally lost on this thread. & the "Etc" here as taken the
> upper hand. Is it about meter, is about reading or is it about Bruce
> Andrews interview? Of course,I just responded to a Bruce Andrews public
> reading experience - which I found difficult (obviously) and I did not give
> the interview the time of day for which I apologize. I know the interviewer
> -and I find him a good guy- and I should have read it, and maybe will do. So
> my bigotry might have gotten the upper hand, and maybe still does. Tho I do
> not think my response to that particular reading will ever alter, no way.
> >
> > But maybe somebody here can clarify the thread?
> >
> > Stephen V
> > http://stephenvincent.net/blog/
> > --- On Sun, 4/4/10, Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >
> > From: Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>
> > Subject: Re: Bruce Andrews interview at The Argotist Online
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Date: Sunday, April 4, 2010, 10:40 AM
> >
> > Does a(ny) reader's response have to be 'exegetical'?
> >
> > Ive often felt that what I want is a non exegetical response....
> >
> > Not only, but....
> >
> > Doug
> > On 3-Apr-10, at 12:05 PM, Jeffrey Side wrote:
> >
> >> I see your point, that you have to interest yourself when you write. I
> agree, but I want the reader to have a unique exegetical experience also. I
> want a poem to produce a simultaneous performance of itself in the reader,
> so that there is overload and surplus of potential meanings.
> >
> > Douglas Barbour
> > [log in to unmask]
> >
> > http://www.ualberta.ca/~dbarbour/ <http://www.ualberta.ca/%7Edbarbour/>
> >
> > Latest books:
> > Continuations (with Sheila E Murphy)
> > http://www.uap.ualberta.ca/UAP.asp?LID=41&bookID=664
> > Wednesdays'
> >
> http://abovegroundpress.blogspot.com/2008/03/new-from-aboveground-press_10.html
> >
> > The secret
> >
> > which got lost neither hides
> > nor reveals itself, it shows forth
> >
> > tokens.
> >
> > Charles Olson
> >
>
--
Andrew
http://hispirits.blogspot.com/
http://frankshome.org/AndrewBurke.html
|