Dear colleagues,
I wrote, enquiring how library services deal with customers who fail to
return stock, beyond standard overdue letters, and said I would summarise
responses for the list.
Currently, St Helens Libraries pursues customers with non-returned loans
through a legal process including county court action, if the value of the
non-returned stock and fines owing exceeds £50. Our authority cumulates
all debts owing, across all services, and prosecutes if more than £100 is
owed. We are not comfortable with this, for a number of reasons, and we
are writing a report that , if accepted, will completely overhaul all our
membership requirements and treatment of defaulters.
Many thanks to colleagues who responded to my email and to our phone calls
- we greatly appreciate your sharing with us (and with the list).
Summary
There were four replies.
· Three library services do not take customers to court
· One does in certain circumstances.
· One council doesn’t take debtors to court for anything, including
council Tax.
· One respondent enquired about a private sector company, Unique
Management Services. A Google search reveals little about them, but they
have worked with Greenwich Libraries, according to a summary of a
conference in 2008.
In addition, we phoned around and spoke to a number of library services.
Most were no longer pursuing their customers through the courts, and in
many cases were using pre-overdues, whether posted, texted or emailed, to
improve customer care and reduce the number of overdues required.
So it seems that court action for non-returned library stock is becoming
the minority option amongst UK public library services, based on the
evidence of this admittedly small sample.
Further details
1. A London borough We don't take people to court - haven't done so for
about 15 years when our legal service began to charge us so much it was
counterproductive; also huge amount of paperwork for very little return.
Currently we have no formal legal mechanism for pursuing defaulters other
than the usual notices.
2. A Scottish authority We've never taken customers to court for non
returned items. I suspect out return rate is similar to those who do take
customers to court but obviously don't have any figures to back that up.
3. Another Scottish authority Currently, we have no means of pursuing
non-returned loans beyond three overdue letters and a final bill issued by
post. The final bill contains the threat of legal action, which the
population are unaware, will simply never materialise.
The council does not pursue any debts through the courts, including council
tax. As such, we have no mechanism to pursue library debts in this way.
I am however looking forward to your summarised comments on the list, since
I'm keen to explore other avenues. I'm already aware that Unique
Management Services offer a 'gentle nudge' approach, specifically for
library services. They seem to guarantee that the income they generate
will at a minimum pay for their services. I'm hoping that someone using
them already might respond to your email.
4. An English shire county [After a series of overdue reminders]
Anything over £50 in value (replacement costs and charges) is referred to
our admin team. An invoice is issued via the [council’s] management system.
Reminders on this are issued if there has been no response after 14 days.
If this still doesn't get a response all cases are referred to our legal
services team who issue a letter advising the customer of potential legal
action.
Cases where the debt is £150+ will be considered as a debt claim case. This
basically invites the borrower into court to agree how the debt will be
cleared (including deductions from benefits etc where appropriate).
Prosecution is rare.
We put a higher ceiling on those cases that are referred to court to ensure
we don't incur any unnecessary costs.We used to use a debt collector but
this became increasingly less successful. We are also prepared to negotiate
payment by instalments; agree a full and final payment (anything from
30%-70% of the full debt); and we are currently investigating how we
respond to those with mental health issues who can become 'serial' debtors.
We don't encourage staff to spend large amounts of time undertaking
shelfchecks or ringing borrowers. Most people who genuinely forget will
respond to the notice. Recovery rates drop considerably once a recovery
process has been triggered - so we only invest in the most significant
cases. Pre-overdue notices issued to a customer before their books are due
back have been used by our partner library services … . This has been a
good customer care development but there is no clear evidence as yet to
identify whether there has been an impact on income levels.
I hope this is useful to others– if anyone reading this wishes to add
further information about their procedures, what’s worked for them, I would
be happy to update this summary.
Regards,
Keith Patterson
Operations Manager
Libraries Management Team
Chester Lane Library
Four Acre Lane
St Helens WA9 4DE
tel: (01744) 677487
fax: (01744) 677082
|